What Became of the Kids Who Participated in the 1981 Johnson Early College Summer Arts Program?

Abstract

Results are reported of a follow-up study conducted nine years after a group of twenty-seven adolescents, judged talented in the visual and performing arts, participated in the Johnson State Early College Summer Arts Program. In this research, which utilized a questionnaire, the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale, and telephone interviews, information was provided about members of this population, now young adults. It was revealed that: 1) art still plays an important role in their lives; 2) they possess the characteristics defined in the program selection criteria; 3) they are highly self-directed; 4) they believe participation in the Early College Program had a positive effect on their lives and their involvement in art; 5) several have overcome significant pre-existing emotional challenges since participating in the Early College Program. It was tentatively concluded: 1) four conative attributes ascribed to participants appear to combine in different ways to influence self-perception and artistic productivity according to gender and over time; 2) respondents believed the Early College Program helped them preserve their artistic inclination into adulthood, contributed to their long-term emotional well-being, and assisted them in college major and career choices; 3) as self-directed adults, they may benefit more from college and adult education programs that allow for a high degree of self-direction in learning situations than from narrowly structured programs. Advice they offered administrators and faculty of programs similar to the Early College Summer Arts Program is summarized and reported.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arieti

(1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

Barbe

(1965). Psychology and education of the gifted. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Clark

, & Zimmerman

(1984). Educating artistically talented students. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Confessore

(1991). Human behavior as a construct for assessing Guglielmino's self-directed learning readiness scale: Pragmatism revisited. In Long

H. B.

&. Associates, Self-directed learning: Consensus and conflict. (pp. 123–146) Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education.

Confessore

, & Confessore

(1981). Attitudes toward physical activity among adolescents talented in the visual and performing arts, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 4 (4), 261–269.

Getzels

(1979). From art student to fine artist: Potential, problem finding, and performance. In Passow

(ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 372–87). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Guglielmino

(1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

Haier

, & Solano

(1976). Educators' stereotypes of mathematically talented boys. In Keating

(ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hickok

(1947). The quiz kids. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Hollingworth

(1929). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.

11.

Kenyon

(1968). Six scales for assessing attitude toward physical activity. Research Quarterly (AAHPER), 39 (3), 566–574.

12.

Knowles

(1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Cambridge Books.

13.

Krueger

(1978). On being gifted. New York: Walker & Company.

14.

Lee

(1978). Suicide and youth. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 57 (4), 200–204.

15.

Long

, & Agyekum

(1988). Self-directed learning: Assessment and validation. In Long

H. B.

& Associates, Self-directed learning: Application and theory (pp. 253–266). Athens, Georgia: Adult Education Department of the University of Georgia.

16.

Mann

(1957). How real are friendships of gifted and typical children in a program of partial segregation? Exceptional Children, 23 (5), 199–201.

17.

Miles

(1946). Gifted children. In Carmichael

(ed.), Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.

18.

Montour

(1977). William fames Sidis, the broken twig. American Psychologist, 32 (4), 267–79.

19.

Perry

Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart &. Winston.

20.

Terman

, & Oden

(1947). The gifted child grows up. In Terman

(ed.), Genetic studies of genius (vol. 4). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

21.

Terman

, & Oden

(1959). The gifted group at mid-life; thirty-five year's follow-up of the superior child. In Terman

(ed.), Genetic studies of genius (vol. 5). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

22.

Trotter

(1971) Self-image. Science News, 100 (8), 130–131.

23.

Tuttle

, & Becker

(1983). Program design and development for gifted and talented students. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

24.

Wiener

(1957). Analysis of the child prodigy. New York Times Magazine. June 2, 1957, pp. 15–30; 32–34.