This study investigated maternal and paternal influences on the mathematics self-concept of high-achieving adolescent girls. The differential effects of parent-daughter identification, parent mathematics self-concept, and parent expectations on adolescent mathematics self-concept were examined in a sample of 165 high-ability adolescent girls and their parents. For both mothers and fathers, parent mathematics self-concept was related to parent expectations regardless of the degree of identification between parent and daughter. Parent expectations in turn linked to daughter mathematics self-concept. There was little evidence that degree of parent-daughter identification influenced the relations among parent mathematics self-concept, parent expectations, and adolescent mathematics self-concept. These results confirm and extend previous findings regarding the importance of parent expectations in shaping children's conceptions of their mathematics abilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardwickJ. (1971). Psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row.
2.
BenbowC.MinorL. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 425–436.
3.
BlalockH.Jr. (1979). Social statistics (rev. 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
DickensM. (1990). Parental influences on the mathematics self-concept of high achieving adolescent girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
5.
DixL. (1987). Women: Their underrepresentation and career differentials in science and engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
6.
EcclesJ. (1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions and academic choice: origins and change. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
7.
EcclesJ. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.
8.
EcclesJ. (1985). Why doesn't Jane run? Sex differences in educational and occupational patterns. In HorowitzF.O'BrienM. (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Development perspectives (pp. 251–295). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
9.
EntwisleD.BakerD. (1983). Gender and young children's expectations for performance in arithmetic. Developmental Psychology, 19, 200–209.
10.
FeingoldA. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.
11.
HannaG.SonnenscheinJ. (1985). Relative validity of the Orleans-Hanna Algebra Prognosis Test in the prediction of girls' and boys' first-year algebra. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 361–367.
12.
HelsonR. (1971). Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Personality, 36, 210–211, 217–220.
13.
HollingsheadA.B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. New Haven. CT: Yale University, Department of Sociology.
14.
KeithT. (1988). Path analysis: An introduction for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 17, 343–362.
15.
KimballM. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–124.
16.
MalcolmS. (1988, March). Brilliant women for science, mathematics and engineering: Getting more than we deserve? Paper presented at the TIP/NSF Conference on Academic Talent, Duke Univ., Durham, N.C.
17.
OsgoodC.SuciG.TannenbaumP. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
18.
PallasA.AlexanderK. (1983). Sex differences in quantitative SAT performance: New evidence on the differential coursework hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 165–182.
19.
ParsonsJ.AdlerT.KaczalaC. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53(2), 310–321.
20.
PhillipsD. (1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly competent children. Child Development, 58, 1308–1320.
21.
PhillipsD. (1984). The illusion of incompetence among academically competent children. Child Development, 55, 2000–2016.
22.
RaymondC.BenbowC. (1986). Gender differences in mathematics: A function of parental support and student sex typing?Developmental Psychology, 22, 808–819.
23.
SchachterF. (1982). Sibling deidentification and split-parent identification: A family tetrad. In LambM.Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 123–151). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
24.
SchachterF. (1985). Sibling deidentification in the clinic: Devil vs. angel. Family Process, 24, 415–427.
25.
SchachterF.GilutzG.ShoreE.AdlerM. (1978). Sibling deidentification judged by mothers: Cross-validation and developmental studies. Child Development, 49, 543–546.
26.
ShermanJ. (1980). Mathematics, spatial visualization, and related factors: Changes in girls and boys, grades 8–11. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 476–482.
27.
SwiatekM.BenbowC. (1991). Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528–538.
