Over the past twenty years, changes in the nation's labor market have increased the importance of possessing a postsecondary degree. Students who continue their education after high school maximize their preparedness for careers in today's changing economy as they learn the higher order thinking and technical skills to take advantage of current and future job market trends. For individuals with disabilities, completion of some type of postsecondary education, including vocational-technical training, significantly improves their chances of securing meaningful employment. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that youth with disabilities are fully prepared in secondary school to continue on to and to meet the challenges of postsecondary education. The successful use of technology and other supports plays a critical role in this preparation. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe findings from a five-year research project at the University of Hawaii at Manoa that demonstrate the importance of postsecondary school for individuals with disabilities and highlights the current status of postsecondary access for these individuals, (b) discuss barriers to the successful transition between secondary school and postsecondary school for youth with disabilities, and (c) explore the implications of these findings for secondary school preparation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. 12101 et seq. (1993).
2.
BenzM.LindstromL.YovonoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 509–529.
3.
BenzM.YovanoffP.DorenB. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 151–165.
4.
BerlinerD. C.BiddleB. J. (1996). Standards amidst uncertainty and inequality. The School Administrator, 53(5), 42–47.
5.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399–413.
6.
BrinckerhoffL. C. (1994). Developing effective self-advocacy skills in college-bound students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29(4), 229–237.
7.
ColvertA. L.SmithJ. W. (2000). What is reasonable? Workplace communication and people who are disabled. In BraithwaiteD. O.ThompsonT. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Communication and People with Disabilities: Research and Application (pp. 141–158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
8.
DeBettencourtL. U. (2002). Understanding the differences between IDEA and Section 504. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 16–23.
9.
Disability Rights Advocates. (1997). Disability Statistics Center. The status of people with disabilities in the U.S.Disability Watch, 18–19.
10.
EdgarE. (1998). Employment as an outcome for mildly handicapped students: Current status and future directions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21 (1), 1–8.
11.
FairweatherJ. S.ShaverD. M. (1991). Making the transition to postsecondary education and training. Exceptional Children, 57(3), 264–270.
12.
Federal Regulations for Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities, 34 CFR Part 300, (1997).
13.
FleischerD. Z.ZamesF. (2001). The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
GajarA. (1998). Postsecondary education. In RuschF.ChadseyJ. (Eds.), Beyond High School: Transition from School to Work (pp. 385–405). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
15.
GordonM.KeiserS. (1998). Accommodations in Higher Education Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). DeWitt, NY: GSI Publications.
16.
GrigalM.TestD. W.BeattieJ.WoodW. M. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 63(3), 357–372.
17.
Hanley-MaxwellC.PogoloffS. M.Whitney-ThomasJ. (1998). Families: The heart of transition. In RuschF. R.ChadseyJ. G. (Eds.), Beyond High School: Transition from School to Work (pp. 234–261). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
18.
HEATH Resource Center. (2001). 2001 College Freshmen with Disabilities: A Biennial Statistical Profile. Washington D.C.: HEATH Resource Center, The George Washington University.
19.
HornL.BerktoldJ. (1999). Students with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education: A Profile of Preparation, Participation, and Outcomes. Statistical Analysis Report (NCES 1999–187). Washington, D.C.: National Center on Educational Statistics.
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (1997).
21.
IzzoM. V. (2001, July). What Faculty and Students Say About the Teaching-Learning Process. Paper presented at the AHEAD Conference, Portland, OR.
22.
IzzoM. V.CartledgeC.MillerL. E.GrowickB.Rutkowski. (2000). Improving employment earnings: Extended transition services that make a difference. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 23(2), 139–156.
23.
IzzoM. V.HertzfeldJ. E.AaronJ. H. (2001). Raising the Bar: Student Self-Determination + Good Teaching = Success. Unpublished manuscript, Columbus, OH.
24.
JohnsonD. R. (2001, October). Transition, Secondary Education Reform, and Access to the General Education Curriculum. Paper presented at the National Capacity Building Institute, Denver, Colorado.
25.
JohnsonD. R.SharpeM. N.StoddenR. A. (2000). The transition to postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Impact, 13, 2, 26.
26.
KohlerP. D. (1998). Implementing a transition perspective on education: A comprehensive approach to planning and delivering secondary education and transition services. In RuschF. R.ChadseysJ. G. (Eds.), Beyond High School: Transition from School to Work (pp. 179–203). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27.
KupperL. (1997). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997: Curriculum. Office of Special Education Programs, National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. Retrieved December 7, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.nichcy.org/Trainpkg/toc.htm.
28.
MoroneyR. M. (1986). Shared Responsibility, Families and Social Policy. New York: Aldine.
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1999, August). An Institutional Perspective on Students with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
30.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Stats in Brief: Postsecondary Students with Disabilities: Enrollment, Service, and Persistence (NCES 2000–092): U.S. Department of Education: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
31.
National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. (2000, June). National Survey of Educational Support Provision to Students with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education Settings. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa, RRTC.
32.
National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. (2001, December). IDEA1997: Implications for secondary education and transition services. Minneapolis, MN: DeStefano, L., Hazazi, S. B., & Johnson, D. R.
33.
National Organization on Disabilities. (1998). 1998N.O.D./Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education.
34.
National Organization on Disabilities, & Harris Interactive. (2002, July). Executive Summary: 2000 N.O.D./Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities. Washington, D.C.: National Organization on Disabilities.
35.
PhelpsL. A.Hanley-MaxwellC. (1997). School-to-work transitions for youths with disabilities: A review of outcomes and practices. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 197–226.
36.
RifkinJ. (1995). The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. New York: Putnam.
RoyA.DimigenG.TaylorM. (1998). The relationship between social networks and the employment of visually impaired college graduates. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 92, 423–432.
39.
RumbergerR.DaymontT. (1984). The economic value of academic and vocational training acquired in high school. In BorusM. (Ed.), Youth and the Labor Market: Analyses of the National Longitudinal Survey (pp. 157–191). Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
ShawS. (2002). Postsecondary supports for students with disabilities. Paper presented at the National Capacity Building Institute, Honolulu, HI.
42.
ShawS.BrinkerhoffL.KristlerJ.McGuireJ. M. (1990). Preparing students with learning disabilities for postsecondary education: Issues and future needs. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 21–26.
43.
StoddenR. A.DowrickP. W. (2001). Postsecondary education and employment of adults with disabilities. American Rehabilitation, 25(3), 19–23.
44.
StoddenR. A.DowrickP. W.GilmoreS.GallowayL. (2003). A Review of Secondary School Factors Influencing Postschool Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities (MS#043-H01). Manuscript submitted for publication.
45.
StoddenR. A.JonesM. A.ChangK. B. T. (2002). Services, Supports and Accommodations for Individuals with Disabilities: An Analysis Across Secondary Education, Postsecondary Education and Employment. A White Paper developed for the National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Supports. Retrieved, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ncset.hawaii.edu/publications/pdf/services_supports.pdf.
46.
StoddenR. A.StoddenN. J.GilmoreS.GallowayL. M. (2003). Review of Secondary School Curricula Issues and Impact Upon Access and Participation of Youth with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47.
StoddenR. A.WhelleyT.ChangC.HardingT. (2001). Current status of educational support provision to students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16(3/4), 189–198.
48.
ThomasS. B. (2000). College students and disability law. The Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 248–257.
49.
U. S. Department of Education. (1995). Research in the Education of Individuals with Disabilities. Innovation and Development in Special Education. Washington, D. C.
50.
U. S. Department of Education. (1996, October). What is a school wide program?Improving America's Schools: A Newsletter on Issues in School Reform.
51.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2002, April 9, 2002). New Freedom Initiative: Fulfilling America's Promise to Americans with Disabilities [Website]. Retrieved August 12, 2003, from the World Wide Web: http://www.os.dhhs.gov/newfreedom/.
52.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1999). Report on the American Workforce. Washington, D.C.: Alex M. Herman, Secretary.
53.
The Vocational Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq. (1973).
54.
WagnerM.BlackorbyJ. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare. The Future of Children: Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6(1), 103–120.
55.
WagnerM.NewmanL.D'AmicoR.JayE. D.Butler-NalinP.MarderC.CoxR. (1991). Youth with Disabilities: How are They Doing? The First Comprehensive Report for the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
56.
WaldronN.McLeskeyJ. (1998). The effects of an inclusive school program on students with mild and severe learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64(3), 395–405.
57.
WitteR. H.PhilpsL.KakelaM. (1998). Job satisfaction of college graduates with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(3), 259–265.
