Despite the potential of emerging technologies to assist persons with cognitive disabilities, significant practical impediments remain to be overcome in commercialization, consumer abandonment, and in the design and development of useful products.
Barriers also exist in terms of the financial and organizational feasibility of specific envisioned products, and their limited potential to reach the consumer market. Innovative engineering approaches, effective needs analysis, user-centered design, and rapid evolutionary development are essential to ensure that technically feasible products meet the real needs of persons with cognitive disabilities.
Efforts must be made by advocates, designers and manufacturers to promote better integration of future software and hardware systems so that forthcoming iterations of personal support technologies and assisted care systems technologies do not quickly become obsolete. They will need to operate seamlessly across multiple real-world environments in the home, school, community, and workplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottC.CribbA. (2001). Special schools, inclusion and the world wide web: The emerging research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 331–342.
AkhutinaT.ForemanN.KrichevetsA.MatikkaL.NarhiV.PylaevaN.VahakuopusJ. (2003). Improving spatial functioning in children with cerebral palsy using computerized and traditional game tasks. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25(24), 1361–1371.
4.
AlcaldeC.NavarroJ. I.MarchenaE.RuizG. (1998). Acquisition of basic concepts by children with intellectual disabilities using a computer-assisted learning approach. Psychological Reports, 82(3), 1051–1056.
5.
AspinallA.HegartyJ. R. (2001). ICT for adults with learning disabilities: An organisation-wide audit. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 365–372.
BennettJ.BodineC.MulliganJ.LightnerM. (2002). Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Recreational Technologies and Exercise Physiology Benefiting Persons with Disabilities (REC-TEC). National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant # H133E020715.
8.
BergmanM. M. (2002). The benefits of a cognitive orthotic in brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(5), 431–445.
9.
Bernard-OpitzV.SriramN.Nakhoda-SapuanS. (2001). Enhancing social problem solving in children with autism and normal children through computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(4), 377–384.
10.
BlischakD. M.SchlosserR. W. (2003). Use of technology to support independent spelling by students with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(4), 293–304.
BraddockD. (2001, November 1). Emerging research frontiers and partnerships in developmental disabilities. Keynote Address at Annual Conference, Association of University Centers on Disabilities, Bethesda, MD.
13.
BrownD. J.StandenP. J. (1999). The tutoring role of mentors working with adults and elderly people with learning disabilities using virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2(6), 593–599.
14.
CavalierA. R.BrownC. C. (1998). From passivity to participation: The transformational possibilities of speech-recognition technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(6), 60–65.
15.
CavuotoJ. (2004). Neural engineering's image problem. IEEE Spectrum, April, 32–37.
16.
ColeE. (1999). Cognitive prosthetics: An overview to a method of treatment. Neurorehabilitation, 12, 39–51.
17.
CrombyJ. J.StandenP. J.BrownD. J. (1996). The potentials of virtual environments in the education and training of people with learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40(6), 489–501.
18.
DarioP.GuglielmelliE.LaschiC.TetiG. (1999). MOVAID: A personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people. Technology and Disability, 10(2), 77–93.
19.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2004). Computer-Mediated, Self-Directed Computer Training and Skill Assessment for Individuals with Mental Retardation, Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 16(1), 95–105.
20.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2003). Utilization of Computer Technology to Facilitate Money Management by Individuals with Mental Retardation, Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 38(1), 106–112.
21.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2002a). Enhancing independent task performance for individuals with mental retardation through use of a handheld self-directed visual and audio prompting system. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(2), 209–218.
22.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2002b). Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a Palmtop personal computer. Mental Retardation, 40(5), 358–65.
23.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2001). Enhancing independent internet access for individuals with mental retardation through use of a specialized web browser: A pilot study. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(1), 107–113.
24.
Digital Angel. (2002). The Digital Angel Personal Safety and Location System with GPS technology. [On-line]. Retrieved from: http://www.digitalangel.net/default.asp.
Elite Care. (2002). Extended family residences, an alternative to assisted living: Oatfield Estates. [On-line]. Available: http://www.elite-care.com/oatfield.html.
FauchetP. (2002, August). Behavioral and biological sensing for aging in place at home. Intel Conference on Computing, Cognition, and Caring for Future Elders.
FischerG.SullivanJ. (2002). Human-Centered Public Transportation Systems for Persons with Cognitive Disabilities – Challenges and Insights for Participatory Design. Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference (PDC′02), Malmö University, Sweden. [Online].
31.
FurnissF.LancioniG.RochaN.CunhaB.SeedhouseP.MoratoP.O'ReillyM. F. (2001). VICAID: Development and evaluation of a palmtop-based job aid for workers with severe developmental disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 277–287.
32.
FurnissF.WardA. (1999). A palmtop-based job aid for workers with severe intellectual disabilities. Technology and Disability, 10(1), 53–67.
33.
GrealyM. A.JohnsonD. A.RushtonS. K. (1999). Improving cognitive function after brain injury: The use of exercise and virtual reality. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(6), 661–667.
34.
HammelJ. (2000). Assistive technology and environmental intervention (AT-EI) impact on the activity and life roles of aging adults with developmental disabilities: Findings and implications for practice. Aging and Developmental Disability, 18(1), 37–58.
35.
HammelJ.LaiJ. S.HellerT. (2002). The impact of assistive technology and environmental interventions on function and living situation status with people who are ageing with developmental disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 93–105.
36.
HartT.HawkeyK.WhyteJ. (2002). Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A within subjects trial. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(6), 556–570.
37.
HasselbringT. S. (2001). A possible future of special education technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 15–21.
38.
HoenigH.TaylorD. H.Jr.SloanF. A. (2003). Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly?American Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 330–337.
39.
HorchK. W.DhillonG. S. (Eds.). (2004). Neuroprosthetics: Theory and practice. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
40.
HwangW. S.RyuY. J.ParkJ. H.ParkE. S.LeeE. G.KooJ. M.JeonH. Y.LeeB. C.KangS. K.KimS. J.AhnC.HwangJ. H.ParkK. Y.CibelliJ. B.MoonS. Y. (2004). Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned bastocyst. Science, 303(12), 1669–1674.
41.
JohnsonR.HegartyJ. R. (2003). Websites as educational motivators for adults with learning disability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 479–486.
42.
KautzH.EtzioniO.BorrielloG.FoxD.ArnsteinL.OstendorfM.LogsdonR. (2001). Assisted cognition: Computer aids for people with Alzheimer's Disease. Unpublished manuscript. Seattle, WA.
43.
KayeH. S. (2000). Computer and internet use among people with disabilities. Disability Statistics Report (13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
44.
KurzweilR. (1990). The age of intelligent machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45.
KurzweilR. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.BasiliG. (2001). An overview of technological resources used in rehabilitation research with people with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23(12), 501–508.
48.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SeedhouseP.FurnissF.CunhaB. (2000). Promoting independent task performance by persons with severe developmental disabilities through a new computer-aided system. Behavior Modification, 24(5), 700–718.
49.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.Van den HofE.FurnissF.SeedhouseP.RochaN. (1999). Task instructions for persons with severe intellectual disability. Reducing the number of instruction occasions after the acquisition phase. Behavioral Interventions, 14, 199–211.
50.
LancioniG. E.OlivaD. (1999). Using an orientation system for indoor travel and activity with persons with multiple disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 21(3), 124–127.
51.
LangoneJ.CleesT. J.RieberL.MatzkoM. (2003). The future of computer-based interactive technology for teaching individuals with moderate to severe disabilities: Issues related to research and practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(1), 5–15.
52.
LannenT.BrownD.PowellH. (2002). Control of virtual environments for young people with learning difficulties. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(11–12), 578–586.
53.
LightJ.RobertsB.DimarcoR.GreinerN. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 153–180.
McNaughtonD.LightJ.ArnoldK. B. (2002). “Getting your wheel in the door”: Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communicationAAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 59–76.
57.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.LangoneJ. (2002). Computer-based video instruction to teach persons with moderate intellectual disabilities to read grocery aisle signs and locate items. The Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 224–240.
MirendaP. (2001). Autism, augmentative communication, and assistive technology: What do we really know?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 141–151.
60.
The National Down Syndrome Society. (2001). Down Syndrome Research Survey – 2001. Survey given to participants of the 2001 National Down Syndrome Society. San Diego, CA.
O'HaraD.Seagriff-CurtinP.DaviesD.StockS. (2002, October). Innovation in health education and communication: A research project to demonstrate the effectiveness of personal support technology for improving the oral health of adults with mental retardation. Poster presentation at the inaugural conference of the National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, GA.
63.
PantelidisV. (1995). Reasons to use virtual reality in education. VR in the Schools, 1(1), 9.
64.
ParetteH. P.VanBiervlietA. (1990). Persons with mental retardation and technology use patterns and needs. Little Rock, AR: Center for Research on Teaching and Learning.
65.
PattersonR. (2002). An American Sign Language finger-spelling translator. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Coleman Institute for Cognitive Disabilities, Boulder, CO.
66.
PavelM. (2002, August). Unobtrusive health state estimation. Intel Conference on Computing, Cognition, and Caring for Future Elders.
RimmerJ. H.BraddockD.PitettiK. H. (1996). Research on physical activity and disability: An emerging national priority. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28(8), 1366–1372.
69.
RizzoloM. C.BellR.BraddockD.HewittA.BrownC. (in press). Emerging technologies for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In LakinK. C.EidelmanS. (Eds.), Goals of The Arc Research Conference. Silver Spring, MD: The Arc of the United States.
70.
RomskiM.A.SevcikR.A. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3(4), 363–368.
71.
RomskiM.A.SevcikR.A. (2000). Communication, technology, and disability. In WehmeyerM.PattonJ.R. (Eds.), Mental Retardation in the 21st Century (pp. 299–313). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
72.
RomskiM. A.SevcikR. A.AdamsonL. B. (1999). Communication patterns of youth with mental retardation with and without their speech-output communication devices. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104(3), 249–259.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1997). Can computers teach problem-solving strategies to students with mild mental retardation? A case study. Remedial & Special Education, 18(3), 157–165.
75.
StandenP. J.BrownD. J.CrombyJ. J. (2001). The effective use of virtual environments in the education and rehabilitation of students with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 289–299.
76.
StandenP. J.CrombyJ. J.BrownD. J. (1997). Evaluation of the use of virtual environments with students with severe learning difficulties. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 10(8), 139.
TaylorJohn (2003, January) Personal communication.
79.
The Technology and Media Division (TAM) of the Council for Exceptional Children and the Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (2003). Assistive technology consideration. Retrieved September 9, 2003 from http://www.ideapractices.org/resources/tam/index.html.
80.
TinkerR. (2001). Future technologies for special learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 31–67.
81.
U. S. Department of Commerce (2003). Technology assessment of the U.S. assistive technology industry. Washington, DC: Bureau of Industry and Security. Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security. Strategic Analysis Division.
