Recommended Practices and Parent Perspectives regarding AT Use in Early Intervention

Abstract

It frequently is suggested that parents underutilize assistive technology (AT) for their young children with disabilities despite wide spread recommended practices for providing optimal AT interventions (i.e., devices and services). However, neither parent perspectives of AT underutilization or families' experiences with AT have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this article is to provide information about families' experiences with AT for their infants and toddlers who are receiving early intervention services. Computer assisted telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of 924 parents or other family members of children receiving Part C early intervention services. Participants were asked about various aspects of their experiences with AT, including devices, success rates, and resources. Results indicate that for the most part, families identifying, using, and paying for various devices do so without professional assistance. Further, most devices they have tried, or are trying, are perceived as having limited success. When these results are considered with regard to previous research addressing provider perspectives in relation to families, substantive differences are apparent. To maximize early intervention outcomes using AT in early intervention, families may benefit from increased collaboration with their early intervention providers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brotherson

M. J.

Cook

C. C.

Parette

H. P.

(1996). A home centered approach to assistive technology provisions for young children with disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 86–95.

Campbell

P.H.

(2004). Participation-based services: Promoting children's participation in natural settings. Young Exceptional Children, 8(1), 20–29.

Campbell

P. H.

McGregor

Nacik

(1994). Promoting the development of young children through use of adaptive and assistive technology. In Safford

P. H.

(Ed.), Yearbook in early childhood education: Early childhood special education (pp. 192–217). New York: Teachers College Press.

Dugan

Campbell

Wilcox

(2006). Beliefs and decision-making about assistive technology in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 3–13.

Judge

(1998). Providing access to assistive technology for young children and families. In Judge

S.L.

Parette

H.P.

(Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities (pp. 1–15). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Judge

(2002). Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 15(1), 60–68.

Judge

S. L.

Parette

(Eds.). (1998a). Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to family-centered services. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Judge

S. L.

Parette

H. P.

(1998b). Family-centered assistive technology decision-making. Infant-Toddler Intervention, 8(2), 185–206.

Kemp

C. E.

Parette

H. P.

(2000). Barriers to minority family involvement in assistive technology decision-making processes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 384–392.

10.

Lahm

E. A.

Sizemore

(2002). Factors that influence assistive technology decision-making. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 15–26.

11.

Langone

Malone

D. M.

Kinsley

(1999). Technology solutions for young children with developmental concerns. Infants and Young Children, 11(4), 65–78.

12.

Long

Huang

Woodbridge

Woolverton

Minkel

(2003). Integrating assistive technology into an outcome-driven model of service delivery. Infants and Young Children, 16, 272–283.

13.

Mistrett

(2001). Synthesis on the use of assistive technology with infants and toddlers (birth through age two) (Contract No. HS97017002, Task Order No. 14). Washington DC: U.S Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Division of Research to Practice.

14.

Mistrett

(2004). Assistive technology helps young children with disabilities participate in daily activities. Technology in Action, 1(4), 1–8.

15.

Parette

H. P.

(1997). Family-centered practice and computers for children with disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 25(1), 53–55.

16.

Parette

H. P.

Brotherson

M. J.

(2004). Family-centered and culturally responsive assistive technology decision-making. Infants and Young Children, 17(4), 355–367.

17.

Parette

H. P.

Brotherson

M. J.

Huer

M. B.

(2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 177–190.

18.

Parette

H. P.

Hourcade

J. J.

(1997). Family issues and assistive technology needs: A sampling of state practices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(3), 26–43.

19.

Parette

McMahan

G. A.

(2002). What should we expect of assistive technology?: Being sensitive to family goals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(1), 56–61.

20.

Parette

VanBiervliet

Hourcade

J. J.

(2000). Family-centered decision-making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 45–55.

21.

Romski

Sevcik

R. A.

(2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants and Young Children, 18(3), 174–185.

22.

Stremel

(2005). DEC recommended practices: Technology applications. In Sandall

Hemmeter

M. L.

Smith

B. J.

McLean

M. E.

(Eds.), DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education (pp. 147–162). Longmont, CO: Sopris West Educational Services.

23.

Vanbiervliet

Parette

(2002). Develop and evaluation of the Families, Cultures and Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) multimedia program. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 131–143.

24.

Wilcox

Bacon

Campbell

(2004). National survey of parents and providers using AT in early intervention. Research Brief 1(3) (Tots-N-Tech Research Institute, Arizona State University). Retrieved September 24, 2006, from http://www.asu.edu/clas/tnt/home_files/r_briefs.html.

25.

Wilcox

Guimond

Campbell

Moore

H. Weintraub

(2006). Assistive technology for infants and toddlers with disabilities: Provider perspectives regarding use, decision-making practices, and resources. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 33–49.