AllsoppD. H.KygerM. M.LovinL. H. (2007). Teaching mathematics meaningfully: Solutions for reaching struggling learners. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
2.
AnstromT. (2006). Achieving mathematical literacy: Interventions for students with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research.
3.
LiebermanD. A. (2004). Learning and memory. Belmont, CA: Tomson-Wadsworth.
4.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.ShiahS. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6(2), 89–98.
5.
MercerC. D.PullenP. C. (2005). Students with learning disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
6.
MillerS. P.MercerC. D. (1993). Using data to learn about concrete-semi-concrete-abstract instruction for students with math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 89–96.
7.
MoyerP. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics: An International Journal, 47(2), 175–197.
8.
ReimerK.MoyerP. S. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25.
9.
SteenK.BrooksD.LyonT. (2006). The impact of virtual manipulatives on first grade geometry instruction and learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 373–391.
10.
SuhJ.MoyerP. S. (2005). Examining technology uses in the classroom: Developing fraction sense using virtual manipulative concept tutorials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(4), 1–22.
11.
SuhJ.MoyerP. S. (2007). Developing students' representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155–173.
12.
ZorfassJ.FollansbeeR.WeagleV. (2006, June). Integrating applets into middle grades math: Improving conceptual understanding for students with math difficulties. Technology in Action, 2(2), 1–8.
