Demonstrating comprehension of text is a complex skill that is an area of difficulty for many students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Shared story reading is an intervention that has a history of effectiveness in teaching literacy skills to students with extensive support needs. This study used a multiple probe across participants design to evaluate the effects of shared story reading using e-texts and embedded prompting on vocabulary and reading comprehension of grade-aligned narrative texts by elementary students with ASD who were also English-language learners. Outcomes indicate shared story reading with the embedded technological supports was effective for teaching comprehension of WH questions as well as identification of WH rules and definitions. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364. doi:10.1177/001440290907500305
3.
BrowderD. M.HudsonM. E.WoodA. L. (2013). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability who are emergent readers to comprehend passages of text. Exceptionality, 21, 191–206. doi:10.1080/09362835.2013.802236
4.
BrowderD. M.LeeA.MimsP. (2011). Using shared stories and individual response modes to promote comprehension and engagement in literacy for students with multiple, severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 339–351.
5.
BrowderD. M.MimsP. J.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.LeeA. (2008). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 3–12. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.3
6.
BrowderD. M.RootJ. R.WoodL.AllisonC. (2015). Effects of a story-mapping procedure using the iPad on the comprehension of narrative texts by students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. doi:1088357615611387
7.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040301
8.
BrownH. M.Oram-CardyJ.JohnsonA. (2013). A meta-analysis of the reading comprehension skills of individuals on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 932–955. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1638-1
9.
DiCamilloK. (2000). Because of Winn Dixie. Somerville, MA: Candlewick Press.
10.
El ZeinF.SolisM.VaughnS.McCulleyL. (2014). Reading comprehension interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders: A synthesis of research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1303–1322. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1989-2
11.
GastD.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Single case research methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
HowardM. (2002). Case of the sassy parrot. Greenville, SC: BJU Press.
13.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2014). Improving listening comprehension responses for students with moderate intellectual disability during literacy class. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 11–29.
14.
HudsonM. E.TestD. W. (2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 34–45. doi:10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.34
15.
KnightV.McKissickB. R.SaundersA. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2628–2648. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1814-y
16.
KnightV. F.WoodC. L.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.O’BrienC. P. (2015). An exploratory study using science eTexts with students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 86–99. doi:10.1177/1088357614559214
17.
MechlingL. C.HunnicuttJ. R. (2011). Computer-based video self-modeling to teach receptive understanding of prepositions by students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 369–385. doi:23880592
18.
MimsP. J.HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2012). Using read-alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 67–80. doi:10.1177/1088357612446859
19.
NationK.ClarkeP.WrightB.WilliamsC. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 911–919. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1
20.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Clearinghouse.
21.
QuillK. A. (2000). Do-watch-listen-say: Social and communication intervention for children with autism. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
22.
RiveraC. J.SpoonerF.WoodC. L.HicksS. C. (2013). Multimedia shared stories for diverse learners with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28, 53–68. doi:10.1177/016264341302800405
23.
RiveraC. J.WoodC. L.SpoonerF. (2012). Comparative effects of Spanish and English vocabulary instruction for English language learners with moderate intellectual disability. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13, 42–55.
24.
RohenaE. I.JitendraA. K.BrowderD. M. (2002). Comparison of the effects of Spanish and English constant time delay instruction on sight word reading by Hispanic learners with mental retardation. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 171–186. doi:10.1177/00224669020360030701
25.
RootJ. R.StevensonB.Ley-DavisP.GeddesJ.TestD. W. (2016). Establishing computer-assisted instruction to teach academics to students with autism as an evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2947-6
26.
SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.Kemp-InmanA.WoodL. A. (2014). Using an iPad2 with systematic instruction to teach shared stories for elementary-aged students with autism. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 30–46.
27.
SpoonerF.Kemp-InmanA.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.WoodL.DavisL. L. (2015). Generalization of literacy skills through portable technology for students with severe disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 52–70. doi:10.1177/1540796915586190
28.
SpoonerF.RiveraC. J.BrowderD. M.BakerJ. N.SalasS. (2009). Teaching emergent literacy skills using cultural contextual story-based lessons. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34, 102–112. doi:10.2511/rpsd.34.3-4.102
29.
WechslerD. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
30.
WilliamsonP.CarnahanC. R.BirriN.SwobodaC. (2015). Improving comprehension of narrative using character event maps for high school students with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 49, 28–38. doi:10.1177/0022466914521301
31.
WoleryM.GastD. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52–77. doi:10.1177/027112148400400305
32.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.SchultzT. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence Based Practice Review Group.
