Evaluation of Self-Paced Online Training on Pre-Service Teachers’ Case Application of Video-Based Intervention for Individuals on the Autism Spectrum: A Feasibility Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Evaluation of Self-Paced Online Training on Pre-Service Teachers’ Case Application of Video-Based Intervention for Individuals on the Autism Spectrum: A Feasibility Study
Pre-service teachers faced significant challenges due to a lack of knowledge and skills regarding evidence-based practices (EBPs). Self-paced online training on instructional methods or strategies has been successfully provided for pre-service professionals. Using interactive and pedagogically informed instructional technology (e.g., HTML5 package) to design and develop self-paced online modules can increase active learning and knowledge acquisition. The present study evaluated the effects of self-paced online training on pre-service teachers’ case application of video-based intervention (including video modeling and video prompting) to support individuals on the autism spectrum. A pre- and post-test control group design was utilized. Fifty-nine undergraduate students who majored in special education or general education participated in this study. Results provided preliminary evidence that the self-paced online training effectively improved pre-service teachers’ case application of the video-based intervention strategy. In addition, participants agreed on the social acceptability of the online module of the video-based intervention. The results, limitations, and future implications are discussed from the perspective of effective and socially valid online training.
AkmanogluN.YanardagM.BatuE. S. (2014). Comparing video modeling and graduated guidance together and video modeling alone for teaching role playing skills to children with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471404900103
2.
BaggettK. M.DavisB.FeilE. G.SheeberL. L.LandryS. H.CartaJ. J.LeveC. (2010). Technologies for expanding the reach of evidence-based interventions: Preliminary results for promoting social-emotional development in each childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(4), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121409354782
3.
BandaD. R.DogoeM. S.MatusznyR. M. (2011). Review of video prompting studies with persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(4), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471104600404
4.
BennettK. D.AljehanyM. S.AltafE. M. (2017). Systematic review of video-based instruction component and parametric analyses. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417690255
5.
BolingE.HoughM.KrinskyH.SaleemH.StevensM. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006
Charlop-ChristyM. H.LeL.FreemanK. A. (2000). A comparison of video modeling with in vivo modeling for teaching children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(6), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005635326276
8.
ChengY. (2020). Students' satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: Roles of interactivity and course quality factors. Education + Training, 62(9), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2019-0245
9.
ChiM. T. H.WylieR. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
10.
ClarkR. C. (2020). Evidence-based training methods: A guide for training professionals (3rd ed.). Associations for Talent Development.
11.
ClarkR. C.MayerR. E. (2016). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
13.
CookB. G.OdomS. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900201
14.
CoxA. (2025). Video modeling, updated. The university of North Carolina at chapel hill, frank porter graham child development institute, autism focused intervention resources and modules. https://afirm.fpg.unc.edu
15.
Da FonteM. A.Barton-ArwoodS. M. (2017). Collaboration of general and special education teachers: Perspectives and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217693370
16.
EbnerC.GegenfurtnerA. (2019). Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 4(92), 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00092
EllisR.GoodyearP. (2013). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. Routledge.
19.
EversK.NoensI.SteyaertJ.WagemansJ. (2011). Combining strengths and weaknesses in visual perception of children with an autism spectrum disorder: Perceptual matching of facial expressions. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(4), 1327–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.01.004
20.
FranzoneE.Collet-KlingenbergL. (2008). Overview of video modeling. University of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, Waisman Center.
21.
GadaireD. M.BartellK.VillacortaJ. (2018). Evaluating group activity schedules to promote social play in children with autism. Learning and Motivation, 64, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2017.11.004
22.
GanzJ. B.Earles-VollrathT. L.CookK. E. (2011). Video modeling: A visually based intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(6), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991104300601
23.
GardnerS.WolfeP. (2013). Use of video modeling and video prompting interventions for teaching daily living skills to individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813807714555
24.
GeigerV.MulliganJ.Date-HuxtableL.AhlipR.JonesD. H.MayE. J.RylandsL.WrightI. (2018). An interdisciplinary approach to designing online learning: Fostering pre-service mathematics teachers’ capabilities in mathematical modelling. ZDM, 50(1), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0920-x
25.
GikandiJ. W.MorrowD.DavisN. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
26.
GolderG.NorwichB.BaylissP. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach pupils with special educational needs in more inclusive schools: Evaluating a PGCE development. British Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2005.00377.x
27.
GoodwynF. D.HattonH. L.VannestK. J.GanzJ. B. (2013). Video modeling and video feedback interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 22(2), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561302200204
28.
GrossS.MokbelB.PaaßenB.HammerB.PinkwartN. (2014). Example-based feedback provision using structured solution spaces. International Journal of Learning Technology, 10, 9(3), 248-280. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2014.065752
HigbeeT. S.AportaA. P.ResendeA.NogueiraM.GoyosC.PollardJ. S. (2016). Interactive computer training to teach discrete trial instruction to undergraduates and special educators in Brazil. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(4), 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.329
31.
HulleyS. B.CummingsS. R.BrownerW. S.GradyD. G.NewmanT. B. (2013). Designing clinical research.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
32.
HumeK.SteinbrennerJ. R.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2
33.
JacobT.CentofantiS. (2024). Effectiveness of H5P in improving student learning outcomes in an online tertiary education setting. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09361-6
34.
JohnsonL. R. (2004). Research-based online course development for special education teacher preparation. Research-based online course development for special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(3), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700301
35.
KabashiL.KaczmarekL. A. (2017). Evaluating the efficacy of video-based instruction on improving social initiation skills of children with autism spectrum disorder: A review of literature. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 4(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-016-0098-5
36.
KellemsR. O.MorningstarM. E. (2012). Using video modeling delivered through iPods to teach vocational tasks to young adults with autism spectrum disorders. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35(3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728812443082
37.
Kent-WalshJ.McNaughtonD. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400006646
38.
KimS. Y.SongD. Y.KimY. A.BongG.KimJ.KimJ. H.YooH. J. (2020). How do children with autism spectrum disorder encode and reproduce visuospatial stimuli? Investigation into visuospatial processing abilities and styles. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(11), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0189
39.
LaiJ. W. M.BowerM. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412
40.
LeeM. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
41.
LiangZ.LeeD.ZuoJ.LiangS. (2024). The use of visual schedules to increase academic-related on-task behaviors of individuals with autism: A literature review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2024.2402124
42.
LightJ. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative communication interventions really make a difference? The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619912331278535
43.
MasonR. A.DavisH. S.BolesM. B.GoodwynF. (2013). Efficacy of point-of-view video modeling: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 34(6), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513486298
44.
McCoyA.McNaughtonD. (2021). Effects of online training on educators’ knowledge and use of system of least prompts to support augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Behavioral Education, 30(3), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09374-6
45.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB. S. (2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap? A perspective on the teacher shortage in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 29(5), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507312010
46.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB.BrownellM. T.MaheadyL.LewisT. J. (2019). What are high-leverage practices for special education teachers and why are they important?Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773477
47.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB.ZieglerD. (2018). Using high-leverage practices in teacher preparation to reduce the research-to-practice gap in inclusive settings. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 42(01), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2018.3
48.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.SeidN. H. (2009). Using a personal digital assistant to increase independent task completion by students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(10), 1420–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0761-0
49.
MutawaA. M.Al MuttawaJ. A. K.SruthiS. (2023). The effectiveness of using H5P for undergraduate students in the asynchronous distance learning environment. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084983
50.
NeelyL.RispoliM.GerowS.HongE. R. (2016). Preparing interventionists via telepractice in incidental teaching for children with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9250-7
51.
ParkJ.BouckE.DuenasA. (2019). The effect of video modeling and video prompting interventions on individuals with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418780464
52.
PloetznerR. (2022). The effectiveness of enhanced interaction features in educational videos: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2123002
53.
RaynerC.DenholmC.SigafoosJ. (2009). Video-based intervention for individuals with autism: Key questions that remain unanswered. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(2), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.09.001
54.
SchlosserR. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(4), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619912331278775
55.
Shukla-MehtaS.MillerT.CallahanK. J. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of video instruction on social and communication skills training for children with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357609352901
56.
SpanjersI. A.Van GogT.van MerriënboerJ. J. (2010). A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students' learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
57.
SpriggsA. D.MimsP. J.van DijkW.KnightV. F. (2017). Examination of the evidence base for using visual activity schedules with students with intellectual disability. The Journal of Special Education, 51(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916658483
58.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yucesoy- OzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
59.
SunX.BrockM. E. (2022). Systematic review of video-based instruction to teach employment skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221094793
60.
TestersL.GegenfurtnerA.van GeelR.Brand-GruwelS. (2019). From monocontextual to multicontextual transfer: Organizational determinants of the intention to transfer generic information literacy competences to multiple contexts. Frontline Learning Research, 7(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i1.359
61.
TetreaultA. S.LermanD. C. (2010). Teaching social skills to children with autism using point-of-view video modeling. Education & Treatment of Children, 33(3), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0105
62.
ThomasE. M.DeBarR. M.VladescuJ. C.TownsendD. B. (2020). A comparison of video modeling and video prompting by adolescents with ASD. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00402-0
63.
ThomasR. A.WestR. E.BorupJ. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003
64.
van DijkW.GageN. A. (2019). The effectiveness of visual activity schedules for individuals with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2018.1431761
65.
WainerA. L.IngersollB. R. (2013). Disseminating ASD interventions: A pilot study of a distance learning program for parents and professionals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1538-4
66.
WekerleC.DaumillerM.KollarI. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
67.
WinsorJ.TimmonsJ.ButterworthJ.MiglioreA.DominD.ZalewskaA.ShepardJ. (2021). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes through 2018: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.
68.
WrightJ. C.KnightV. F.BartonE. E. (2020). A review of video modeling to teach STEM to students with autism and intellectual disability. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 70, Article 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101476
69.
YakubovaG.ChenB. B. (2023). Parent-implemented video-based intervention to teach autistic children: An evidence-based systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10(4), 660–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-022-00316-8
