Interactive Multimedia Research Questions: Results from the Delphi Study

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the pedagogical possibilities afforded by interactive multimedia technology, and this interest spans such dimensions as content area and the student's developmental level and abilities. At the same time, teachers and researchers are concerned about how to best use this promising technology. The Center for Special Education Technology responded to this situation by conducting a Delphi study to identify research questions that should guide the study of interactive multimedia in special education.

The Delphi study was comprised of two questionnaires. In the first questionnaire, respondents were asked to identify the five most important research needs in interactive multimedia. These responses were compiled and then returned to respondents in a second questionnaire. In the second questionnaire, respondents performed two tasks. In the first task, they were asked to judge the importance of each response obtained from the first questionnaire. In the second task, they selected and justified responses that described the five most important multimedia research needs.

Descriptive analyses showed that respondents were most frequently concerned about design issues affecting the efficacy of educational interactive multimedia. These issues focused on instructional strategies and methods, the multimedia environment, navigational tools, and strategies for promoting transfer of skill. Two other themes emerged from this study. First, experts were interested in how the characteristics of persons with different disabilities affected the efficacy of educational interactive multimedia. Second, they were concerned about the technical and training resources that are needed to use multimedia in practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blackhurst

A.E.

(1977). Competency-based special education personnel preparation. In Kneedler

R.D.

Tarver

S.G.

(Eds.), Changing perspectives in special education (pp. 156–182). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merril.

Blackhurst

A.E.

MacArthur

C.A.

Byrom

E.M.

(1988). Microcomputing competencies for special education professors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 153–160.

Blanchard

J.S.

Rottenberg

C.J.

(1990, May). Hypertext and hypermedia: Discovering and creating meaningful learning and environments. The Reading Teacher, 656–661.

Bush

(1945, July). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 101–108.

The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored Instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2–10.

Conklin

(1987). Hypertext: An Introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 9, 17–41.

Duffy

T.M.

Knuth

R.A.

(in press). Hypermedia and instruction: Where is the match? In Jonassen

Mandl

(Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning. Heidelberg, FRG: Springer-Verlag.

Ferretti

R.P.

Cavalier

A.R.

(1991). Constraints on the problem solving of persons with mental retardation. In Bray

N.W.

(Ed.), International Review of research in Mental Retardation (Vol. 15). New York: Academic Press.

Gay

Raffensperger

(1989, September). Considerations and strategies in the design of interactive multimedia programs. Academic Computing, 24–25, 57–58, 73.

10.

Gerber

M.M.

(1988). Tolerance and technology of instruction: Implications for special education reform. Exceptional Children, 54, 309–314.

11.

Gerber

M.M.

(1990, September). A framework for a research and related activities on instructional technology and systems change. Paper commissioned by COSMOS Corporation. Washington, D.C.

12.

Goldman

S.R.

Semmel

D.S.

Cosden

M.A.

Gerber

M.M.

Semmel

M.I.

(1987). Special education administrator's policies and practices on microcomputing acquisition, allocation and access for mildly handicapped children: Interfaces with regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 330–339.

13.

Hasselbring

T.S.

Goin

L.I.

Wissick

(1989). Making knowledge meaningful: Applications of hypermedia. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 61–72.

14.

Kozma

R.B.

(1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.

15.

Lampert

Ball

D.L.

(1990, July). Using hypermedia technology to support a new pedagogy of teacher education (Issue Paper 90-5). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.

16.

Lauffer

(1978). Social planning at the community level. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

17.

Lave

(1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Layman

Hall

(1991). Applications of hypermedia in education. Computers and Education, 16, 113–119.

19.

Okolo

C.M.

(1990). Effects of an introductory computer course on special educators' attitudes and evaluations of instructional software. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 223–240.

20.

Perkins

D.N.

Salomon

(1989). Are cognitive skills context bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 16–25.

21.

Singley

M.K.

Anderson

A.R.

(1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Torgeson

J.K.

Kistner

J.A.

Morgan

(1987). Component processes in working memory. In Borkowski

J.G.

Day

J.D.

(Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp.49–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

23.

Tripp

S.D.

Roby

(1990). Orientation and disorientation in a hypertext lexicon. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 120–124.

24.

Turoff

(1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2, 140–171.

25.

Van Hanegan

Barron

Young

Williams

Vye

Bransford

J.D.

(in press). The Jasper series: An experiment with new ways to enhance mathematical thinking. In Halpern

(Ed.), Concerning the development of thinking skills in science and mathematics

26.

Yankelovich

(1987). Creating hypermedia material for English students. Sigcue-Outlook, 20, 1–11.