Using a Set-Aside to Encourage the Evaluation of Public Health Service Programs

Abstract

For over 20years, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has had the authority to use up to 1% of the annual Public Health Service (PHS) appropriations for the evaluation of federal health programs. However, recent changes to the Public Health Service Act put not only a ceiling (1%) but also afloor (0.2%) on the funds that the secretary can set asidefor evaluation. The changes to the legislation are intended to encourage HHS to dedicate more funds to evaluation, focus the funds set aside for evaluation on studies of PHS program implementation and effectiveness, and regularly report the findings of the evaluations to Congress. These changes respond to concerns raised by the U.S. General Accounting Office in a study of the PHS evaluation set-aside conducted for Congress.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chelimsky, E. (1987). The politics of program evaluation. Society, 25(1), 24-32.

Richardson, E. L. (1992). The value of evaluation. In C. G. Wye & R. C. Sonnichsen (Eds.), Evaluation in the federal government: Changes, trends, and opportunities. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Weiss, C. H. (1993). Where politics and evaluation meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93-106.