Audience reactions to Hollywood politics

Abstract

In this article I analyse people’s reactions to popular American movies and TV series about politics, in order to find out whether and how they use such stories to perform a ‘political self’. The material used for this study was selected from the Internet Movie Database and consisted of comments of viewers. The analysis produced four types of performance which show how particular movies and series enable people to think about the dilemmas that politicians and politics face (reflection), criticize or praise politicians for their morals and stories for their ideology (judgement) and express their hopes and ideals (fantasy). In addition, some stories give their viewers the feeling that they have acquired new knowledge about specific elements of politics, which provide them with means to describe what they see as politics (description). In contrast to ‘television malaise’ perspectives, the results suggest that people ‘do’ politics in relation to films and series and construct in their reactions a particular and public version of their political selves.

Keywords

citizenship performance of self political communication popular culture The West Wing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarts, K. and H. Semetko (2003) ` The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement ', Journal of Politics 65(3): 759—84 .

Austin, J. (1965) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Baum, M.A. (2002) ` Sex, Lies and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public ', American Political Science Review 96: 91—110 .

Baum, M.A. (2003) ` Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence, or Absence of Evidence? ', Political Communication 20(2): 173—90 .

Baum, M.A. (2005) ` Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit' , American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 213—34 .

Brownstein, R. (1992) The Power and the Glory: The Hollywood—Washington Connection. New York: Vintage Books .

Cairney, P. (1997) `Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Change' , paper presented to the 1997 Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, Jordanstown, N. Ireland.

Dahlgren, P. (1985) ` What's the Meaning of This? Viewers' Plural Sense-making of TV News' , Media, Culture & Society 10(3): 285—301 .

Eliasoph, N. (1990) ` Political Culture and the Presentation of a Political Self: A Study of the Public Sphere in the Spirit of Erving Goffman' , Theory and Society 19(4): 465—94 .

10.

Fiske, J. and J. Hartley (1978) Reading Television. London: Methuen .

11.

Gamson, W. (1992) Talking Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press .

12.

Garret, P. (2002) ` Yes Minister: Reviewing the “Looking After Children” Experience and Identifying the Messages for Social Work Research' , British Journal of Social Work 32: 831—46 .

13.

Graber, D. (2004) ` Mediated Politics and Citizenship in the Twenty-first Century', Annual Review of Psychology 55: 545—71 .

14.

Hagen, I. (1997) ` Communicating to an Ideal Audience: News and the Notion of the “Informed Citizen ” ', Political Communication 14: 405—19 .

15.

Hart, R. (1994) Seducing America: How Television Charms the Modern Voter. New York: Oxford University Press .

16.

Hofstetter, C. (1998) ` Political Talk Radio, Situational Involvement, and Political Mobilization' , Social Science Quarterly 79(2): 273—86 .

17.

Holbert, R.L. , O. Pillion , D.A. Tschida , G.G. Armfield , K. Kinder , K.L. Cherry et al. (2003) ` The West Wing as Endorsement of the US Presidency: Expanding the Bounds of Priming in Political Communication' , Journal of Communication 53(3): 427—43 .

18.

Hoopes, S. (1997) `Reforming the Public Sector: The British Case' , paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, Jordanstown, N. Ireland.

19.

Jones, J. (2005) Entertaining Politics: New Political Television and Civil Culture. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield .

20.

Letwin, O. (2003) Perspectives in Criminal Justice, Working Paper No. 10. Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Central England, Birmingham .

21.

Meyer, T. (2002) Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics . Cambridge: Polity Press .

22.

Neve, B. (1992) Film and Politics in America: A Social Tradition . London: Routledge .

23.

Neve, B. (2000) ` Frames of Presidential and Candidate Politics' , Javnost/The Public 7(2): 19—33 .

24.

Postman, N. (1985) Amusing Ourselves to Death. New York: Viking .

25.

Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality. London : Sage .

26.

Potter, J. and M. Wetherell (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage .

27.

Prior, M. (2003) ` Any News in Soft News? The Impact of Soft News Preferences on Political Knowledge' , Political Communication 20(2): 149—71 .

28.

Reichert, T. , J.E. Mueller and M. Nitz (2003) `Disengaged and Uninformed: 2000 Presidential Election Coverage in Consumer Magazines Popular with Young Adults' , Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80(3): 513—27 .

29.

Rollins, P.E. and J.E. O'Connor (2003) Hollywood's White House: The American Presidency in Film and History. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky .

30.

Scheuer, J. (2001) The Soundbite Society: How Television Helps the Right and Hurts the Left. New York: Routledge .

31.

Schudson, M. (2001) ` Politics as Cultural Practice' , Political Communication 18: 421—31 .

32.

Shen, F. (2004) ` Effects of News Frames and Schemas on Individuals' Issue Interpretations and Attitudes' , Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81(2): 400—16 .

33.

Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990) Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage .

34.

Zoonen, L. van (2005) Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield .