This article examines New Zealand print media representations of assisted reproductive and related biogenetic technologies, conceptualized as the products of a concordance of interest between media workers and reproductive specialists, biogenetic scientists and consumers. Such concordance is evident in the predominant use of media frames of anecdotal personalization and technoboosterism, which typically amplify the voices of proponents of emerging technologies while marginalizing and delegitimizing counterdiscourses. Thus, the perspectives of consumers and ‘expert’ sources are privileged at the expense of a more balanced assessment of the value and social, ethical, legal and health implications of assisted reproductive and related biogenetic technologies. Source dependence also detracts from much-needed recognition of the professional and financial interests at stake in the growing privatization and commercialization of these technologies, and in the local context potentially undermines journalistic independence and integrity.
Anderson, A. (2002) ` In Search of the Holy Grail: Media Discourse and the New Human Genetics' , New Genetics and Society21(3): 327—37 .
2.
Balakrishnan, R. (1994) `The Social Context of Sex Selection and the Politics of Abortion in India', pp. 267—86 in G. Sen and R. Snow (eds) Power and Decision: The Social Control of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies .
3.
Batty, L.P. (2002) `Assisted Reproductive Technology: The Aotearoa/New Zealand Policy Context', unpublished MA thesis, University of Canterbury , New Zealand.
4.
Bauer, M. (1998) ` The Medicalization of Science News — From the “Rocket-Scalpel” to the “Gene-Meteorite Complex ”', Social Science Information37(4): 731—51 .
5.
Bell, A. (1995) ` “ An Endangered Species”: Local Programming in the New Zealand Television Market' , Media, Culture & Society17(2): 181—200 .
6.
Betterton, R. (2002) Prima Gravida: Reconfiguring the Maternal Body in Visual Representation' , Feminist Theory3(3): 255—70 .
7.
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. , Y.S. Carmeli and R. Cohen (2000) ` Our First “IVF Baby”: Israel and Canada's Press Coverage of Procreative Technology ', International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy20(7): 1—39 .
8.
Bunkle, P. (1988) `Manufacturing Motherhood', pp. 92—101 in Second Opinion: The Politics of Women's Health in New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press .
9.
Condit, C.M. (1994) ` Hegemony in a Mass-Mediated Society: Concordance About Reproductive Technologies ', Critical Studies in Mass Communication11(3): 205—30 .
10.
Condit, C.M. (1996) `Media Bias for Reproductive Technologies', pp. 341—55 in R.L. Parrott and C.M. Condit (eds) Evaluating Women's Health Messages. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
11.
Coney, S. and A. Else (eds) (1999) Protecting our Future: The Case for Greater Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology — A Discussion Document . Auckland: Women's Health Action Trust.
12.
Conrad, P. (1997) ` Public Eyes and Private Genes: Historical Frames, News Constructions, and Social Problems' , Social Problems44(2): 139—54 .
13.
Conrad, P. (1999) ` Use of Expertise: Sources, Quotes, and Voice in the Reporting of Genetics in the News' , Public Understanding of Science8(4): 285—302 .
14.
Corner, J. , K. Richardson and N. Fenton (1990) ` Textualising Risk: TV Discourse and the Issue of Nuclear Energy ', Media, Culture & Society12(1): 105—24 .
15.
Daniels, K.R. (1988) ` Attitudes to Artificial Insemination by Donor and In Vitro Fertilisation — a Community Perspective', New ZealandSocial Work Review1(1): 4—10 .
16.
Dunwoody, S. (1986) `The Scientist as Source', pp. 3—15 in S.M. Friedman , S. Dunwoody and C. Rogers (eds) Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News. New York: Free Press .
17.
Durant, J. , A. Hansen and M. Bauer (1996) `Public Understanding of the New Genetics', pp. 235—48 in T. Marteau and M. Richards (eds) The Troubled Helix: The Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
18.
Einsiedel, E. (1992) ` Framing Science and Technology in the Canadian Press' , Public Understanding of Science1(1): 89—101 .
19.
Foucault, M. (1989 [1971]) `The Order of Discourse', pp. 221—33 in P. Rice and P. Waugh (eds) Modern Literary Theory: A Reader. London: Edward Arnold .
20.
Franklin, S. (1990) `Deconstructing “Desperateness”: The Social Construction of Infertility in Popular Representations of New Reproductive Technologies', pp. 200—29 in M. McNeil , I. Varcoe and S. Yearley (eds) The New Reproductive Technologies . London: Macmillan .
21.
Friedman, S.M. (1986) `The Journalist's World', pp. 17—41 in S.M. Friedman , S. Dunwoody and C. Rogers (eds) ( 1986) Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News . New York: Free Press .
22.
Gitlin, T. (1980) The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press .
23.
Hamilton, S.N. (2003) ` Traces of the Future: Biotechnology, Science Fiction, and the Media', Science FictionStudies30(2): 267—80 .
24.
Hudson, V.M. and A.M. den Boer (2004) Bare Branches: Security Implications of Asia's Surplus Male Population. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
25.
Huxford, J. (2000) ` Framing the Future: Science Fiction Frames and the Press Coverage of Cloning' , Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies14(2): 187—99 .
26.
Karpf, A. (1988) Doctoring the Media: The Reporting of Health and Medicine. London: Routledge .
27.
Kitzinger, J. and J. Reilly (1997) ` The Rise and Fall of Risk Reporting: Media Coverage of Human Genetics Research, “False Memory Syndrome” and “Mad Cow Disease ”', European Journal of Communication12(3): 319—50 .
28.
Lealand, G. (1998) `Journalists in New Zealand', pp. 109—24 in D.H. Weaver (ed.) The Global Journalist: News People Around the World. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press .
29.
Lealand, G. (2004) ` Still Young and Female: A (Modest) Survey of New Zealand Journalists ', Pacific Journalism Review10(2): 173—96 .
30.
Lewenstein, B.V. (1995) `Science and the Media', pp. 343—60 in S. Jasanoff , G.E. Markle , J.C. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
31.
Michelle, C. (2006a) `Media(ted) Fabrications: How the Science—Media Symbiosis Helped “Sell” Cord Banking' , Communication & Medicine3(1): 55—68 .
32.
Michelle, C. (2006b) `Transgressive Technologies? Strategies of Discursive Containment in the Representation and Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Aotearoa/New Zealand' , Women's Studies International Forum29(2): 109—24 .
33.
Nelkin, D. (1987) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H Freeman and Co.
34.
Nelkin, D. (1996) ` An Uneasy Relationship: The Tension Between Medicine and the Media' , Lancet347: 1600—3 .
35.
Nelkin, D. (2001) ` Beyond Risk: Reporting about Genetics in the Post-Asilomar Press' , Biology and Medicine44(2): 199—207 .
36.
Nelkin, D. and S. Lindee (1998) ` Media Portrayals of Genetics' , American Journal of Human Genetics63(2): 662—3 .
37.
Nerlich, B. , R. Dingwall and D. Clarke (2002) ` The Book of Life: How the Human Genome Project was Revealed to the Public' , Health6(5): 445—69 .
38.
New Zealand Law Reform Division (1986) New Birth Technologies: A Summary of Submissions Received on the Issues Paper . Wellington: Law Reform Division, Department of Justice .
39.
Nisbet, M. and B. Lewenstein (2002) ` Biotechnology and The American Media: The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970—1999 ', Science Communication23(4) 359—91 .
40.
Nisbet, M. , D. Brossard and A. Kroepsch (2003) ` Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics', Press /Politics8(2): 36—70 .
41.
Oomman, N. and B.R. Ganatra (2002) ` Sex Selection: The Systematic Elimination of Girls ', Reproductive Health Matters10(19): 184—8 .
42.
Parrott, R.L. and C.M. Condit (1996) `Priorities and Agendas in Communicating about Women's Reproductive Health', pp. 1—11 in R.L. Parrott and C.M. Condit (eds) Evaluating Women's Health Messages. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
43.
Petersen, A. (2001) ` Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media' , Social Science & Medicine52(8): 1255—68 .
44.
Philo, G. (1990) Seeing and Believing: The Influence of Television . London and New York: Routledge .
45.
Philo, G. (1993) `Getting the Message: Audience Research in the Glasgow University Media Group', pp. 253—70 in J. Eldridge (ed.) Getting the Message: News, Truth and Power . London: Routledge .
46.
Philp, M. (2005) `Cold Comfort Farm', Metro February: 47—53.
47.
Priest, S.H. (2001) A Grain of Truth: The Media, the Public and Biotechnology . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
48.
Rapp, R. (1988) ` Chromosomes and Communication: The Discourse of Genetic Counselling' , Medical Anthropology Quarterly2(2): 109—29 .
49.
Seguin, E. (2001) ` Narration and Legitimation: The Case of In Vitro Fertilization' , Discourse & Society12(2): 195—215 .
50.
Smart, A. (2003) ` Reporting the Dawn of the Post-genomic Era: Who Wants to Live Forever ?', Sociology of Health & Illness25(1): 24—49 .
51.
Stone, J.L. (1991) ` Contextualising Biogenetic and Reproductive Technologies ', Critical Studies in Mass Communication8(3): 309—32 .
52.
Sullivan, M. , P. Brownlett and N. Patton (2005) ` Private Umbilical Cord Blood Banking: A Biological Insurance of Dubious Future Benefit!' , New Zealand Medical Journal118(1208). URL (consulted February 2005): http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/118—1208/1260.
53.
Underwood, D. (2001) `Reporting and the Push for Market-oriented Journalism: Media Organizations as Businesses', pp. 99—117 in W.L. Bennett and R.M. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
54.
Van Dijck, J. (1995) Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent: Debating the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: New York University Press .
55.
Van Dijck, J. (1998) Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics. New York: New York University Press .
56.
Väliverronen, E. (2004) ` Stories of the “Medicine Cow”: Representations of Future Promises in Media Discourse' , Public Understanding of Science13(4): 363—77 . Weingart, P. (1998) ` Science and the Media' , Research Policy27: 869—79 .
57.
Zehr, S.C. (1999) `Scientists' Representations of Uncertainty', pp. 3—21 in S.M. Friedman , S. Dunwoody and C.L. Rogers (eds) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
