Measuring the Size of Working Memory in Very Young Children: The Imitation Sorting Task

Abstract

Development of working memory in the transitional period from infancy to preschool years was investigated from a neo-Piagetian perspective. A new task, the Imitation Sorting Task, was specifically designed for this purpose. The task involves a game of imitation. An increasing number of disparate objects are sorted into two containers and the child is asked to reproduce each demonstrated sorting. The number of objects in the largest set that the child can successfully sort in imitation determines the child's score on the task. The task was administered three times to children from 12 to 36 months of age. Scores increased in a linear fashion with age in all three administrations. Upon retesting within a few weeks after the original administration, children's score and rank remained very similar. Their score increased at the follow-up after 6 months, but their rank still remained similar to their original rank. The age-related increase in the scores appears to be about one unit every six months in this age range.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alp, I.E. (1992, September). A task analysis of the Imitation Sorting Task . Paper presented at the Vth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Seville, 6-9 September.

Anastasi, A. (1990). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan .

Burtis, P.J. (1982). Capacity increase and chunking in the development of short-term memory . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 387-413 .

Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Orlando, FL: Academic Press .

Gopnik, A. , & Meltzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorization in the second year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments . Child Development, 58, 1523-1531 .

Myers, N.A. , & Perlmutter, M. (1978). Memory in the years from two to five. In P.A. Ornstein (Ed.), Memory development in children (pp. 191-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages . Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345 .

Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development . International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531-570 .

Pascual-Leone, J. , & Goodman, D. (1979). Intelligence and experience: A neo-Piagetian approach . Instructional Science, 8, 301-367 .

10.

Pascual-Leone, J. , Goodman, D. , Ammon, P. , & Subelman, I. (1978). Piagetian theory and neo-Piagetian analysis as psychological guides in education. In J.M. Callagher & J.A. Easley (Eds.), Knowledge and development (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum .

11.

Pascual-Leone, J. , & Ijaz, H. (1989). Mental capacity testing as a form of intellectualdevelopmental assessment. In R.J. Samuda , S.L. Kong , J. Cummins , J. Pascual-Leone , & J. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 143-171). Toronto: Hogrefe .

12.

Pascual-Leone, J. , & Johnson, J. (1991). Psychological unit and its role in task analysis: A reinterpretation of object permanence. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (Eds.), Criteria for competence: Controversies in the assessment of children's abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

13.

Riccuiti, H. (1965). Object grouping and selective ordering behavior in infants 12 to 24 months old . Merill Palmer Quarterly, 11, 129-148 .

14.

Sugarman, S. (1982). Developmental change in early representational intelligence: Evidence from spatial classification strategies and related verbal expressions . Cognitive Psychology, 14, 410-449 .