Conceptions of the Internet in Everyday Life Information Seeking

Abstract

Based on the interviews of 18 people in Finland in 2001-2, conceptions of the Internet as an information source were explored. In general, the conceptions reflect the acceptability, accessibility and usability of Internet sources. Most conceptions appeared to be quite impressionistic, reflecting the basic difficulty of describing the constantly changing nature of the Internet. Two major kinds of Internet conceptions were identified. First, in metaphorical conceptions, the Internet was primarily conceived in terms of space or place, for example, a library or a bazaar. Second, conceptions based on actual use experiences of the Internet significantly drew on quality judgments of the networked services. Since a growing number of information sources of various types are competing for people’s attention, general level conceptions of sources and channels will gain importance as a criterion by which sources will be accepted or rejected. This seems to be a particular characteristic of networked information environments.

Keywords

internet world wide web information seeking behaviour user expectations user satisfaction perceptions mental models selection information sources

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] C.W. Choo , B. Detlor and D. Turnbull , Web Work. Information Seeking and Knowledge Work on the World Wide Web ( Kluwer, Dordrecht , 2000).

[2] P. Wilson , Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance. Toward a Library and Information Policy ( Greenwood Press, Westport , 1977).

[3] J. Kari and R. Savolainen , Towards a contextual model of information seeking on the Web , The New Review of Information Behaviour Research 4 (2003) 155-175 .

[4] P.E.N. Howard , L. Rainie , and S. Jones , Days and nights on the Internet. In: B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds), The Internet in Everyday Life ( Blackwell, Oxford , 2002).

[5] J. Katz and R.E. Rice , Social Consequences of Internet Use. Access, Involvement and Interaction ( MIT Press, Cambridge , 2002).

[6] J.S. Watson , “If you don’t have it, you can find it.” A close look at students’ perceptions of using technology , Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(11) (1998) 1024-1036 .

[7] N. Ford , D. Miller and N. Moss , The role of individual differences in Internet searching: an empirical study , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(12) (2001) 1049-1066 .

[8] C. Scull , A. Milewski and D. Millen , Envisioning the Web: user expectations about the cyber-experience . In: L. Woods (ed.), ASIS ’99: Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting (Information Today, Medford, 1999).

[9] H. Bruce , Perceptions of the Internet: what people think when they search the Internet for information , Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 9(3) (1999) 187-199 .

10.

[10] T.G. McFadden , Understanding the Internet: model, metaphor and analogy , Library Trends 50(1) (2001) 87-109 .

11.

[11] G. Lakoff and M. Johnson , Conceptual metaphor in everyday language , Journal of Philosophy 77(8) (1980) 453-486 .

12.

[12] H. Bruce , The User’s View of the Internet ( Scarecrow Press, Lanham , 2002).

13.

[13] D.J. Slone , The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during Web interaction , Journal of the American Journal of Information Science and Technology 53(13) (2002) 1152-1169 .

14.

[14] S.J.Rieh , Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(2) (2002) 145-161 .

15.

[15] C.N. Wathen and J. Burkell , Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the Web , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(2) (2002) 134-144 .