Numerous scholars and practitioners claim that motivational factors can facilitate successful knowledge sharing. However, little empirical research has been conducted examining the different kinds of motivation (extrinsic and intrinsic) used to explain employee knowledge sharing behaviors. By integrating a motivational perspective into the theory of reasoned action (TRA), this study examines the role of both extrinsic (expected organizational rewards and reciprocal benefits) and intrinsic (knowledge self-efficacy and enjoyment in helping others) motivators in explaining employee knowledge sharing intentions. Based on a survey of 172 employees from 50 large organizations in Taiwan, this study applies the structural equation modeling approach to investigate the research model. The results showed that motivational factors such as reciprocal benefits, knowledge self-efficacy, and enjoyment in helping others were significantly associated with employee knowledge sharing attitudes and intentions. However, expected organizational rewards did not significantly influence employee attitudes and behavior intentions regarding knowledge sharing. Implications for organizations are discussed.
R. M. Grant, Toward a knowledge-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal17 (1996) 109-122.
2.
T. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
3.
G. Widen-Wulff and M. Ginman, Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital, Journal of Information Science30(5) (2004) 448-458.
4.
J. Dyer and K. Nobeoka, Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case, Strategic Management Journal21(3) (2000) 345-367.
5.
P. van Baalen, J. Bloemhor-Ruwaard and E. van Heck, Knowledge sharing in an emerging network of practice: the role of a knowledge portal, European Management Journal23(3) (2005) 300-314.
6.
S. W. Chou and Y. H. Tsai, Knowledge creation: individual and organizational perspectives, Journal of Information Science30(3) (2004) 205-218.
7.
Y. M. Mei, S. T. Lee and S. Al-Hawamdeh, Formulating a communication strategy for effective knowledge sharing, Journal of Information Science30(1) (2004) 12-22.
8.
A. Styhre, The knowledge-intensive company and the economy of sharing: rethinking utility and knowledge management, Knowledge and Process Management9(4) (2002) 228-236.
9.
H. Lee and B. Choi, Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems20(1) (2003) 179-228.
10.
S. Moffett, R. McAdam and S. Parkinson, An empirical analysis of knowledge management applications, Journal of Knowledge Management7(3) (2003) 6-26.
11.
M. C. Jones, M. Cline and S. Ryan, S. Exploring knowledge sharing in ERP implementation: an organizational culture framework, Decision Support Systems41(2) (2006) 411-434.
12.
P. A. C. Smith, Knowledge sharing and strategic capital: the importance and identification of opinion leaders, The Learning Organization12(6) (2005) 563-574.
13.
P. A. C. Smith and H. Saint-Onge, The evolutionary organization: avoiding a Titanic fate, The Learning Organization3(4) (1996) 4-21.
14.
R. McDermott and C. O’Dell, Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge, Journal of Knowledge Management5(1) (2001) 76-85.
15.
V. H. Vroom, Work and Motivation (John Wiley, New York, 1964).
16.
R. Fenwick and J. Olson, Support for worker participation: attitudes among union and non-union workers, American Sociological Review51(4) (1986) 505-522.
17.
E. L. Deci and R. Flaste, Why We Do What We Do: The Dynamics of Personal Autonomy (Putnam, New York, 1995).
18.
M. Osterloh and B. Frey, Motivation, knowledge, transfer, and organizational forms, Organization Science11(5) (2000) 538-550.
19.
M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitudes, Intentions and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1975).
20.
M. K. Chang, Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior, Journal of Business Ethics17(6) (1998) 1825-1834.
21.
D. Njite and H. G. Parsa, Structural equation modeling of factors that influence consumer Internet purchase intentions of services, Journal of Services Research5(1) (2005) 43-60.
22.
T. E. Slocombe, Applying the theory of reasoned action to the analysis of an individual’s polychronicity, Journal of Managerial Psychology14(3) (1999) 313-322.
23.
J. K. Liker and A. A. Sindi, User acceptance of expert systems: a test of the theory of reasoned action, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management14(2) (1997) 147-173.
24.
G. W. Bock, R. W. Zmud and Y. G. Kim, Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 87-111.
25.
T. R. Tyler and S. L. Blader, Identity and cooperative behavior in groups, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations4(3) (2001) 207-226.
26.
S. C. Fang, F. S. Tsai and K. C. Chang, Knowledge sharing routines, task efficiency, and team service quality in instant service-giving settings, Journal of the American Academy of Business6(1) (2005) 62-67.
27.
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, The support of autonomy and the control of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53(6) (1987) 1024-1037.
28.
F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi and P. R. Warshaw, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology22 (1992) 1111-1132.
29.
J. W. Moon and Y. G. Kim, Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context, Information and Management38(4) (2001) 217-230.
30.
T. S. H. Teo, V. K. G. Lim and R. Y. C. Lai, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage, OMEGA International Journal of Management Science27(1) (1999) 25-37.
31.
V. Venkatesh and C. Speier, Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes79(1) (1999) 1-28.
32.
J. M. George and A. P. Brief, Motivational agendas in the workplace: the effects of feelings on focus of attention and work motivation, Research in Organizational Behavior18 (1996) 75-109.
33.
L. Lu, Work motivation, job stress and employees’ well-being, Journal of Applied Management Studies8(1) (1999) 61-72.
34.
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, New York, 1985).
35.
R. J. Vallerand, Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory: a view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, Psychological Inquiry11(4) (2000) 312-318.
36.
E. L. Deci, Intrinsic Motivation (Plenum Press, New York, 1975).
37.
A. Bandura, Social Learning Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1977).
38.
A. Kankanhalli, B. C. Y. Tan and K. K. Wei, Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology56(11) (2005) 1156-1166.
39.
H. H. Kelly and J. W. Thibaut, Interpersonal Relationships: a Theory of Interdependence (Wiley, New York, 1978).
40.
D. G. Ko, L. J. Kirsch and W. R. King, Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise systems implementations, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 59-85.
41.
D. Constant, S. Kiesler and L. Sproull, What’s mine is ours or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing, Information Systems Research5(4) (1994) 400-421.
42.
D. Constant, L. Sproull and S. Kiesler, The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice, Organization Science7(2) (1996) 119-135.
43.
M. M. Wasko and S. Faraj, It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice, Journal of Strategic Information Systems9(2) (2000) 155-173.
44.
R. F. Baumeister, A self-presentational view of social phenomena, Psychological Bulletin91(1) (1982) 3-26.
45.
K. Bartol and A. Srivastava, Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems, Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies19(1) (2002) 64-76.
46.
L. A. Damodaran and W. Olpher, Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems, Behaviour and Information Technology19(6) (2000) 405-413.
47.
D. Weir and K. Hutchings, Cultural embeddedness and contextual constraints: knowledge sharing in Chinese and Arab cultures, Knowledge and Process Management12(2) (2005) 89-98.
48.
J. T. Yang, Job-related knowledge sharing: comparative case studies, Journal of Knowledge Management8(3) (2004) 118-126.
49.
S. Ryu, S. H. Ho and I. Han, Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals, Expert Systems with Applications25(1) (2003) 113-122.
50.
J. Kowal and M. S. Fortier, Motivational determinants of flow: contributions from self-determination theory, The Journal of Social Psychology139(3) (1999) 355-368.
51.
K. M. Bartol and E. A. Locke, Incentives and motivation. In: S. Rynes and B. Gerhardt (eds), Compensation in Organization: Progress and Prospects (Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA, 2000) 104-147.
52.
A. B. Hargadon, Firms as knowledge brokers: lessons in pursuing continuous innovation, California Management Review40(3) (1998) 209-227.
53.
P. M. Blau, Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley, New York, 1964).
54.
P. Kollock, The economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in Cyberspace. In M. Smith and P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace (Routledge, New York, 1999) 220-239.
55.
M. M. Wasko and S. Faraj, Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 35-57.
56.
A. Kankanhalli, B. C. Y. Tan and K. K. Wei, Contributing knowledge to electronic repositories: an empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 113-143.
57.
A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: a Social Cognitive Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1986).
58.
G. W. Bock and Y. G. Kim, Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing, Information Resource Management Journal15(2) (2002) 14-21.
59.
F. Luthans, Positive organizational behavior: developing and managing psychological strengths, Academy of Management Executive16(1) (2003) 57-75.
60.
D. W. Organ, Organizational Citizenship Behavior: the Good Soldier Syndrome (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1988).
61.
G. M. Spreitzer, Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation, Academy of Management Journal38(5) (1995) 1442-1465.
62.
S. Taylor and P. A. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models, Information Systems Research6(2) (1995) 144-176.
63.
K. G. Joreskog and D. Sorbom, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling (Scientific Software International, Chicago, 1996).
64.
J. F. Hair, R. L. Anderson and W. C. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1998).
65.
R. H. Hoyle, Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (Sage, London, 1995).
66.
J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994).
67.
W. W. Chin, A. Gopal and W. D. Salisbury, Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation, Information Systems Research8(4) (1997) 342-367.
68.
C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research18(1) (1981) 39-50.
69.
R. P. Bagozzi and Y. Yi, On the evaluation of structural equation model, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16(1) (1988) 74-94.
70.
M. W. Browne and R. Cudeck, Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit (Sage, Newbury Park, 1993).
71.
H. F. Lin and G. G. Lee, Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge-sharing behaviour, Management Decision42(1) (2004) 108-125.
72.
S. Ba, J. Stallaert and A. B. Whinston, Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design - the case for incentive alignment, Information Systems Research12(3) (2001) 225-239.
73.
M. Beer and N. Nohria, Cracking the code of change, Harvard Business Review78(3) (2000) 133-141.
74.
C. Macneil, The supervisor as a facilitator of informal learning in work teams, Journal of Workplace Learning13(6) (2001) 246-253.
75.
S. S. Masterson, K. Lewis, B. M. Goldman and M. S. Taylor, Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships, Academy of Management Journal43(4) (2000) 738-748.
76.
H. C. Kelman, Compliance, identification, and internalisation: three processes of attitude change, Journal of Conflict Resolution2 (1958) 51-60.
77.
J. W. Scott, Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology, Journal of Management Information Systems17(2) (2000) 81-113.
78.
K. Alfie, Why incentive plans cannot work, Harvard Business Review71(5) (1993) 54-60.
79.
D. Hislop, Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment, Employee Relations25(2) (2003) 182-202.
80.
S. K. Parker, Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the role of job enrichment and other organizational interventions, Journal of Applied Psychology83(6) (1998) 835-852.
81.
C. E. Connelly and E. K. Kelloway, Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge cultures, Leadership and Organization Journal24(5) (2003) 294-301.
82.
I. Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2) (1991) 179-211.
