The typical structure of a scientific report involves highly standardized sections. The key concept of a scientific report is the reproducibility of results. Because not only clarity but also conciseness is a tool for the advancement of science, a new format using nested tables is proposed with the aim of improving the design of short reports in scientific journals, namely short communications, short technical reports, case reports, etc. This format is based on the ergonomic philosophy of visual encyclopaedias (one topic, one page) and on the quality system of the Deming's cycle (plan—do—check—act) for continuous improvement. This new editing tool has several advantages over existing forms, because it provides quick and ergonomic, reader-friendly research reports that, at the same time, would render a saving in terms of available space and publishing costs of the printed version of scientific journals.
S. Liebesman , Implementing ISO 9001:2000: US survey of user experiences, ISO Management Systems2(6) (2002) 39—47.
2.
F.W. Taylor , The Principles of Scientific Management (Harper, New York/ London, 1911) [ Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish, MT, 2004].
3.
N.R. Senapati , Six Sigma: myths and realities, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management21(6) (2004) 683—690.
4.
W.A. Shewhart , Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control (Department of Agriculture Graduate School, Washington, DC, 1939) [Dover Publications , Mineola, NY, 1986 ].
5.
American Society for Quality (ASQ), Continuous Improvement: Overview (n.d.). Available at: http://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/continuous-improvement/overview/overview.html (accessed 27 April 2007).
6.
J.B. Washbush , Deming: a new philosophy or another voice? , Management Decision40(10) (2002) 1029—1036.
7.
A. Háry and D. Klujber, Assessment approaches and strategies for the quality system improvement, Social and Management Sciences (Periodica Polytechnica) 9(2) (2001) 127—139.
8.
L. Yueh Kwong, Introduction to Green Productivity Concepts in the Context of Industrial Estates (2001). Available at: http://www.apo-tokyo.org/gp/e_publi/penang_symp/Penang_Symp_P36—46.pdf (accessed 27 April 2007).
9.
S.T. Foster, Managing Quality: An Integrative Approach (Pearson Education /Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000).
10.
R. McMurtrie and N.K. Cupta, Quality: the timeless quest, Engineering Management13(2) (2003) 22—25.
11.
T. Perneger , New editor for a quality journal, International Journal for Quality in Health Care16(1) (2004) 1—2 [Editorial].
P.-N. Hsieh , P.-L. Chang and K.-H. Lu , Quality management approaches in libraries and information services, Libri50(3) (2000) 191—201.
14.
P.E. Regan and B.H. Kleiner, New developments in improving quality management in research and development, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology69(1) (1997) 26—30.
15.
N. Ertl, A new way of documenting scientific data from medical publications , Karger Gazette20 (27 November) ( 1969) 1—3.
16.
F. Salager-Meyer , Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: a genre analysis per research- and text-type, Text10(4) (1990) 365—384.
17.
Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature, A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles, Annals of Internal Medicine106(4) ( 1987) 598—604.
18.
E.J. Huth , Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials, Annals of Internal Medicine106(4) (1987) 626—627.
19.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, Journal of the American Medical Association269(17) ( 1993) 2282—2286.
20.
A. Taddio , T. Pain, F.F. Fassos, H. Boon, A.L. Ilersich and T.R. Einarson, Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association, Canadian Medical Association Journal150(10) (1994) 1611—1615.
21.
J. Hartley , Applying ergonomics to Applied Ergonomics: using structured abstracts, Applied Ergonomics30(6) (1999) 535—541.
22.
J. Hartley , Do structured abstracts take more space? And does it matter?, Journal of Information Science28(5) (2002) 417—422.
23.
J. Hartley , Current findings from research on structured abstracts, Journal of the Medical Library Association92(3) (2004) 368—371.
24.
S. Sharma and J.E. Harrison, Structured abstracts: do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics130(4) (2006) 523—530.
25.
T. Nakayama , N. Hirai, S. Yamazaki and M. Naito, Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract , Journal of the Medical Library Association93(2) (2005) 237—242.
26.
J. Lin, D. Karakos, D. Demner-Fushman and S. Khudanpur, Generative content models for structural analysis of medical abstracts . In: Association for Computational Linguistics (ed.), Linking Natural Language Processing and Biology: Towards Deeper Biological Literature Analysis, Proceedings of the BioNLP'06 Workshop (Omnipress, Madison, WI, 2006) 65—72.
27.
E.J. Huth and K. Case, Annals of Internal Medicine at age 75: reflections on the past 25 years, Annals of Internal Medicine137(1) (2002) 34—45.
28.
P. Hortolà , Using an SEM as an ESEM to study minute human bloodstains on stainless steel, Microscopy and Analysis20(6) (2006) 15—17 (UK) 5—7 (EU) 23—25 (US) 11—13 (AP).
