Virtual communities are centred upon computer-mediated communication, with participants interacting to provide specific knowledge to each other that enables them to perform common functions, to learn from each other and to build upon their collective knowledge. Without the existence of rich knowledge bases, computer-mediated virtual communities are of limited value. Therefore, the significance of member-generated knowledge cannot be over-emphasized. In this paper, our goal is to examine the roles of identity and organizational citizenship behaviour in facilitating knowledge transfer in computer-mediated communication contexts such as virtual communities. Our findings support the assertion that self-presentation and organizational citizenship behaviour are crucial determinants of important community outcomes. We concluded that self-presentation could be a key variable for contributing knowledge in online communities. This study has important implications for academic researchers and practitioners who seek to understand why community members share their knowledge with strangers in online communities.
M.H. Hsu , T.L. Ju , C.H. Yen and C.M. Chang, Knowledge sharing behaviour in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy and outcome expectation , International Journal of Human- Computer Studies65 (2007) 153-69.
2.
C.M. Chiu, M.H. Hsu and E. Wang, Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories, Decision Support Systems42 (2006) 1872-88.
3.
S.W. Chou and Y.H. Tsai, Knowledge creation: individual and organizational perspectives, Journal of Information Science30(3) (2004) 205-18.
4.
J.W. Thibaut and H.H. Kelley, The Social Psychology of Groups (John Wiley, Chichester, 1959).
5.
B.K. Thorn and T. Connolly, Discretionary data bases. a theory and some experimental findings, Communication Research14(5) (1987) 512-28.
6.
T.H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998).
7.
C. Yu and T. Chu , Exploring knowledge contribution from an OCB perspective, Information & Management44 (2007) 321-31.
8.
M. Ma and R. Agarwal, Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities , Information Systems Research18(1) (2007) 42-67.
9.
S.K. Whitbourne and L.A. Connolly, The developing self in midlife. In: S.L. Willis, J.D. Reid (eds), Life in the Middle: Psychological and Social Development in Middle Age (Academic Press, New York, 1999) 25-45.
10.
H. Markus and E. Wurf, The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective, Annual Review of Psychology38 (1987) 299-337.
11.
S. Fournier , Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research24(4) ( 1998) 343-73.
12.
J. Zheng and H.W. Kim, Investigating knowledge contribution from the online identity perspective , Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS, Montreal 2007).
13.
B.E. Ashforth and F. Mael, Social identity theory and the organization , Academy of Management Review14(1) (1989) 20-39.
14.
R.F. Baumeister , The self. In: D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998) 680-740.
15.
M.A. Hogg and D. Abrams, Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes ( Routledge, London, 1988).
T.M. Newcomb , The Acquaintance Process ( Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1961).
18.
C. Jensen, J. Davis and S. Farnham, Finding others online: reputation systems for social online spaces, CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ( ACM Press, New York, 2002) 447-54.
19.
M.S. Ackerman , Augmenting the organizational memory: a field study of answer garden, ACM Transactions on Information Systems16(3) ( 1998) 203-24.
20.
J.S. Donath, Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: M.A. Smith, P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace (Routledge, New York, 1999) 29-59.
21.
A. Willem , H. Scarbrough and M. Buelens, Impact of coherent versus multiple identities on knowledge integration, Journal of Information Science34 (2008) 370-86.
22.
H. Hall, Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets, Journal of Information Science27(3) (2001) 139-46.
23.
T.R. Tyler and S.L. Blader, Identity and co-operative behaviour in groups, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations4(3) (2001) 207-26.
24.
G. Widén-Wulff and M. Ginman, Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital, Journal of Information Science30(5) (2004) 448-58.
25.
S. Harter, The Construction of Self (Guilford, New York, 1998).
26.
G.H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1934).
27.
E. Goffman, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour (Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1967).
28.
W.B. Swann , L.P. Milton and J.T. Polzer, Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness, J of Personality and Social Psychology79(2) (2000) 238-50.
29.
G. Hertel , S. Niedner and S. Herrmann, Motivation of software developers in open source project: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux Kernel, Research Policy32(7) (2003) 1159-77.
30.
A.L. Blanchard and M.L. Markus, The experienced ‘sense’ of a virtual community: characteristics and processes, Database for Advances in Information Systems35(1) (2004) 65-79.
31.
D.W. Organ and M. Konovsky, Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behaviour , Journal of Applied Psychology74 (1989) 157-64.
32.
C.I. Barnard , The Functions of the Executive ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1938).
33.
D. Katz and R.L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organizations (Wiley, New York, 1966).
34.
Y.M. Mei , S.T. Lee and S. Al-Hawamdeh, Formulating a communication strategy for effective knowledge sharing, Journal of Information Science30(1) ( 2004) 12-22.
35.
D. Katz, The motivational basis of organizational behaviour, Behavioral Science9 (1964) 131-3.
36.
C.A. Smith, D.W. Organ and J.P. Near, Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents, Journal of Applied Psychology68(4) (1983) 653-63.
37.
M.M. Wasko and S. Faraj, Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 35-57.
38.
W.N. Widmeyer , L.R. Brawley and A.V. Carron, The Measurement of Cohesiveness in Sports Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire (Sports Dynamics , London, Ontario, 1985).
39.
K.B. Henry , H. Arrow and B. Carini, A tripartite model of group identification - theory and measurement, Small Group Research30(5) (1999) 558-81.
40.
S.H. Budman , S. Soldz, A. Demby, M. Davis and J. Merry, What is cohesiveness? An empirical investigation , Small Group Research24 ( 1993) 199-216.
41.
S.G. Cohen and D.E. Bailey, What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Journal of Management23 (1997) 239-90.
42.
P. Herriet and C. Pemberton, Facilitating new deals, Human Resource Management Journal7 ( 1997) 45-56.
43.
Y. Wiener , Forms of value systems: a focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance, Academy of Management Review10 (1988) 536-52.
44.
M.A. Hogg, The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity (New York University Press, New York, 1992).
45.
R.L. Moreland and J.M. Levine, Role transitions in small groups. In: V. Allen, E. Van De Vliert (eds), Role Transitions: Explorations and Explanations (Plenum, New York, 1984).
46.
S.J. Wayne and S.A. Green, The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behaviour, Human Relations46(12) (1993) 1431-40.
47.
A.G. Armstrong and J. Hagel, The real value of online communities, Harvard Business Review (1996) 134-41.
48.
M. Igbaria and J.H. Greenhaus, The career advancement prospects of managers and professionals: are MIS employees unique?, Decision Sciences23(2) (1992) 478-500.
49.
C.A. Bowers , J.A. Pharmer and E. Salas, When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - a meta-analysis, Small Group Research31(3) (2000) 305-27.
50.
J.L. Farh , P.C. Earley and S.C. Lin , Impetus for action: a cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behaviour in Chinese society, Administrative Science Quarterly42 ( 1997) 421-44.
51.
C. Fornell and D. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research18 (1981) 39-50.
52.
Y. Yoo and M. Alavi, Media and group cohesion: relative influences on social presence, task, participation, and group consensus, MIS Quarterly25(3) (2001) 371-90.
53.
W.W. Chin, The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: G.A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Mahwah, NJ, 1998).
54.
B.K. Brockman and R.M. Morgan, The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34(3) (2006) 295-307.
55.
R.W. Woodman , J.E. Sawyer and R.W. Griffin, Toward a theory of organizational creativity , Academy of Management Review18(2) (1993) 293-321.
56.
M.E. Adams , G.S. Day and D. Dougherty, Enhancing new product development performance: an organizational learning perspective, Journal of Product Innovation Management15(5) (1998) 403-422.
57.
G.S. Lynn , R.B. Skov, and K.D. Abel, Practices that support team learning and their impact on speed to market and new product success? Journal of Product Innovation Management16(5) (1999) 439-54.
