Open data is reshaping research by enhancing transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration. This review analyzes more than 120 peer-reviewed studies (2021–2025) to evaluate their impact on academic collaboration and productivity, especially in emerging countries like Saudi Arabia. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, we find consistent links between open data and increased citations, co-authorship, and interdisciplinary work, for example, genome-wide studies with shared data saw up to 81.8% more citations. However, openness is uneven: environmental and life sciences lead in principles of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable data (FAIR) compliance, while engineering and materials science trail. North America and Europe dominate open data infrastructure, although Saudi Arabia shows policy-driven progress under Vision 2030. Key barriers include data quality concerns, lack of incentives, ethical constraints, and limited infrastructure in low-resource contexts. This review highlights thematic patterns, visualizes trends, and offers recommendations to improve practices and foster inclusive global research collaboration.
Jean-QuartierCKleinberger-PiererHZachB, et al. Fostering open data practices in research-performing organizations. Publications2024; 12(2): 15.
2.
KunzR. Opening access, closing the knowledge gap? Analysing GC No. 25 on the right to science and its implications for the global science system in the digital age. Z Ausl Öffentl Recht Völkerr2021; 81(1): 23–46.
3.
BorgesiusFZGrayJvan EechoudM.Open data, privacy and fair information principles: towards a balancing framework. Berkeley Technol Law J2015; 30(3): 2073–2131.
4.
SmithAKAyanianJZCovinskyKE, et al. Conducting high-value secondary dataset analysis: an introductory guide and resources. J Gen Intern Med2011; 26(8): 920–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1621-5
Ling-HuTRios-GuzmanELorenzo-RedondoR, et al. Challenges and opportunities for global genomic surveillance strategies in the COVID-19 era. Viruses2022; 14(11): 2532.
7.
ManiZAGoniewiczK.Transforming healthcare in Saudi Arabia: a comprehensive evaluation of vision 2030’s impact. Sustainability2024; 16(8): 3277.
8.
AwasthiSDasSTripathiM.Gold open access publishing in ASEAN countries: a comparative study. J Scientometr Res2025; 13(3s): s98–s123.
O’DeaRELagiszMJennionsMD, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension. Biol Rev2021; 96(5): 1695–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12721
11.
HradeckáL. Tailoring organizational support services for research data management in the open science context: service self-assessment tool pilot. Master’s Thesis, L. Hradecká, https://oulurepo.oulu.fi/handle/10024/46533 (2023, accessed 23 April 2025).
12.
ColavizzaGCadwalladerLLaFlammeM, et al. An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations. PLoS ONE2024; 19(10): e0311493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311493
13.
XuMMaXQiaoW, et al. Characterizing collaborative networks for different arctic issues based on complex network analysis. Ocean Coast Manag2024; 255: 107216.
14.
ProsserAMBHamshawRJTMeyerJ, et al. When open data closes the door: a critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. Br J Soc Psychol2023; 62(4): 1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576
15.
HannahKHaddawayNRFullerRA, et al. Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: barriers and perspectives. Res Synth Methods2024; 15(3): 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1699
16.
QuaratiARaffaghelliJE.Do researchers use open research data? Exploring the relationships between usage trends and metadata quality across scientific disciplines from the Figshare case. J Inf Sci2022; 48(4): 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520961048
NagarajATrancheroM.How Does Data Access Shape Science? The Impact of Federal Statistical Research Data Centers on Economics Research. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research; 2023Jun. Report No.: 31372.
TamuhlaTLulambaETMutemaringaT, et al. Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research. BMJ Global Health2023; 8(10): e013092.
Cunha-OliveiraTIoannidisJPAOliveiraPJ. Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research. Physiol Rev2024; 104(3): 1387–1408. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00043.2023
28.
SpechtACrowstonK.Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2022; 17(11):e0278043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278043
29.
AhmedMOthmanRNoordinMF, et al. Factors influencing open science participation through research data sharing and reuse among researchers: a systematic literature review. Knowl Inf Syst2025; 67(3): 2801–2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02284-3
Lucas-DominguezRAlonso-ArroyoAVidal-InferA, et al. The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientometrics2021; 126(6): 4975–4990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03971-6
32.
HuddlestonJBedfordT.Timely vaccine strain selection and genomic surveillance improves evolutionary forecast accuracy of seasonal influenza A/H3N2. medRxiv, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11419249/ (2024, accessed 24 November 2025).
NebieEIvan EeuwijkPSawadogoHN, et al. Operational differences between product development partnership, pharmaceutical industry, and investigator initiated clinical trials. Trop Med Infect Dis2024; 9(3): 56.
35.
LedvinaVEPalmerioEMcGranaghanRM, et al. How open data and interdisciplinary collaboration improve our understanding of space weather: a risk and resiliency perspective. Front Astron Space Sci2022; 9: 1067571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1067571
36.
UgochukwuAIPhillipsPW.Open data ownership and sharing: challenges and opportunities for application of FAIR principles and a checklist for data managers. J Agric Food Res2024; 16: 101157.
Saudi Arabia's Open Science Community Association (OSCA). Open Science in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: OSCA; 2021.
40.
MullenLB.Open access, scholarly communication, and open science in psychology: an overview for researchers. Sage Open2024; 14(1_suppl): 21582440231205390. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231205390
SubaveerapandiyanAAmeesMAnnammaLM, et al. Exploring Arab researchers’ research data sharing and requesting practices: a survey study. Online Inf Rev2025; 48(3): 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2023-0283
AlanaziAH.Achieving global recognition: higher education rankings and the commitment to quality in Saudi Arabia’s 2030 Strategic Vision. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, https://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/84488 (2024, accessed 23 April 2025).
49.
KabaASaidKE. Determinants of the use of digital library services in higher education. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2021Mar;53(1):153-165.
HysmithHFoadianEPadhySP, et al. The future of self-driving laboratories: from human in the loop interactive AI to gamification. Digit Discov2024; 3(4): 621–636.
The Rutgers Policy Lab (2022). Rutgers Policy Lab. The State of Data Governance: A Review of Policy and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University; 2022.
54.
Dall-OrsolettaARomeroFFerreiraP.Open and collaborative innovation for the energy transition: an exploratory study. Technol Soc2022; 69: 101955.
55.
UNESCO Open Science Outlook2023. Paris: UNESCO; 2023.
56.
PersicA.UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Paris: UNESCO; 2023.
57.
AladeTOpeleJBalogunB.A desk review of the impact of open access and open data on research productivity of lecturers in developing countries. J Educ Dev Areas. 2023;31(5):187-200.
58.
OpenAIRE Policy Brief: Data Management Plans. Athens: OpenAIRE; 2022.
59.
MDPI Open Science editorial (2023). MDPI. Open Science and the Future of Publishing. Basel: MDPI; 2023.
60.
LeeD.Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers: a literature review. Scientometrics2024; 129(1): 181–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04868-2
61.
HamedAFSalmanASYassenM, et al. Human capital development in knowledge economies. J Ecohumanism2024; 3(5): 798–816.
European Commission. Turning FAIR into reality: Final report and action plan from the European Commission expert group on FAIR data. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2018.
65.
LněničkaMMachovaRVolejníkováJ, et al. Enhancing transparency through open government data: the case of data portals and their features and capabilities. Online Inf Rev2021; 45(6): 1021–1038.
66.
MartoranaMKuhnTSiebesR, et al. Aligning restricted access data with FAIR: a systematic review. PeerJ Comput Sci2022; 8: e1038.
67.
BeckSBergenholtzCBogersM, et al. The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Ind Innov2022; 29(2): 136–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
AlsukhayriAMAslamMAKhanIH, et al. Toward building a linked open data cloud to predict and regulate social relations in the Saudi society. IEEE Access2022; 10: 50548–50561.
71.
TangBRocciKSLehmannA, et al. Nitrogen increases soil organic carbon accrual and alters its functionality. Global Chang Biol2023; 29(7): 1971–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16588
72.
Abdullah SaniMKJShariSSahidNZ, et al. ASEAN Library and Information Science (LIS) research (2018–2022): a bibliometric analysis with strategies for enhanced global impact. Scientometrics2024; 129(1): 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04878-0
73.
CohoonJHowisonJ.Norms and open systems in open science. Inf Cult2021; 56(2): 115–137.
74.
SinghAKBhargawaASiinghD, et al. Physics of space weather phenomena: a review. Geosciences2021; 11(7): 286.
75.
JatiPHPLinYNodehiS, et al. FAIR versus open data: a comparison of objectives and principles. Data Intell2022; 4(4): 867–881.
76.
HardwickeTEThibaultRTClarkeB, et al. Prevalence of transparent research practices in psychology: a cross-sectional study of empirical articles published in 2022. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci2024; 7(4): 25152459241283477. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241283477
77.
GomesDGEPottierPCrystal-OrnelasR, et al. Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proc R Soc B2022; 289(1987): 20221113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1113
78.
BoryczJOlendorfRSpechtA, et al. Perceived benefits of open data are improving but scientists still lack resources, skills, and rewards. Humanit Soc Sci Commun2023; 10(1): 1–12.
79.
MerinoIMembriveALargoM, et al. School projects with the community: educational practices that promote connection between learning contexts and experiences. Acta Psychol2025; 255: 104893.
