Using complementary theories derived from the foreign-entry mode and alliance literatures and two databases on Japanese/US alliances and investments, this study examines the prevalence — a combination of formation and termination — of the full range of investment and cross-border linkage alternatives available to firms. We find that some combinations among the administrative forms, the knowledge flow intent between the partners, and industry-related technology and risk factors were more prevalent than others. Specifically, there were three prevalent combinations consistent with the notions of production efficiency, transaction cost efficiency and learning/adaptation: (1) wholly owned subsidiaries in low R&D-intense industries with the intent of unidirectional knowledge flow; (2) joint ventures in medium R&D-intense industries with reciprocal knowledge flows; and (3) technical agreements with reciprocal knowledge flows in high-tech industries.
Amburgey, Terry L. , and Hayagreeva Rao1996`Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions'. Academy of Management Journal39/5: 1265-1286.
2.
Auster, Ellen R.1992`The relationship of industry evolution to patterns of technological linkages, joint ventures, and direct investment between U.S. and Japan' . Management Science38/6: 778-792.
3.
Baughn, Chris C. , John H. Stevens, Johannes G. Denekamp, and Richard N. Osborn1997`Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances'. Journal of World Business32/2: 103-117.
4.
Baum, Joel A. C. , and Christine Oliver1996`Toward an institutional ecology of organizational founding'. Academy of Management Journal39/5: 1378-1427.
5.
Business Week. R&D scoreboard. Various issues.
6.
Chang, S.J.1995`International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry' . Academy of Management Journal38: 383-407.
7.
DiMaggio, P. J. , and W. W. Powell1983`The iron cage revisited — institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields'. American Sociological Review48/2: 147-160.
8.
Directory of Offices and Affiliates of Japanese Companies in the U.S. and Canada, Tokyo: Press Aid Center Co. Various years.
9.
Dunning, John H.1993Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Folta, Timothy B.1998`Governance and uncertainty: the trade-off between administrative control and commitment' . Strategic Management Journal19/11: 1007-1028.
11.
Freeman, J. , and M.T. Hannan1989`Setting the record straight on organizational ecology'. American Journal of Sociology95/2: 425-435.
12.
Hagedoorn, John1993`Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: International modes of cooperation and sectoral differences' . Strategic Management Journal14: 371-385.
13.
Hagedoorn, John , Albert N. Link, and Nicholas S. Vonortas2000`Research partnerships'. Research Policy29/4-5: 567-586.
14.
Hennart, Jean-Francois1991`The transactions cost theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the USA' . Management Science37: 483-497.
15.
Hennart, Jean-Francois , and Y. R. Park1993`Greenfield vs. acquisition: the strategy of Japanese investors in the United States'. Management Science39/9: 1054-1070.
16.
Hennart, Jean-Francois , and Sabine B. Reddy1997`The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: the case of Japanese investors in the United States'. Strategic Management Journal18/1: 1-12.
17.
Hennart, Jean-Francois , Dong-Jae Kim, and Ming Zeng1998`The impact of joint venture status on the longevity of Japanese stakes in U.S. manufacturing affiliates'. Organization Science9/3: 382-395.
18.
Hill, Charles W. L. , Peter Hwang, and W. Chan Kim1990`An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode'. Strategic Management Journal11/2: 117-128.
19.
Knoke, David , and Peter J. Burke1980Log-linear models. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Osborn, Richard N. , and Chris C. Baughn1990`Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances'. Academy of Management Journal33/3: 503-519.
22.
Osborn, Richard N. , Chris C. Baughn, and Johannes G. Denekamp In press `The prevalence of technology-intensive international alliances'. Asian Journal of Management.
23.
Osbom, Richard. N. , and John Hagedoorn1997`The institutionalization and revolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks'. Academy of Management Journal40/4: 261-278.
24.
Osborn, Richard N. , John Hagedoorn, Geert Duysters, Johannes G. Denekamp, and Chris C. Baughn1998`Embedded patterns of international alliance formation'. Organization Studies19/4: 617-638.
25.
Park, Sun Ho , and Gerardo Ungson1997`Re-examining nation culture, organization complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution'. Academy of Management Journal40/2: 279-307.
26.
Porter, Michael E.1990`The competitive advantage of nations' . Harvard Business Review (March-April): 73-93.
27.
Stinchcombe, Arthur L.1965`Social structure and organizations' in Handbook of organizations. J.G. March (ed.), 153-193. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
28.
Thorelli, Hans1986`Networks: between markets and hierarchies' . Strategic Management Journal7: 37-51.
29.
U.S. Industrial Outlook. Washington, D.C.: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration. Various years.
30.
Van de Ven, A. H. , and M. Poole1989`Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change' in Research on the management of innovation. A. Van de Ven, H. Angle, and M. Poole (eds.), 127-148. Cambridge: Ballinger.
31.
Vernon, Raymond1979`The product cycle in a new international environment' . Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics41: 255-267.
32.
Wells, Louis T.1972The product life cycle and international trade. Boston: Harvard University, School of Business Administration.
33.
Williamson, Oliver1991`Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives' . Administrative Science Quarterly36: 269-296.
