This article revisits a central question in the debates on the management of multinationals: the balance between centralized policy-making and subsidiary autonomy. It does so through data from a series of case studies on the management of human resources in American multinationals in the UK. Two strands of debate are confronted. The first is the literature on differences between multinationals of different national origins which has shown that US companies tend to be more centralized, standardized, and formalized in their management of human resources. It is argued that the literature has provided unconvincing explanations of this pattern, failing to link it to distinctive features of the American business system in which US multinationals are embedded. The second strand is the wider debate on the balance between centralization and decentralization in multinationals. It is argued that the literature neglects important features of this balance: the contingent oscillation between centralized and decentralized modes of operation and (relatedly) the way in which the balance is negotiated by organizational actors through micro-political processes whereby the external structural constraints on the company are defined and interpreted. In such negotiation, actors’ leverage often derives from exploiting differences between the national business systems in which the multinational operates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, Nancy, and F. Ghadar 1990 ‘Strategic human resource management: A global perspective’ in Human resource management: an international comparison. R. Pieper (ed.), 235–260. Berlin: De Gruyter .
2.
Appelbaum, Eileen, and Rose Batt 1994 The new American workplace. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press .
3.
Bartlett, Christopher, and Sumantra Ghoshal 1998 Managing across borders, 2nd edn. [1989] London: Hutchinson .
4.
Bird, A., S. Taylor and S. Beechler 1998 ‘ A typology of international human resource management in Japanese multinational corporations: Organizational implications ’. Human Resource Management37/2: 159–172 .
5.
Birkinshaw, Julian, and N. Fry 1998 ‘ Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets ’. Sloan Management Review, spring, 39/3: 51–62 .
6.
Bomers, Geert, and R. Peterson 1977 ‘ Multinational corporations and industrial relations: The case of West Germany and the Netherlands ’. British Journal of Industrial Relations15/1: 45–62 .
7.
Brooke, Michael Z. 1984 Centralization and autonomy. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston .
8.
Brooke, Michael Z., and L. Remmers 1970 The strategy of multinational enterprise. London: Longman .
9.
Chandler, Alfred 1990 Scale and scope. The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge,MA: Belknap Press .
10.
Child, John, David Faulkner, and Robert Pitkethly 2000 ‘ Foreign direct investment in the UK 1985–1994: The impact on domestic management practice ’. Journal of Management Studies37/1: 141–166 .
11.
Colling, Trevor, and Ian Clark 2002 ‘ Looking for “Americaness”: Home-country, sector and firm effects on employment systems in an engineering services company ’. European Journal of Industrial Relations8/3: 301–324 .
12.
Dowling, Peter, Denice Welch, and Randall Schuler 1999 International human resource management, 3rd edn. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College .
13.
Doz, Yves, and C. Prahalad 1994 ‘Controlled variety: A challenge for human resource management in the MNC’ in Globalizing management. V. Pucik, N. Tichy and C. Barnett (eds), 119–135. New York: Wiley .
14.
Dunning, John 1998 American investment in British [1958] manufacturing industry, revised and updated edn. London and New York: Routledge .
15.
Edwards, Paul, Anthony Ferner, and Keith Sisson 1993 ‘People and the process of management in the multinational company: A review and some illustrations’. Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 43. Coventry: IRRU .
16.
Edwards, Richard 1979 Contested terrain. The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. London: Heinemann .
17.
Ferner, Anthony 2000a ‘The embeddedness of US multinational companies in the US business system: Implications for HR/IR’. Occasional Paper No. 61. Leicester: De Montfort University School of Business .
18.
Ferner, Anthony 2000b ‘ The underpinnings of “bureaucratic” control systems: HRM in European multinationals ’. Journal of Management Studies37/4: 521–540 .
19.
Forsgren, Mats 1990 ‘ Managing the international multicentre firm ’. European Management Journal8/2: 261–267 .
20.
Ghoshal, Sumantra, and Nitin Nohria 1989 ‘ Internal differentiation within multinational corporations ’. Strategic Management Journal10: 323–337 .
21.
Ghoshal, Sumantra, and Nitin Nohria 1993 ‘ Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations ’. Sloan Management Review34/2: 23–36 .
22.
Guest, David, and Kim Hoque 1996 ‘ National ownership and HR practices in UK greenfield sites ’. Human Resource Management Journal6/4: 50–74 .
23.
Gunnigle, Patrick 1995 ‘ Collectivism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites ’. Human Resource Management Journal5/3: 24–40 .
24.
Hamill, Jim 1984 ‘ Labour relations decision making in multinational corporations ’. Industrial Relations Journal15/2: 30–34 .
25.
Harzing, Anne-Wil 1999 Managing the multinationals: An international study of control mechanisms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
26.
Hedlund, Gunnar 1986 ‘ The hypermodern MNE ’. Human Resource Management25: 9–36 .
Hollingsworth, John Rogers 1997 ‘Continuities and changes in social systems of production: The cases of Japan, Germany, and the United States’ in Contemporary capitalism. The embeddedness of institutions. J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds), 265–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Jacoby, Sanford 1997 Modern manors. Welfare capitalism since the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
30.
Kochan, Thomas, Harry Katz, and Robert McKersie 1986 The transformation of American industrial relations. Ithaca: ILR/Cornell University Press .
31.
Kopp, Rochelle 1994 ‘ International human resource policies and practices in Japanese, European, and United States multinationals ’. Human Resource Management33/4: 581–599 .
32.
Kujawa, Duane 1979 ‘ The labour relations of United States multinationals abroad: comparative and prospective views ’. Labour and Society4/1: 1–25 .
33.
Lindholm, N., M. Tahvanainen, and I. Björkman 1999 ‘Performance appraisal of host country employees: Western MNEs in China’ in International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. C. Brewster and H. Harris (eds), 143–159. London: Routledge .
34.
Marginson, Paul 2000 ‘ The Eurocompany and Euro industrial relations ’. European Journal of Industrial Relations6/1: 9–34 .
35.
Marginson, Paul, and Keith Sisson 1994 ‘The structure of transnational capital in Europe: The emerging Euro-company and its implications for industrial relations’ in New frontiers in European industrial relations. R. Hyman and A. Ferner (eds), 15–51. Oxford: Blackwell .
36.
Martin, Graham, and Phil Beaumont 1999 ‘ Co-ordination and control of human resource management in multinational firms: The case of CASHCO ’. International Journal of Human Resource Management10/1: 21–42 .
37.
Martínez, J., and J-C. Jarillo 1989 ‘ The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations ’. Journal of International Business Studies, fall: 489–514 .
38.
Mtar, Monia 2001 ‘French multinationals’ international strategy: National identity under the effect of globalisation’. PhD thesis. Coventry: University of Warwick.
39.
Negandhi, Anand 1983 ‘External and internal functioning of American, German, and Japanese multinational corporations: Decisionmaking and policy issues’ in Multinational corporations. M. Casson (ed.), 557–577. Aldershot: Edward Elgar .
40.
Negandhi, Anand 1986 ‘Role and structure of German multinationals: A comparative profile’ in European approaches to international management. K. Macharzina and W. Staehle (eds), 51–66. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter .
41.
Ngo, H., D. Turban, C. Lau, and S. Lui 1998 ‘ Human resource practices and firm performance of multinational corporations: Influences of country origin ’. International Journal of Human Resource Management9/4: 632–652 .
42.
O’Sullivan, Mary 2000 Contests for corporate control. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
43.
Perlmutter, Harry 1969 ‘ The tortuous evolution of the multinational firm ’. Columbia Journal of World Business, January–February: 9–18 .
44.
Quintanilla, Javier 1998 ‘The configuration of HRM policies in multinational subsidiaries: The case of European retail banks in Spain’. PhD thesis. Coventry: University of Warwick.
45.
Roberts, Brian 1972 ‘Factors influencing the organization and style of management and their effect on the pattern of industrial relations in multi-national corporations’ in Transnational industrial relations. H. Günter (ed.), 109–132. London: Macmillan .
46.
Rosenzweig, Philip, and Nitin Nohria 1994 ‘ Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations ’. Journal of International Business Studies25/2: 229–251 .
47.
Royle, Tony, editor 2000 Working for McDonald’s in Europe. London: Routledge .
48.
Tayeb, Monir 1998 ‘ Transfer of HRM policies and practices across cultures: An American company in Scotland ’. International Journal of Human Resource Management9/2: 332–358 .
49.
Tayeb, Monir, and Kathryn Thory 2001 ‘ Americans in Europe: The case of 10 US MNCs and their HRM in Scotland ’. Paper presented to the ESRC Conference on Multinational Enterprises: Embedded Organizations, Transnational Federations or Global Learning Communities?, 6–8 September, University of Warwick, Coventry.
50.
Taylor, S., S. Beechler, and N. Napier 1996 ‘ Toward an integrative model of strategic international human resource management ’. Academy of Management Review21/4: 959–985 .
51.
Vitols, Sigurt 2001 ‘Varieties of corporate governance: Comparing Germany and the UK’ in Varieties of capitalism The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. P. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), 337–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
52.
Wever, Kirsten 1995 ‘ Human resource management and organizational strategies in Germanand US-owned companies ’. International Journal of Human Resource Management6/3: 606–625 .
53.
Young, S., N. Hood, and J. Hamill 1985 Decision-making in foreign-owned multinational subsidiaries in the United Kingdom. ILO Working Paper No. 35. Geneva: ILO .
54.
Yuen, E., and Hui Tak Kee 1993 ‘ Headquarters, host-culture and organizational influences on HRM policies and practices ’. Management International Review33/4: 361–383 .
