Reshaping the Hourglass? The Environmental Movement and Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation

Abstract

Rose's and Mishler and Rose's ‘hourglass’ construction of post-Soviet Russian society illustrates that the civil space traditionally occupied by advocacy and community groups continues to be constricted. Such groups fail to successfully bridge the space between the individual and the state, thereby holding the fledgling Russian democracy to account. In this paper, to shed light on reasons for the continuing constriction of Russian civil space, the behavior of the environmental movement in one Russian region — Samara Oblast — is observed through the lens of social capital. By utilizing Adler and Kwon's schema for assessing the benefits and risks arising from social capital stocks possessed by collectives, it will illustrate that the Russian environmental movement is inward looking and parochial; built on pre-existing friendships or elite connections; and uninterested in forming a mass movement or actively engaging with the Russian public. Moreover, rather than being situated within the constricted civil space of Russian society, the majority of groups within the Samara environmental movement are themselves situated firmly in either half of the hourglass. Groups within each half successfully span gaps between each other, but no activity is undertaken to bridge or reshape the constricted space between the halves.

Keywords

Russia environmental movement social capital civil society

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler, Paul. S. , and Seok-Woo Kwon 2002 ‘Social capital: Prospects for a new concept’ . Academy of Management Review 27/1: 17–40 .

Baglione, Lisa A. , and Carol L. Clark 1998 ‘The challenge of transforming Russian unions: The mining and metallurgy trade union’ . Problems in Post-Communism 45/1: 43–53 .

Bernard, Michael. 1996 ‘Civil society after the first transition: Dilemmas of post-Communist democratization in Poland and beyond’ . Communist and Post-Communist Studies 29/3: 309–330 .

Burt, Ronald S. 1992 Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Cellarus, Barbara A. , and Caedmon Staddon 2002 ‘Environmental nongovernmental organizations, civil society and democratization in Bulgaria’ . East European Politics and Societies 16/1: 182–222 .

Coleman, James 1988 ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’ . American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120 .

Crotty, Jo 2003a ‘Managing civil society: Democratization and the environmental movement in a Russian region’ . Communist and Post Communist Studies 36/4: 489–508 .

Crotty, Jo 2003b ‘The re-organization of Russia's regional bureaucracy: Regional response to federal changes’ . Eurasian Geography and Economics 44/6: 462–475 .

Crotty, Jo and Andrew Crane 2004 ‘Transitions in environmental risk: Management capability and community trust in Russia’ . Journal of Risk Research 7/4: 413–429 .

10.

Domrin, Alexander N. 2003 ‘Ten years later: Society, civil society and the Russian state’ . The Russian Review 62: 205–206 .

11.

Eisenhardt, Kathleen 1989 ‘Building theories from case study research’ . Academy of Management Review 14/4: 532–550 .

12.

Golenkova, Zinaida T. 1999 ‘Civil society in Russia’ . Russian Social Science Review 40/1: 56–79 .

13.

Hale, Henry E. 2002 ‘Civil society from above? Statist and liberal models of state-building in Russia’ . Demokratizatsiya 10/3: 313–317 .

14.

Hanson, Philip 1997 ‘Samara: A preliminary profile of a Russian region and its adaptation to market’ . Europe-Asia Studies 49/3: 407–430 .

15.

Howard, Michael M. 2002 ‘Postcommunist civil society in comparative perspective’ . Demokratizatsiya 10/3: 202–223 .

16.

Klose, Lena 2000 ‘Let's Help the River: Volga NGO builds links with local government’ . Give and Take: A Journal on Civil Society in Eurasia, Fall 2000, www.isar.org.

17.

Knoke, David 1999 ‘Organizational Networks and Corporate Social Capital’ in Corporate social capital and liability. R. Th. A. J. Leanders and S. M. Gabbay (eds). Boston, MA: Kluwer .

18.

Lin, Nathan 2001 ‘Social capital: A theory of social structure and action’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

19.

Linz, Susan J. , and Gary Krueger 1996 ‘Russian managers in transition: Pilferers or paladins?’ . Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 37/7: 397–426 .

20.

Marsh, Christopher 2000 ‘Social capital and democracy in Russia’ . Communist and Post-Communist Studies 33: 183–199 .

21.

Mishler, William , and Richard Rose 1997 ‘Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-Communist societies’ . Journal of Politics 59/2: 418–451 .

22.

Nahapiet, Janine , and Sumantra Ghoshal 1998 ‘Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage’ . Academy of Management Review 23/2: 242–266 .

23.

Neace, M. B. 1999 ‘Entrepreneurs in emerging economies: Creating trust, social capital and civil society’ . Annals, AAPSS 565: 148–161 .

24.

Perepjolkin, Lev , and Yuri Figatner 1997 ‘Environmental movements in Moscow’ in Environmental and housing movements: Grassroots experience. K. Lang-Pickvance , N. Manning , and C. G. Pickvance (eds). Aldershot: Avebury .

25.

Portes, Alejandro 1998 ‘Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology’ . Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24 .

26.

Putnam, Richard 1993 Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

27.

Putnam, Richard 1995 ‘Bowling alone: America's declining social capital’ . Journal of Democracy 6/1: 65–78 .

28.

Rau, Zbigniew 1991 The re-emergence of civil society in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Boulder, CO: Westview .

29.

Richter, James 2002 ‘Promoting civil society: Democracy assistance and Russian women's organizations’ . Problems of Post-Communism 49/1: 30–41 .

30.

Rose, Richard 1995 ‘Russia as an hourglass society: A constitution without citizens’ . East European Constitutional Review 4/3: 34–42 .

31.

Rose, Richard 2000 ‘Uses of social capital in Russia: Modern, pre-modern and antimodern’ . Post-Soviet Affairs 16/1: 33–57 .

32.

Schroeder, Gertrude 1998 ‘Dimensions of Russia's industrial transformation 1992 to 1998: An overview’ . Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 39/5: 243–270 .

33.

Smolar, Andrei 1996 ‘Civil society after Communism: From opposition to atomization’ . Journal of Democracy 7/1: 24–38 .

34.

Tysiachniouk, Maria , and Alla Bolotova 1999 ‘Environmental activism in the St. Petersburg region’ in Towards a sustainable future: Environmental activism in Russia and the United States. M. S. Tysiachniouk and G. W. McCarthy (eds). St. Petersburg: Institute of Chemistry Publishing, St. Petersburg State University .

35.

Weiner, Douglas 1999 A little corner of freedom: Russian nature protection from Stalin to Gorbachev. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press .

36.

Wolch, Jennifer 1989 ‘The shadow sector: Transformations in the voluntary sector’ in The power of geography: How territory shapes social life. Jennifer Wolch and Michael Dear (eds). Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman .

37.

Yanitsky, Oleg N. 1996 ‘The ecological movement in post-totalitarian Russia: Some conceptual issues’ . Society and Natural Resources 9: 65–76 .