This article presents a case study of decision making in a British chemical organization. The initial problem is one of whether the generation of electricity is a feasible prop osition in addition to the production of chemicals. This issue acts as a platform for protracted political debate as soon as questions of career succession and career interests are aroused. The focus shifts from economic criteria to those of career aspirations. The decision spans four years, from 1964 to 1968, and data for the case study were collected over a three-year period, from 1976 to 1979. Existing notions of decision making are examined for their adequacy in explaining the events that took place and modifications to these concepts are explored in the analysis of the case study. It is found that hoth the effects of the organization and the specific individuals within it, combine simultaneously to produce the events of this decision. The article begins with a short introduction of existing decision making theories, follows with an account of the case study, and concludes with an analysis of its decisional characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
Allison, G.T.1969 'Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis'. American Political Science Review, September.
3.
Astley, W.G., R. Axelsson, R.J. Butler, D.J. Hickson. and D.C. Wilson1981'Decision making: theory III'. Working paper, Organizational Analysis Research Unit, Bradford.
4.
Axelrod, R.1970Conflict of interests: a theory of divergent goals with applications to politicsChicago: Markham.
5.
Bachrach. P., and M.S. Baratz1970Power and poverty. theory and practiceOxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Baumol, W.J.1959Business behaviour, value and growthNew York: Macmillan.
7.
Braybrooke, D., and C.E. Lindblom1963A strategy of decision. New York: Free Press.
8.
Butler, R.J., D. Cray, D.J.Hickson. G.R. Mallory, and D.C. Wilson1981'Complexity and cleavage in decision making: an empirical investigation'. Working paper. Organizational Analysis Research Unit, Bradford.
9.
Campbell, D.T., and J.C. Stanley1966Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for researchChicago: Rand McNally.
10.
Clegg. S.1979The theory of power and organizationLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul
11.
Cohen, D.M., J.G. March, and J.P. Olsen1972 'A garbage can model of organizational choice'. Administrative Science Quarterly17/1:1-25.
12.
Collins. O., and D.G. Moore1970The organization makers. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13.
Crozier, M.1973'The problems of power' Social Research41/2:211-228.
14.
Cyert, R., and J.G. March1963A behavtoral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall
15.
Dalton, M.1958Men who manage. New YorkWiley.
16.
De Waele, J.-P. and R. Harré1976'The personality of individuals' in Personality. R. Harré (ed) London: Basil Blackwell
17.
Dunn. W.N., and F.W. Swerczck1977'Planned organizational change towards a grounded theory' . Journal of Applied Behavioural Science13/2: 135-157.
18.
Ellul. J.1964The technological society. New York : Knopf.
19.
Giddens, A.1976New rules of sociological methodLondon : Hutchinson.
20.
Hage, J.1980Theories of organizations form, process and transformation . New York: Wiley.
21.
Hickson. D.J., C.R. Hinings, C.A. LeeR.E. Schneck, and J.M. Pennings1971'A strategic contingencies theory of intra-organizational power'Administrative Science Quarterly16/2:216-229.
22.
Jamous, H., and B. Peloille1970'Professions or self-perpetuating systems? Changes in the French umversity-hospital system' in Professions and professionalization. J. A. Jackson (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge Umversity Press.
23.
Leavitt. H. J. 1972Managerial psychology (3rd edition) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Lindblom. C. E. 1959 'The science of "muddling through"'. Public Administration Review19:79-88.
25.
Luce. D.R., and H. Raiffa1957Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
26.
March. J.G., and H.A. Simon1958Organizations. New York: Wiley.
27.
March. J.G., and J.P. Olsen1976Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Oslo: Universitet Sforlaget.
28.
McClintock, C.C., D. Brannon. and S. Maynard-Moody1979'Applying the logic of sample surveys to qualitative case studies: the case cluster method'. Administrative Science Quarterly24/4:612-629.
29.
Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani, and A. Theoret1976 'The structure of "unstructured" decision processes'. Administrative Science Quarterly21/2:246-275.
30.
Mintzberg, H.1978'Patterns in strategy formation'. Management Science24/9:934-948.
31.
Moore, P.G., and H. Thomas1976The anatomy of decistons. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
Pettigrew, A.1973The politics of organizational decision makingLondon: Tavistock.
34.
Pugh, D.S., D.J. Hickson, C.R. Hinings, and C. Turner1968'Dimensions of organization structure'. Administrative Science Quarterly13/1:65-105.
35.
Pugh, D.C., D.J. Hickson.C.R. Hinings. and C. Turner1969 'The context of organization structures'. Administrative Science Quarterly14:91-114.
36.
Secord. P.F., and C. Backman1961 'Personality theory and the problem of stability and change in individual behaviour: an interpersonal approach'. Psychological Review68:21-32.
