We explore the capacity of positive sentiments, those enduring affective states one achieves when one likes another, to impact status structures. Do positive sentiments combine with existing aspects of interaction to create status hierarchies and potentially change the social order, or do they moderate the effects of extant structure by dampening the magnitude of status differences? Using the theoretical framework of Status Characteristics Theory (SCT) and the Camilleri-Berger model of decision-making, we designed an experiment to adjudicate between these two potentialities. Participation in the study consisted of 168 students. Results found support for the notion that positive sentiments moderate the effects of structural factors on indicators of social status; interestingly, this moderation effect varies by gender. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings, and new directions for research concerning sentiment and status processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalkwellJames W.2001. “The Camilleri-Berger Model Revisited.”Advances in Group Process18: 217–232.
2.
BalkwellJames W.BergerJoseph. 1996. “Gender, Status, and Behavior in Task Situations.”Social Psychology Quarterly59: 3: 273–283.
3.
BergerJosephCohenBernard P.ZelditchMorrisJr. 1966. “Status Characteristics and Expectation States.” Pp. 26–49 in Sociological Theories in Progress, vol.1, edited byBergerJosephZelditchMorrisJrAndersonBo. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
BergerJosephCohenBernard P.ZelditchMorrisJr1972. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.”American Sociological Review37: 241–255.
5.
BergerJosephHamit FişekM.NormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach.New York: Elsevier Press.
6.
BergerJosephRidgewayCecilia L.Hamit FişekM.NormanRobert Z.. 1998. “The Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power and Prestige Orders.”American Sociological Review63: 3: 379–405.
7.
BianchiAlison J.2005. “Rejecting Others’ Influence: Negative Sentiment and Status in Task Groups.”Sociological Perspectives47: 4: 339–355.
8.
BienenstockElisa J.BianchiAlison J.. 2004. “Activating Performance Expectations and Status Differences Through Gift Exchange: Experimental Results.”Social Psychology Quarterly67: 3: 310–318.
9.
CamilleriSanto F.BergerJoseph. 1967. “Decision-Making and Social Influence: A Model and an Experimental Test.”Sociometry30: 367–378.
10.
CorrellShelleyRidgewayCecilia L.. 2003. “Expectation States Theory.” Pp. 29–51 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited byDelamaterJohnNew York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
11.
DriskellJames E.1982. “Personal Characteristics and Performance Expectations.”Social Psychology Quarterly45: 229–237.
12.
DriskellJames E.WebsterMurrayJr. 1997. “Status and Sentiment in Task Groups.” Pp. 179–200 in Status, Network, and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes, edited bySzmatkaJacekSkvoretzJohnBergerJosephStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
FişekM. HamitBergerJoseph. 1998. “Sentiment and Task Performance Expectations.”Advances in Group Processes15: 23–39.
15.
FişekM. HamitBergerJosephNormanRobert Z.. 1991. “Participation in Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Groups: A Theoretical Integration.”American Journal of Sociology97: 1: 114–142.
16.
FişekM. HamitBergerJosephNormanRobert Z.1995. “Evaluations and the Formation of Expectations.”American Journal of Sociology101: 3: 721–746.
17.
FişekM. HamitBergerJosephNormanRobert Z.2005. “Status Cues and the Formation of Expectations.”Social Science Research34: 80–102.
18.
FişekM. HamitNormanRobert Z.Nelson-KilgerMax. 1992. “Status Characteristics and Expectation States Theory: A Priori Model Parameters and Test.”Journal of Mathematical Sociology16: 4: 285–303.
19.
FoschiMarthaSigersonKirstenLaiLarissaFoschiRicardo. 1990. “A Computerized Setting for Expectation States Research.”Presented at the Annual Meeting of the West Coast Group ProcessesPortland, OR.
20.
GordonSteven L.1981. “The Sociology of Sentiments and Emotion.” Pp. 562–592 in Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, edited byRosenbergMorrisTurnerRalph H.New York: Basic Books.
21.
HomansGeorge C.1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
22.
HeissJerold S.1962. “Degree of Intimacy and Male-Female Interaction.”Sociometry25: 197–208.
23.
HurwitzJacob I.ZanderAlvin F.HymovitchBernard. 1960. “Some Effects of Power on Relations among Group Members.” Pp. 800–809 in Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, Second Edition, edited byCartwrightDorwinZanderAlvin. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Company.
24.
JohnsonCathryn. 1993. “Gender and Formal Authority.”Social Psychology Quarterly6: 3: 193–210.
LawlerEdwardRidgewayCecilia L.MarkovskyBarry. 1993. “Structural Social Psychology and the Micro-Macro Problem.”Sociological Theory11: 3: 268–290.
27.
LeikRobert K.1963. “Instrumentality and Emotionality in Family Interaction.”Sociometry26: 131–145.
28.
LovagliaMichael J.HouserJeffrey A.. 1996. “Emotional Reactions and Status in Groups.”American Sociological Review61: 5: 867–883.
29.
MeekerBarbaraWeitzel-O'NeillPatricia. 1977. “Sex Roles and Interpersonal Behavior in Task-Oriented Groups.”American Sociological Review42: 91–105.
30.
MooreBert S.IsenAlice. 1990. “Affect and Social Behavior.” Pp. 1–21 in Affect and Social Behavior.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MooreJames C.Jr. 1965. “Development of the Spatial Judgement Experimental Task.”Technical Report No. 15. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Laboratory for Social Research.
32.
MooreJames C.Jr. 1968. “Status and Influence in Small Group Interactions.”Sociometry31: 47–63.
33.
RidgewayCecilia L.1978. “Conformity, Group-Oriented Motivation, and Status Attainment in Small Groups.”Social Psychology Quarterly41: 3: 175–188.
34.
RidgewayCecilia L.1982. “Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.”American Sociological Review47: 1: 76–88.
35.
RidgewayCecilia L.1988. “Gender Differences in Task Groups: A Status and Legitimacy Account.” Pp. 188–206 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited byWebsterMurrayJrFoschiMartha. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
RidgewayCecilia L.1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.”Social Forces70: 2: 367–386.
37.
RidgewayCecilia L.1994. “Affect.” Pp. 205–230 in Group Processes: Sociological Analyses, edited byFoschiMarthaLawlerEdward J.Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
38.
RidgewayCecilia L.BalkwellJames W.. 1997. “Group Processes and the Diffusion of Status Beliefs.”Social Psychology Quarterly60: 1: 14–31.
39.
RidgewayCecilia L.DiekemaDavid. 1992. “Are Gender Differences Status Differences?” Pp. 157–180 in Gender, Interaction and Inequality, edited byRidgewayCecilia. New York: Springer-Verlag.
40.
RidgewayCecilia L.JohnsonCathryn. 1990. “What is the Relationship between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups?”American Journal of Sociology95: 5: 1189–1212.
41.
RidgewayCecilia L.WalkerHenry A.. 1995. “Status Structures.” Pp. 281–310 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited byCookKaren S.FineGary A.HouseJames S.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
42.
ShackelfordSusanWoodWendyWorchelStephen. 1996. “Behavioral Styles and the Influence of Women in Mixed-Sex Groups.”Social Psychology Quarterly59: 3: 284–293.
43.
ShellyRobert K.1993. “How Sentiments Organize Interaction.”Advances in Group Processes10: 113–132.
SkvoretzJohnFararoThomas J.. 1996. “Status and Participation in Task Groups: A Dynamic Network Model.”American Journal of Sociology101: 5: 1366–1414.
46.
Smith-LovinLynn. 1995. “The Sociology of Affect and Emotion.” Pp. 118–148 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited byCookKaren S.FineGary A.HouseJames S.. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
47.
SuttlesGerald D.1970. “Friendship as a Social Institution.” Pp. 95–135 in Social Relationships, edited byMcCallGeorge J.McCallMichael M.DenzinNorman K.SuttlesGerald D.KurthSuzanne B.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
48.
TroyerLisa. 1996. “An Adaptation of the Computerized Standardized Experimental Setting.”Technical Paper. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Center for the Study of Group Processes.
49.
WagnerDavid G.BergerJoseph. 2002. “Expectation States Theory: An Evolving Research Program.” Pp. 41–76 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited byBergerJosephZelditchMorrisJrLanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
50.
WebsterMurrayJr.FoschiMartha. 1988. “Overview of Status Generalization.” Pp. 1–20 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited byWebsterMurrayJrFoschiMarthaStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
WebsterMurrayJrHysomStuart J.. 1998. “Creating Status Characteristics.”American Sociological Review63: 3: 351–378. Alison J. Bianchi is an assistant professor of sociology at Kent State University. Her research interests focus on processes of status, emotions, legitimation, and identity. Currently, she is working on projects that examine the relations between: (1) exchange and status, (2) network density and identity formation, and (3) legitimation and engagement.. Donna A. Lancianese is an MA candidate in the Department of Sociology at Kent State University. Her thesis research explores the role of legitimation in identity standard formation. She will begin attending the University of Iowa's PhD program in the fall of 2006..
