Would democratic theory in its empirical and normative guises be in a better position without the theory of the deliberative public sphere? In this paper I explore recent theories of agonistic democracy that have answered this question in the affirmative. I question their assertionthat the theory of the public sphere should be abandoned in favor of a model of democratic politics based on political contestation. Furthermore, I explore one of the fundamental assumptionsat work in the debate about the theory of the public sphere’s status, namely the assumed opposition between consensus and contestation. Questioning the rigid nature of the opposition, I go on to argue that the deliberative theory of the public sphere actually facilitates the development of the agonistic approach to democratic theory and practice.
Abendroth, Wolfgang et al. ( 1968 ) Die Linke Antwortet Habermas . Frankfurt am Main : Europäische Verlagsanstalt .
2.
Benhabib, Seyla ( 1996 ) ‘ The Democratic Moment and the Problem of Difference ’, in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political , ed. Seyla Benhabib . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
3.
Brown, Wendy ( 1995 ) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
4.
Calhoun, Craig ( 1997 ) ‘ Nationalism and the Public Sphere ’, in Publicand Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy , ed. Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar . Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
5.
Chambers, Simone ( 1996 ) Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .
6.
Cohen, Jean ( 1988 ) ‘ Discourse Ethics and Civil Society ’, Philosophy and Social Criticism . 14 : 315 – 338 .
7.
Connolly, William E. ( 1993 ) Political Theory and Modernity . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .
8.
Coole, Diana ( 1997 ) ‘ Habermas and the Question of Alterity ’, in Habermas and the Unfinished Question of Modernity: Critical Essays on The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity , ed. Maurizio Passerin d’EntrËves and Seyla Benhabib . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
9.
Dean, Jodi ( 1996a ) ‘ Civil Society: Beyond the Public Sphere ’, in The Handbook of Critical Theory , ed. David Rasmussen . Oxford : Blackwell , 1999.
10.
Dean, Jodi ( 1996b ) The Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism After Identity Politics . Berkeley : University of California Press .
11.
Geuss, Raymond ( 2001 ) History and Illusion in Politics . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
12.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1973 ) Theory and Practice , trans. John Viertel. Boston, MA : Beacon Press .
13.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1981 ) ‘ Die Utopie des guten Herrschers ’, in Kleine Politische Schriften (I–IV).Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp .
14.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1982 ) ‘ A Reply to My Critics ’, in Habermas: Critical Debates , ed. John B. Thompson and David Held . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
15.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1989 ) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society , trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
16.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1991a ) ‘ A Reply ’, in Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action , ed. Axel Honneth and Hans Joas . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
17.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1991b ) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , trans.Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
18.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1992 ) ‘ Further Reflections on the Public Sphere ’, in Habermas and the Public Sphere , ed. Craig Calhoun . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
19.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1994 ) ‘ Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State ’, in Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition , ed. Charles Taylor et al. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
20.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1996 ) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie . Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp .
21.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1998 ) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
22.
Heath, Joseph ( 2001 ) Communicative Action and Rational Choice . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
23.
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe ( 1982 ) The Institution of Criticism.Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .
24.
Holub, Robert ( 1994 ) ‘ Habermas Among the Americans: Modernity, Ethics, and the Public Sphere ’, German Politics and Society33 : 1 – 22 .
25.
James, Michael (2002) ‘ Pluralism and the Public Sphere ’. Presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association , Long Beach, CA .
26.
Johnson, James ( 1991 ) ‘ Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action ’, Political Theory19 : 181 – 201 .
27.
Lippmann, Walter ( 1993 ) The Phantom Public . New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction Publishers .
28.
Markell, Patchen ( 1997 ) ‘ Contesting Consensus: Rereading Habermas on the Public Sphere ’, Constellations3 : 377 – 400 .
29.
Mouffe, Chantal ( 1999 ) ‘ Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism ’, Social Research66 : 745 – 758 .
30.
Mouffe, Chantal ( 2000 ) The Democratic Paradox . New York : Verso .
31.
Pensky, Max , ed. ( 1994 ) The Past as Future: Jürgen Habermas interviewed by Michael Haller . Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press .
32.
Peters, Bernhard ( 1994 ) ‘ Der Sinn von ÷ffentlichkeit ’, ÷ffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft34. ed.Friedhelm Neidhardt : Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag .
33.
Rehg, William ( 1998 ) ‘ Translator’s Introduction ’, in Jürgen Habermas , Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
34.
Robbins, Bruce , ed. ( 1993 ) The Phantom Public Sphere . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
35.
Shapiro, Ian ( 1999 ) Democratic Justice . New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .
36.
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu ( 1997 ) ‘ Changing Parameters of Citizenship and Claims-Making: Organized Islam in European Public Spheres ’, Theory and Society26 ( August ): 509 – 527 .
37.
Thompson, Dennis ( 1970 ) The Democratic Citizen: Social Science and Democratic Theory in the Twentieth Century . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
38.
Villa, Dana ( 1992 ) ‘ Postmodernism and the Public Sphere ’, American Political Science Review86 ( September ): 712 – 721 .
39.
Young, Iris Marion ( 1990 ) Justice and the Politics of Difference . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
