As ardent followers of Mencius and Zhu Xi, virtually all Korean Neo-Confucians during the Chosŏn dynasty rejected the Way of the Hegemon by understanding it as directly opposed to the Kingly Way, a humane government allegedly conducted by ancient sage-kings. However, Yi I 珥 (1536–1584), a prominent Neo-Confucian scholar-official in sixteenth-century Korea, endorsed the Way of the Hegemon as compatible with the Kingly Way by reconceptualizing it, otherwise predicated on strong consequentialist ethics, in a way consistent with Confucianism’s deepest concern with the well-being of the people. In Confucianizing the Way of the Hegemon through the creative re-reading of the Book of Rites from a Xunzian standpoint, Yi I proposed a new method of moral self-cultivation specifically tailored for a Confucian ruler—called political self-cultivation in this paper—that combined the traditional Neo-Confucian recovery model of self-cultivation with a strong sense of political responsibility.
AdlerJoseph A. 2015. Reconstructing the Confucian Dao: Zhu Xi’s Appropriation of Zhou Dunyi. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
AnOe-sun. 2007. “Tonghu mundabe natanan yulgok yiiŭ ch’ogi chŏngch’isasang 동호문답에 나타난 율곡 이이의 초기 정치사상 [Yulgok Yi I’s Early Political Thought in Questions and Answers at East Lake].” Yugyo sasang yŏn’gu28: 125–154.
3.
AngleStephen C.2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
AngleStephen C.TiwaldJustin. 2017. Neo-Confucianism: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
5.
BackYoungsunIvanhoePhilip J., eds. 2017. Traditional Korean Philosophy: Problems and Debates. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
6.
BloomIrene (Trans.). 2009. Mencius. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
ChanJoseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
ChiTu-hwan. 1998. Chosŏnsidae sasangsaŭi chaejomyŏng 조선시대 사상사의 재조명 [Revisiting the History of Ideas during the Chosŏn Dynasty]. Seoul: Yŏksa munhwa.
9.
Ch’oeChin-hong. 2009. “Pŏpkkwa sotong kŭrigo chŏngch’i: Yulgogŭi p’yejŏnggyehyŏgnonŭl chungsimŭro 법과 소통 그리고 정치: 율곡의 폐정개혁론을 중심으로 [Law, Communication, and Politics: On Yulgok’s Proposal to Reform Corrupt Politics].” Tongyang kojŏn yŏn’gu36: 301–32.
10.
Ch’oeYŏn-sik. 2003. Ch’ang’ŏp’gwa susŏngŭi chŏngch’isasang 창업과 수성의 정치사상 [The Political Thought of Founding and Consolidation]. Seoul: Chimmundang.
Ch’uChe-yŏp. 2018. “Yihwanggwa yiiŭi chŏngch’igyehyŏngnon’gwa sŏnghak 이황과 이이의 정치개혁론과 성학 [Political Reform Plans and the Learning to Become a Sage in Yi Hwang’s and Yi I’s Political Thoughts].” Yulgokhak yŏn’gu37: 99–134.
13.
ChungEdward Y. J.1995. The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi T’oegye and Yi Yulgok: A Reappraisal of the “Four-Seven Thesis” and Its Practical Implications for Self-Cultivation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
ChungEdward Y. J.2021. The Moral and Religious Thought of Yi Hwang (Toegye): A Study of Korean Neo-Confucian Ethics and Spirituality. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
ChungEdward Y. J.OhJea S., eds. 2022. Emotions in Korean Philosophy and Religion: Confucian, Comparative, and Contemporary Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
El AmineLoubna. 2015. Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
HarrisEirik L.2016. “Xunzi’s Political Philosophy.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi, edited by HuttonEric L., 95–138. Dordrecht: Springer.
18.
HuangYong. 2014. Why Be Moral? Learning from the Neo-Confucian Cheng Brothers. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
HuttonEric L.2016. “Ethics in the Xunzi.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi, edited by HuttonEric L., 67–93. Dordrecht: Springer.
20.
HwangŬi-tong. 2022. Yulgok ch’ŏrak yŏn’gu 율곡철학연구 [A Study on Yulgok’s Philosophy]. Seoul: Ch’aekmirae.
21.
IvanhoePhilip J.2000. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Indianapolis: Hackett.
22.
IvanhoePhilip J.2015. “The Historical Significance and Contemporary Relevance of the Four-Seven Debate.” Philosophy East and West65, no. 2: 401–29.
23.
JonesDavidHeJinli, eds. 2015. Returning to Zhu Xi: Emerging Patterns within the Supreme Polarity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
KaltonMichael C. (Trans.). 1988. To Become a Sage. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
KaltonMichael C.KimOaksook C.ParkSung BaeRoYoung-chanWei-mingTuYamashitaSamuel. 1994. The Four-Seven Debate: An Annotated Translation of the Most Famous Controversy in Korean Neo-Confucian Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
KangChŏng-in. 2013. “Yulgok yiiŭi chŏngch’isasange natanan taedong, sogang, sogang: Sironchŏk kaenyŏm punsŏk” 율곡 이이의 정치사상에 나타난 대동, 소강, 소강 [The Grand Union and Two Different Types of Small Tranquility in Yulgok Yi I’s Political Thought].” In Nŏmnadŭmŭi chŏngch’isasang 넘나듦의 정치사상 [A Political Thought of Cross-Thinking], 233–72. Seoul: Humanitas.
27.
KimHyoungchan. 2018. Korean Confucianism: The Philosophy and Politics of Toegye and Yulgok. London: Roman and Littlefield International.
28.
KimSungmoon. 2020. Theorizing Confucian Virtue Politics: The Political Philosophy of Mencius and Xunzi. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KimSungmoon. 2021. “Between Coherence and Principle: Li 理 and the Politics of Neo-Confucianism in Late Koryŏ Korea.” Philosophy East and West71, no. 2: 369–92.
30.
KimSun-nam. 2022. Sejo, p’okkun’gwa myŏnggun sai 세조, 폭군과 명군 사이 [King Sejo, Between Being a Tyrant and Being a Good Ruler]. Seoul: Purŭn yŏksa.
31.
KimToil. 2019. “Sunjaŭ p’aedorŭl yonginhaennŭn’ga? 순자는 패도를 용인했는가? [Did Xunzi Really Approve of the Way of the Hegemon?” Chŏrak139: 1–27.
32.
LeggeJames. 1885. The Sacred Books of East, Vol. 27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
LiuJeeLoo. 2017. Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality. London: Blackwell.
34.
MakehamJohn, eds. 2018. The Buddhist Roots of Zhu Xi's Philosophical Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
NgKai-chiuHuangYong, eds. 2020. Dao Companion to Zhu Xi’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.
37.
PaePyŏng-sam. 1997. “Chosŏnsidae chŏngch’ijŏk lidŏsimnon: Sugich’iin’gwa muwiich’ronŭl chungsimŭro 조선시대 정치적 리더십론: 수기치인과 무위이치를 중심으로 [A Theory of Political Leadership during the Chosŏn Period: Focusing on the Doctrine of Governing People through Moral Self-Cultivation and the Politics of Effortless Action].” Han’guk chŏngch’ihak hoebo31, no. 4: 49–68.
38.
RoYoung-chan. 1988. Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi Yulgok. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
RoYoung-chan, ed. 2019. Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.
TillmanHoyt C. 1982. Utilitarian Confucianism: Ch’en Liang’s Challenge to Chu Hsi. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
42.
TillmanHoyt C. 1992. Confucian Discourse and Chu Hsi’s Ascendancy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
43.
ŰbelhőrMonika. 1989. “The Community Compact (Hsiang-yüeh) of the Sung and Its Educational Significance.” In Neo-Confucian Education: The Formative Stage, edited by Theodore de BaryWm.ChaffeeJohn W., 371–88. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
YiChae-sŏk. 2020. “Yulgok yiiŭi hyŏnsil insikkwa kyŏngsesasang 율곡 이이의 현실인식과 경세사상 [Yulgok Yi I’s Perception of Reality and Social and Economic Thought].” Tongyang munhwa yŏn’gu33: 7–34.
45.
YiChong-sŏng. 2016. “Yulgok taedongsahoeronŭi ch’ŏrak chiyanggua haesŏgŭi chŏhwan 율곡 대동사회론의 철학적 지향과 해석의 전환 [A Change in the Philosophical Orientation and Interpretation of Yulgok’s Theory of the Grand Union Society].” Tongsŏ ch’ŏrak yŏn’gu81: 55–81.
46.
YiSŭng-hwan. 1998. “Chujawa chillyangŭi wangp’aenonjaeng 주자와 진량의 왕패논쟁 [A King-Hegemon Debate between Zhu Xi and Chen Liang].” In Yugasasangŭi sahoech’ŏrakchŏk Chaejomyŏng 유가사상의 사회철학적 재조명 [A Social Philosophical Reflection on Confucian Thought], 286–321. Seoul: Koryŏ taehakgyo ch’ulp’anbu.
47.
YuPul-ran. 2015. “Tasŭryŏjimesŏ tasŭrimŭro: Yulgogŭi yuwiŭi chŏch’ihak” 다스려짐에서 다스림으로: 율곡의 유위의 정치학 [From Being Well-Governed to Governing Well: Yulgok’s Politics of Action.” Han’guk tongyang chŏngch’isasang yŏn’gu14, no. 2: 135–158.
48.
YuYing-shih. 2003. Zhu Xi de lishi shijie 朱熹的史世界 [Zhu Xi’s Historical World], 2 Vols. Taipei: Yunchen.
珥 (1536–1584), a prominent Neo-Confucian scholar-official in sixteenth-century Korea, endorsed the Way of the Hegemon as compatible with the Kingly Way by reconceptualizing it, otherwise predicated on strong consequentialist ethics, in a way consistent with Confucianism’s deepest concern with the well-being of the people. In Confucianizing the Way of the Hegemon through the creative re-reading of the Book of Rites from a Xunzian standpoint, Yi I proposed a new method of moral self-cultivation specifically tailored for a Confucian ruler—called political self-cultivation in this paper—that combined the traditional Neo-Confucian recovery model of self-cultivation with a strong sense of political responsibility.