The concept of meritocracy is unstable as its constituent ideas are potentially contradictory. The egalitarian aspects of meritocracy, for example, can come into conflict with its focus on talent allocation, competition, and reward. In practice, meritocracy is often transformed into an ideology of inequality and elitism. In Singapore, meritocracy has been the main ideological resource for justifying authoritarian government and its pro-capitalist orientations. Through competitive scholarships, stringent selection criteria for party candidacy, and high ministerial salaries, the ruling People's Action Party has been able to co-opt talent to form a “technocratic” government for an “administrative state.” However, as Singapore becomes more embedded in the processes of globalization, it will experience new forms of national crisis, alternative worldviews through global communications technology, and a widening income gap, all of which will force its ideology of meritocracy to unravel.
Albertoni, Ettore (1987). Mosca and the Theory of Elitism. Blackwell: Oxford.
2.
Arrow, K., Bowles, S. and Durlauf, S., eds ( 2000). Meritocracy and Economic Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Au, Alex (2005). “The Political Parallels to the NKF Scandal ” YawningBread, December, URL (consulted February 2007): http://www.yawningbread.org/.
4.
Bellows, Thomas (1989). “Bridging Tradition and Modernization: The Singapore Bureaucracy,” in Hung-chao Tai (ed.), Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative?Washington, DC: WashingtonInstitute Press.
5.
Berlin, Isaiah (1969). Four Essays onLiberty. London: Oxford University Press.
6.
Cavanagh, Matt (2002). Against Equality of Opportunity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Chan, Heng Chee (1975). “Politics in an Administrative State: Where Has the Politics Gone?” in Seah Chee Meow (ed.), Trends in Singapore: Proceedings and Background Paper. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
8.
Chan, Heng Chee (1985). “Political Parties,” in Jon Quah, Chan Heng Chee and Seah Chee Meow (eds), Government and Politics of Singapore . New York: Oxford University Press .
9.
Chee, Soon Juan (1994). Dare to Change: An Alternative Vision for Singapore . Singapore: Singapore Democratic Party.
10.
Cotton, James (1993). “Political Innovation in Singapore: The Presidency, the Leadership and the Party,” in Garry Rodan (ed.), Singapore Changes Guard: Social, Political and Economic Directions in the 1990s. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
11.
Da Cunha, Derek (1997). The Price of Victory: The 1997 Singapore General Election and Beyond. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
12.
Dunn, John (1993). Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Elliott, M., Abdoolcarim, Z. and Elegant, S. (2005). “Lee Kuan Yew Reflects.” Time, December 5, URL (consulted February 2007): http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,501051212-1137705,00.html .
14.
Fernandez, Walter (1996). “Line-Up `the Best Since 1955 Election.'”The Straits Times (Singapore), May 27.
15.
George, Cherian (2006). Contentious Journalism and the Internet: Towards Democratic Discourse in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore : Singapore University Press.
16.
Goh, Chok Tong (1985). The Gordian Knot: Is There an Upper Limit to our Prosperity?Singapore: Ministry of Communications and Information.
17.
Goh, Chok Tong (1986). A Developed Economy, A Cultivated Society, A Nation of Excellence. Singapore: Ministry of Communications and Information.
18.
Goh, Chok Tong (1988). Agenda for Action: Goals and Challenges. Singapore: Singapore National Printers .
19.
Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (2007). URL (consulted September 2007): http://www.gic.com.sg .
20.
Gramsci, Antonio (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (eds and trans). New York : International Publishers.
21.
Khong, Cho-Oon (1995). “Singapore: Political Legitimacy through Managing Conformity,” in Muthiah Alagappa (ed.), Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
Klitgaard, Robert (1986). Elitism and Meritocracy in Developing Countries: Selection Policies for Higher Education. Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
Lee, Hsien Loong (1998). “Ministerial Statement on Scholars and Scholarship Bonds” (parliamentary speech, March 11).
24.
Lee, Hsien Loong (2000). Speech at the National Trade Unions Congress Triennial Delegates Conference, Singapore, April 12.
25.
Lee, Kuan Yew (1998). “Singapore's Fate Depends on 300 Men,” in Han Fook Kwang, Warren Fernandez and Sumiko Tan (eds), Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and His Ideas. Singapore : Times Editions.
26.
Liew, Kim Siong (1994). “Welfarism and an Affluent Singapore,” in Derek da Cunha (ed.), Debating Singapore: Reflective Essays. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
27.
Lim, Catherine (1994). “The PAP and the People — A Great Affective Divide.” The Straits Times (Singapore) , September 3.
28.
Loh, Chee Kong (2007). “Wooing Talent in a Big Way.” Today (Singapore), February 15.
29.
McNamee, Stephen J. and Miller, Robert K. , Jr (2004). The Meritocracy Myth . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
30.
Mahbubani, Kishore (2005). Beyond the Age of Innocence: Rebuilding Trust Between America and the World. New York: Public Affairs.
31.
Mauzy, Dianne K. and Milne, R.S. (2002). Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party . London: Routledge.
32.
Quah, Jon (1988). “Singapore in 1987: Political Reforms, Control, and Economic Recovery” in Southeast Asian Affairs 1988 . Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
33.
Reuters (2007). “Singapore PM to Donate Pay Hike After Salary Furore.” Reuters News, April 11.
34.
Rodan, Garry (1996). “Class Transformations and Political Tensions in Singapore's Development,” in Richard Robison and David Goodman (eds), The New Rich in Asia: Mobile Phones, McDonalds and Middle-Class Revolution . London: Routledge.
35.
Rodan, Garry (2004). Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London: Routledge.
36.
Roemer, John E. (2000). “Equality of Opportunity,” in Kenneth Arrow, Samuel Bowles and Steven Durlauf (eds), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Root, Hilton (1996). Small Countries, Big Lessons: Governance and the Rise of East Asia. Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Sai, Siew Min and Huang, Jianli (1999). “The `Chinese-Educated' Political Vanguards: Ong Pang Boon, Lee Khoon Choy and Jek Yeun Thong,” in Lam Peng Er and Kevin Tan (eds), Lee's Lieutenants: Singapore's Old Guard. New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.
39.
Seah, Chee Meow (1985). “The Civil Service,” in Jon Quah, Chan Heng Chee and Seah Chee Meow (eds), Government and Politics of Singapore . New York: Oxford University Press .
40.
Seah, Chiang Nee (2005). “NKF Issue Raising Questions on Long-Standing Policies.” The Sunday Star (Malaysia), December 25.
41.
Seah, Chiang Nee (2006). “Political Elitism Takes an Emotive Turn .” The Sunday Star (Malaysia), October 29.
42.
Sen, Amartya (2000). “Merit and Justice,” in Kenneth Arrow, Samuel Bowles and Steven Durlauf (eds), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Sim, Soek-Fang (2006). “Hegemonic Authoritarianism and Singapore: Economics, Ideology and the Asian Economic Crisis,” Journal of Contemporary Asia36(2): 143—59.
44.
Singapore Department of Statistics (2000). “ Is Income Disparity Increasing in Singapore?” Occasional Paper on Social Statistics, May. URL (consulted April 2007 ): http://www.singstat.gov.sg/papers/op/op-s6.pdf .
45.
Singapore Department of Statistics (2002). “ Income Distribution and Inequality Measures in Singapore.” Paper presented at the Conference on Chinese Population and Socioeconomic Studies: Utilizing the 2000/2001 Round Census Data, Hong Kong, June 19—21. URL (consulted April 2007): http://www.singstat.gov.sg/papers/seminar/income2000.pdf.
46.
Singapore Department of Statistics (2007). “ Key Household Income Trends 2006.” Occasional Paper on Income Statistics, February. URL (consulted April 2007): http://www.singstat.gov.sg/papers/op/op-s12.pdf.
47.
Slack, Jennifer D. (1996). “The Theory and Method of Articulation in Cultural Studies” in David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
48.
Tan, Dorothy (2006). “The Political Blog: The Struggle for Hegemony in Singapore's Emerging Blogosphere.” Honors Thesis, National University of Singapore.
49.
Temasek Holdings (2007). URL (consulted September 2007): http://www.temasekholdings.com.sg.
50.
The Straits Times (2007). “ That Blog Spat: A*Star Tells Why It Wanted To Sue Student.” The Straits Times (Singapore), March 30.
51.
Vennewald, Werner (1994). “Technocrats in the State Enterprise System of Singapore.” Asia Research Centre Working Paper 32 (November).
52.
Vogel, Ezra (1989). “A Little Dragon Tamed” in Kernial Singh Sandhu and Paul Wheatley (eds), Management of Success: The Moulding of Modern Singapore. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
53.
Walker, Iain and Smith, Heather J. (2001). “Fifty Years of Relative Deprivation Research,” in Iain Walker and Heather J. Smith (eds), Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Worthington, Ross (2003). Governance in Singapore. London : Routledge.
55.
Young PAP (1996). Young PAP 10th Anniversary 1996. Singapore: Young PAP.
56.
Yu-Foo, Yee Shoon (2006). Speech during the Committee of Supply Debate, Singapore, March 9. URL (consulted April 2007 ): http://app.mcys.gov.sg/web/corp_speech_story.asp?szMod=corp&szSubMod=speech&qid=2622 .
