Nationalism and Pluralism and the Process of Political Development in Eastern Europe

Abstract

This paper examines the interaction of nationalism, pluralism and political development in six countries of Eastern Europe from the end of World War II up to the 1980s. To make the analysis more manageable, nationalism is conceptualized as national political culture and pluralism is identified by the presence of interest groups. Both these concepts, of course, play a major role in the process of all political development. The paper's main question concerns the ability of the countries under discussion to weather the developmental crises that have descended upon the region in the current decade.

Of the six East European countries examined, only Hungary has succeeded reasonably well in its task of crisis management. Furthermore, it is both the national political cultures and the groups in the respective countries examined that have been largely responsible for the varying degrees of political development. Finally, on the strength of the experience in the 1980s, it is assumed that both these factors will play an even more important role in the region in the years to come.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almond, G.A. and G.B. Powell, Jr. (1966). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

Barghoorn, F.C. (1966). Politics in the USSR Boston : Little, Brown and Co.

Deutsch, K.W. (1966). Nationalism and Social Communication , 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Huntington, S.P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press .

Huntington, S.P. (1971). "The Change to Come." Comparative Politics, vol. 3, no. 3.

Kariel, H.S. (1968). "Pluralism." In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (D. L. Sills, ed.), vol. 12. New York: The Macmillan Co.

Korbonski, A. (1980). "Political Development and Political Decay: The Case of Eastern Europe." (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.).

La Palombara, J. (1971). "Penetration: A Crisis of Government Capacity." In Crises and Sequences in Political Development (L. Binder, et al.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

New York Times, 20 April 1986, 15 February 1987; and 4 April 1987, 21 May 1987.

10.

Pye, L.W. (1966). Aspects of Political Development Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

11.

Pye, L.W. (1971). "Identity and Political Culture." In Crises and Sequences in Political Development (L. Binder, et al.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

12.

Pye, L. W. and S. Verba, eds. (1965). Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

13.

Shartlet, R.S. (1969). "Concept Formation in Political Science and Communist Studies: Conceptualizing Political Participation." In Communist Studies and the Social Sciences (F. J. Fleron, Jr., ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.

14.

Shoup, P. (1962). "Communism, Nationalism and the Growth aofthe Communist Community of Nations after World War II.' The American Political Science Review, vol. lvi, no. 4.

15.

Shoup, P. (1972). "The National Questions and the Political Systems of Eastern Europe." In Eastern Europe in the 1970s (I. Deak and P. C. Lutz, eds.). New York: Praeger.

16.

Skilling, H.G. (1980). "Pluralism in Communist Societies: Straw Men and Red Herrings." Studies in Comparative Communism , vol. xiii, no. 1.

17.

Skilling, H.G. (1983). "Interest Groups and Communist Politics Revisited," World Politics, vol. xxxvi, no. 1.

18.

Sugar, P. F. and I. J. Lederer, eds. (1969). Nationalism in Eastern Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

19.

Weiner, M. (1971). "Political Participation: Crisis of the Political Process." In Crises and Sequences in Political Development (L. Binder, et al.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.