The definition of a disaster is followed by an explanation of vulnerability and social capital theories. The importance of using a sound theoretical framework and the utility and efficacy of vulnerability and social capital theories in studying the impact of natural disasters on the elderly population are emphasized and discussed. The conclusion is that an integrated vulnerability and social capital framework has much merit and potential in studying the impact of natural disasters on the elderly and other populations.
AlexanderD. (2005). An interpretation of disaster in terms of changes in culture, society and international relations. In PerryR. W.QuarantelliE. L. (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 1-15). Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.
2.
AlwangJ.SiegelP. B. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines (Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 0115). Washington DC: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, The World Bank.
3.
AndersonM.WoodrowP. (1998). Rising from the ashes: Development strategies in times of disaster. London, England: IT Publications.
BankoffG. (2003). Cultures of disaster: Society and natural hazards in the Philippians. London, England: Rutledge Curzon.
6.
BlaikieP. T.CannonT.DavisI.WisnerB. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’ vulnerability and disasters. London, England: Routledge.
7.
BolinB. (2006). Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In RodriguezH.QuarantelliE.DynesR. (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 113-129). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
BolinR.KlenowD. (1982-1983). Response of the elderly to disaster: An age-stratified analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6, 283-296.
CherniackE. (2008). The impact of natural disasters on the elderly. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 3, 133-139.
11.
ConwayT.NortonA. (2002). Poverty, risk and rights: new directions in social protection. Development Policy Review, 20, 533-540.
12.
CoonR. (1986). A theoretical examination of double jeopardy: Using theory as a guide to concept analysis. Mid-American Review of Sociology, 1(11), 67-90.
13.
CutterS.BoruffB.ShirleyW. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 242-261.
14.
CutterS.EmrichC. (2005). Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the U.S. increasing?EOS: Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 86, 381-389.
15.
DavisM. (2007). Planet of slums. New York, NY: Verso.
16.
DurantT.SultanD. (2008). The impact of Hurricane Katrina on the race and class divide in America. In ManningM. (Ed.), Seeking higher ground: The race, public policy & Hurricane Katrina crisis reader (pp. 191-202). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
DynesR. (2002). The importance of social capital in disaster response (Preliminary Paper 327). Newark: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center.
18.
FernandezL.ByardD.LinC.BensonS.BarberaJ. A. (2002). Frail elderly as disaster victims: Emergency management strategies. Prehospital Disaster Medicine, 17(2), 67-74.
19.
FreudenburgW. (1997). Contamination, corrosion, and social order: An overview. Current Sociology, 45(3), 19-39.
20.
FritzC. (1961). Disasters. In MertonR.NesbitR. A. (Eds.), Contemporary social problems: An introduction to deviant behavior and social disorganization (pp. 651-694). Riverside: University of California Press.
21.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
GibsonMary Jo (2006). We can do better, lessons for protecting older persons in disasters. Washington, D.C.: AARP Public Policy Institute.
24.
GillD.PicouJ. S.RitchieL. (2003). When disaster is a crime: Legal issues and the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In HarperD. W.FrailingK. (Eds.), Crime and criminal justice (pp. 61-82). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
25.
HagenJ. (2006). Protecting the elderly in times of disaster: The critical need for comprehensive disaster planning and exercise design. Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table. Retrieved from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/_/print/PrintArticle.aspx?id=192639846
26.
HansjurgensB. (2007). Megacities, risk and social vulnerabilities. Paper presented at the Center for Environmental Research, Helmholtz Gemeinschaft Research Program. Leipzig, Germany.
27.
HelpAge International. (2000). Older people in disasters and humanitarian crisis: Guidelines for best practices. London, England: Author.
28.
HewittK. (1997). Regions of risk: A geographical introduction to disasters. Essex, England: Longman.
KilijanekT.DrabekT. (1979). Assessing long-term impacts of a natural disaster: A focus on the elderly. The Gerontologist, 19, 555-566.
31.
KrauseN. (1987). Exploring the impact of a natural disaster on the health and psychological well-being of older adults. Journal of Human Stress, 13(2), 61-69.
32.
KrepsG.DrabekT. (1996). Disaster as non-routine social problems. International Journal of Mass Emergence and Disasters, 14, 129-153.
33.
KubaM.DorianA.KuljianS.ShoafK. (2004, August). Elderly population in disasters: Recounting evacuation processes from two skilled-care facilities in Central Florida (Quick Response Research Report 172). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters.
34.
LinN. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital theory and research (pp. 3-25). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
35.
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. (2005). Parish health profiles: A tool for community health planning. Baton Rouge, LA: Author.
36.
MillerD.RiveraJ. (2010). Setting the stage: Roots of social inequality and the human tragedy of Hurricane Katrina. In BatesK.SwanR. (Eds.), Through the eye of Katrina: Social justice in the United States (pp. 17-34). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
37.
MyersC. (2005). Population change and social vulnerability in the wake of disasters: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Master’s thesis). Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
38.
NgoE. (2001). When disaster and age collide: Reviewing vulnerability of the elderly. Natural Hazards Review, 2(2), 80-89.
39.
NorrisF.MurrellS. (1988). Prior experience as a moderator of disaster impact on anxiety symptoms in older adults. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 665-683.
40.
OsmondM.WambachK.HarrisonD.ByersJ.LevineP.ImersheinA.QuadagnaD. (1993). The multiple jeopardy of race, class, and gender for AIDS risk among women. Gender and Society, 7, 99-120.
PalmoreE.MantonK. (1973). Ageism compared to racism and sexism. Journal of Gerontology, 28, 363-369.
43.
PaxtonP. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88-127.
44.
PeacockW.RagsdaleA. (1997). Social systems, ecological networks and disasters, Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
PedroS. (2006). Delineating hurricane vulnerable populations in Orleans Parish, Louisiana (Master’s thesis). Department of Environmental Studies, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
46.
PerryR. W. (2007). What is a disaster? In RodriguezH.QurantelliE.DynesR. (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: Springer.
47.
PhillipsB.ChildersC.ThomasD.FothergillA. (Eds.). (2010). Social vulnerability to disaster. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
48.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern society. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
49.
PoulshockS.CohenE. (1975). The elderly in the aftermath of a disaster. The Gerontologist, 15, 357-361.
50.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York, NY: Touchstone.
51.
QuarantelliE. (2005). What is a disaster? Perspectives on the Question. London, England: Routledge.
52.
RitchieL.GillD. (2007). Social capital theory as an integrating theoretical framework in technological disaster research. Sociological Spectrum, 27, 103-129.
53.
RobertoK. A.KamoY.HendersonT. L. (2009). Encounters with Katrina: Older adults’ social support networks. In CherryK. E (Ed.), Lifepsan perspectives on disasters: Coping with Katrina, Rita, and other storms (pp. 122-152). New York, NY: Springer.
54.
RonanK.JohnstonD. (2005). Promoting resilience in disasters: The role for schools, youth, and families. New York, NY: Springer.
55.
RudowitzR.RowlandD.ShartzerA. (2006). Health care in New Orleans before and after Hurricane Katrina. Health Affairs, 25, 393-406.
56.
SchullerT.BaronS.FieldJ. (2000). Social capital: A review and critique. In BaronS.FieldJ.SchullerT. (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspective (pp. 1-38). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Social Science Research Council. (2006). Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the social sciences. Retrieved from http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/
59.
StorbergJ. (2000). The evolution of capital theory: A critique of a theory of social capital and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 468-499.
60.
TierneyK. (2006). Social inequality, hazards, and disasters. In DanielsR.KettlD.KunreutherH. (Eds.), On risk and disaster (pp. 109-127). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
61.
TwiggJ. (2001, March). Sustainable livelihood and vulnerability to disasters (Disaster Management Working Paper). London, England: Benfield Greig Hazard Research Center for the Disaster Mitigation Institute.
62.
The Urban Institute. (2005). Katrina demographics of a disaster. Washington, DC: Office of Public Affairs.
63.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Profile of general demographic characteristics, New Orleans. Washington, DC: Author.
64.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Current population survey. Washington D.C: Author.
65.
WisnerB.BlaikieP.CannonT.DavisI. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’ vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
66.
ZhoabaoJ.TianW.LiuW.CaoY.YanJ.ShunZ. (2010). Are the elderly more vulnerable to psychological impact of natural disaster? A population-based survey of adult survivors of the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake. BMC Public Health, 10, 1-11.
