Peer Review in Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

Peer review of histopathology findings in safety assessment studies involving rodents and other animals is a relatively recent procedure in toxicologic pathology. It serves to ensure the integrity of the pathology evaluation in safety studies, encourages consistency of diagnostic criteria and use of common terminology, and provides a method of continuing education for participants. The use of a standardized system of pathology nomenclature and diagnostic criteria, such as the Society of Toxicologic Pathologist's Guides for Toxicologic Pathology, is of great value in the procedure. Pathology reviews may involve government-sponsored bioassay programs, in-house industrial corporations, or individual peer reviews suggested or required by government regulatory agencies. Pathology Working Groups can be an integral part of the review process. The extent of the peer review is primarily dependent on the study results; however, other variables such as confidence of the data, study size and duration, complexity, and purpose are also important considerations. Essential components of any peer review, however, include selection of tissues/lesions for review, by a reviewing pathologist, discrepancy resolution, data modification, and documentation of all aspects of the review process. Specific procedures for pathology peer review are discussed. Disagreements among pathologists discovered in peer reviews can be resolved by several methods and examples will be presented. The entire pathology peer review process should be a learning experience for all involved and can help ensure the integrity of animal toxicology studies used for important regulatory decisions involving the use of chemicals in our society.

Keywords

Pathology working group (PWG)toxicology expert panel carcinogenesis bioassay

References

Boorman GA and Eustis SL (1986). The pathology working group as a means for assuring pathology quality in toxicological studies. In: Managing Conduct and Data Quality of Toxicology Studies, KB Hoover , JK Baldwin , AF Velner , CE Whitmire , CL Davies , and DW Bristol (eds). Princeton Scientific Publishing, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 271-275.

Boorman GA , Eustis SL , Elwell MR , Montgomery CA Jr , and MacKenzie WF (1990). Pathology of the Fischer Rat. Academic Press, San Diego. 580 pp.

Boorman GA , Montgomery CA Jr , Eustis SL , Wolfe MJ , McConnell EE , and Hardisty JF (1985). Quality assurance in pathology for rodent carcinogenicity studies. In: Handbook of Carcinogen Testing, HA Milman and EK Weisburger (eds). Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp. 345-357.

Frith CH and Ward JM (1988). Color Atlas of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Lesions in Aging Mice. Elsevier, Amsterdam . 109 pp.

Goodman DG and Sauer RM (1992). Hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity in female Sprague-Dawley rats treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD): A pathology working group reevaluation. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 15: 245-252.

Hardisty JF (1985). Factors influencing laboratory animal spontaneous tumor profiles. Toxicol. Pathol. 13: 95-104.

Hardisty JF and Boorman GA (1986). National Toxicology Program pathology quality assurance procedures. In: Managing Conduct and Data Quality of Toxicology Studies, KB Hoover , JK Baldwin , AF Velner , CE Whitmire , CL Davies , and DW Bristol (eds). Princeton Scientific Publishing, Princeton, New Jersey , pp. 263-269.

Hardisty JF and Eustis SL (1990). Toxicological pathology: A critical stage in study interpretation. In: Progress in Predictive Toxicology, DB Clayson , IC Munro , P Shubik , and JA Swenberg (eds). Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. , Amsterdam, pp. 41-62.

Huff JE , Bates R. , Eustis SL , Haseman JK , and McConnell EE (1985). Malathion and malaoxon: Histopathology reexamination of the National Cancer Institute's carcinogenesis studies. Environ. Res. 37: 154-173.

10.

Kociba RJ , Keyes DG , Beyer JE , Carreon RM , Wade CE , Dittenber DA , Kalnins RP Grauson LE , Park CN , Barnard SD , Hummel RA , and Humiston CG (1978). Results of a two-year chronic toxicity and oncogenicity study of 2,3,7,8.-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 46: 279-303.

11.

McConnell EE and Eustis SL (1994). Peer review in carcinogenicity bioassays: Uses abuses. Toxicol. Pathol . 22: 141-144.

12.

McGee JH , Butler WH , Willigan DA , Brown WR , and Sofia RD (1993). Critique of the toxicology and carcinogenesis of iodinated glycerol in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 18: 169-180.

13.

Mohr U. , Bader R. , Ernst H. , Ettlin R. , Gembardt C. , Harleman JH , Hartig F. , Jahn W. , Kaliner G. , Karbe E. , Kaufmann W. , Krieg K. , Krinke G. , Kuttler K. , Landes C. , Mettler F. , Morawietz G. , Notman J. , Puschner H. , Qureshi , Reznik G. , Rittinghausen S. , Tuch K. , Urwyler H. , Weisse G. , Weisse I. , and Zehnder J. (1990). Tumor registry data base. Exp. Pathol. 38: 1-18.

14.

NTP General Statement of Work (Revised April 1987). National Toxicology Program (NTP) general statement of work for the conduct of toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in laboratory animals.

15.

Parker CM , Van Gelder GA , Chai EY , Gellatly JBM , Serota DG , Voelker RW , and Vesselinovitch SD (1985). Oncogenic evaluation of tetrachlorvinphos in the B6C3F1 mouse. Fund. Appl. Toxicol . 5: 840-854.

16.

Reuber MD (1985). Carcinogenicity and toxicity of malathion and malaoxon. Environ. Res. 37: 119-153.

17.

Schoenig GP , Goldenthal EI , Geil RG , Frith CH , Richter WR , and Carborg FW (1985). Evaluation of the dose response and in utero exposure to saccharin in the rat. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 23: 475-490.

18.

Society of Toxicologic Pathologists (1990). Guides for Toxicologic Pathology: Standardized System of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, D.C.

19.

Society of Toxicologic Pathologists (1991). Peer review in toxicologic pathology: Some recommendations . Toxicol. Pathol. 19: 290-292.

20.

Squire RA (1985). Histopathological evaluation of rat urinary bladders from the IRDC two-generation bioassay of sodium saccharin. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 23:491-497.

21.

Squire RA , Brinkhous KM , Peiper SC , Firminger HI , Mann RB , and Strandberg JD (1981). Histiocytic sarcoma with a granuloma-like component occurring in a large colony of Sprague Dawley rats. Am. J. Pathol. 105: 21-30.

22.

Streett CS (1988). Editorial: Standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria in toxicologic pathology. Toxicol. Pathol. 16: 305-306.

23.

Swenberg JA (1981). Quality assurance in pathology. In: Scientific Considerations in Monitoring and Evaluating Toxicological Research , EJ Gralla (ed). Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C. , pp. 79-87.

24.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987). Pathology Raw Data Definition as It Relates to Pathology Data Trails and Independent Pathology Peer Review System. PR Notice 87-10.

25.

Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology, Inc. (1980). Re-evaluation of the Pathology Findings of Studies on Nitrite and Cancer: Histologic Lesions in Sprague-Dawley. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 231 pp.

26.

Ward JM , Goodman DG , Griesemer RA , Hardisty JF , Schueler RL , Squire RA , and Strandberg JD (1978). Quality assurance of pathology in rodent carcinogenesis tests. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2: 371-378.