Requests to write letters of reference for former teachers place principals and other school administrators in a position of potential liability. Following established policies, along with documentation of fair and objective treatment of all such requests, lessens exposure to successful legal actions for school administrators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, K., and M. D. Alexander. 1992. American public school law, 3d ed.St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.
2.
Chestnut, W v The Hill School, etval., 718 A.2d 336 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 1997) Defamation, libel and slander, Code of Ala. 6-5-186 (1998)
3.
Gifis, S. H., ed. 1996. Law dictionary, 4th ed.Hauppauge, N.Y.: Barron's Educational Series, Inc.
4.
Hartmeister, F.1998. Employment reference response strategies in K-12 schools: Harmonizing policies and practices with ethical standards and professional responsibilities. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education11: 269-287.
5.
Hett v Ploetz, 121 N.W.2d 270 (Wis. 1963)
6.
Ingersoll, B. 1996. Unchecked rumors result in $10 million defamation award to ex-schoolteacher. Pennsylvania Employment Law Letter 5.
7.
Pierce v St. Vrain Valley School District RE-IJ, P.2d, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. 44639 rehearing denied, P.2d (1997)
8.
Randi W v Muroc Joint UJnified School District, 929 P.2d 582 (Cal. 1997).
9.
Richmond v White Mountain Recreation Ass'n, Inc., 140 N.H. 755 (1996).
10.
Robinson v Shell Oil Co., US., 117 S. Ct. 843 (1997)
11.
Statements relating to public duty, O.C.G.A. 51-5-7 (1998)
