Deleuze and the Body Without Organs

Abstract

This article examines the possibilities for resistant feminine body identity through the lens of Deleuzian feminism. To do this, the author relies on Deleuze's critique of philosophical thought that constructs identity as a series of dichotomous oppositions. According to Deleuze, this process takes place within three dominant strata—organism, significance, and subjectification—that limit the creative potential of theorizing bodily identity. The author further examines Deleuze's alternative, positive approach to disreading bodily identity through such concepts as plane of consistency, assemblange, and the Body without Organs. Finally, the author aims to illustrate the usefulness of Deleuzian philosophy to researchers of sport and exercise through an application into women's fitness practices. More specifically, the author analyzes how Pilates, as a set of exercise practices, might assist in a creation of a Body without Organs.

Keywords

Deleuze femininity fitness identity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Toward a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Bray, A. , & Colebrook, C. (1998). The haunted flesh: Corporeal feminism and the politics of (dis) embodiment. Signs, 24(1), 35-67.

Currier, D. (2003). Feminist technological futures: Deleuze and body/technology assemblages. Feminist Theory, 4, 321-338.

Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. London: Athlone.

Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism & schizophrenia. London: Athlone.

Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Verso.

Dworkin, S. (2003). Awoman's place is in the... cardiovascular room?? Gender relations, the body, and the gym. In A. Bolin & J. Granskog (Eds.), Athletics intruders: Ethnographic research on women, culture, and exercise(pp. 131-158). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Gallagher, S. , & Kryzanowska, R. (1999). The Pilates method of body conditioning. Philadelphia: Bain Bridge Books.

Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

10.

Haravon Collins, L. (2002). Working out the contradictions: Feminism and aerobics. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 26, 85-109.

11.

King, M. , & Green, Y. (2003). Pilates: The complete body system. London: Michell Beazley.

12.

Loland Waaler, N. (2000). The art of concealment in a culture of display: Aerobicizing women's and men's experience and use of their own bodies. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 111-129.

13.

Maguire, J. ,& Mansfield, L. (1998). “No-body's perfect”: Women, aerobics, and the body beautiful. Sociology of Sport Journal, 15, 109-137.

14.

Markula, P. (1995). Firm but shapely, fit but sexy, strong but thin: The postmodern aerobicizing female bodies. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 424-453.

15.

Markula, P. (2003a). Postmodern aerobics: Contradiction and resistance. In A. Bolin & J. Granskog (Eds.), Athletics intruders: Ethnographic research on women, culture, and exercise(pp. 53-78). Albany: State University of New York Press.

16.

Markula, P. (2003b). The technologies of the self: Sport, feminism and Foucault. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 87-107.

17.

McDermott, L. (2000). Aqualitative assessment of the significance of body perception towomen's physical activity experiences: Revisiting discussion of physicalities. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 331-363.

18.

Olkowski, D. (2000). Body, knowledge and becoming-woman: Morpho-logic in Deleuze and Irigaray. In I. Buchanan & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Deleuze and feminist theory(pp. 86-109). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.