Given the amalgam of neo-liberal, neo-scientist and neo-conservative forces that frame higher education_safeguarding science and medicine at the expense of arts, humanities and the social sciences_the very existence and continuance of the sociology of sport is imperiled perhaps more than ever. In this moment, and not surprisingly, the epistemological corroborator of these forces is once again championed; there has been an aggressive push towards _science_ defined by evidence based programmes, policies and practices (EBR) as the sole and legitimate avenue for academic survival. Heralded as the _gold_ standard of academic research, and forged through university-industry-government partnerships, the evidence based research mantra emphasizes a shift towards corporate principles of efficiency, accountability and profit maximization. As such, within this paper, we discuss the creeping EBR-based epistemological orthodoxy that is seeping into the critical sociological study of sport, arguing that it threatens to neuter the political and critical potentialities of our field. We propose that pandering to EBR, compromises everything that critical sporting intellectuals strive for and believe in; it is a powerful virus of sorts that speaks against our ontological, axiological, epistemological, methodological and political approaches and offers nothing but collusion with, and explicit support for, existing regimes of power.
Amis, J.M., & Silk, M.L. ( 2008). The philosophy and politics of quality in qualitative organizational research. Organizational research Methods, 11, 456-480.
2.
Atkinson, M. ( 2007). Playing with fire: Masculinity, health, and sports supplements . Sociology of Sport Journal, 24, 165-186.
3.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. ( 1999). Ethnography: Post, past and present. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 460-471.
4.
Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. ( 2005). Analytic perspectives. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 821-840). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
Barnett, R., & Griffin, A. (Eds.). (1997). The end of knowledge in higher education. London: Cassell .
6.
Barton, B. ( 2007). Managing the toll of stripping: Boundary setting among exotic dancers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 36, 571-596.
7.
Bauman, Z. ( 1999). In search of politics. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
8.
Bauman, Z. ( 2005). Afterthought: on writing; on writing sociology . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1089-1098). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Becker, H. ( 1967). "Whose side are we on?" Social Problems , 14, 239-247.
10.
Bhattacharjee, Y. ( 2008, January 4). Democrat: Barack Obama. Science , 319, 28a-29a.
11.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. ( 1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis . London: Heinemann.
12.
Carrington, B. ( 2001). Decentering the Centre: Cultural Studies in Britain and its legacy. In T. Miller (Ed.), A companion to cultural studies (pp. 275-297). Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
Carrington, B. ( 2008). "What_s the Footballer Doing Here?" Racialized performativity, reflexivity, and identity. Cultural Studies _ Critical Methodologies, 8, 423-452.
14.
Cheek, J. ( 2006). The challenge of tailor-made research quality: The RQF in Australia. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds). (2006). Qualitative research and the conservative challenge (pp. 127-148). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15.
Christians, C. ( 1997). The ethics of being in a communications context . In C. Christians & M. Taber (Eds.) Communication ethics and universal values (pp. 3-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
Christians, C. ( 2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
Clegg, S.R. ( 2002). "Lives in the balance": A comment on Hinings and Greenwood_s "Disconnects and consequences in organization theory?" Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 428-441.
18.
Curtis, P. ( 2009). Pointless university studies to be weeded out by new government panel. Retrieved December 16, 2009, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/sep/23/panel-funding-university-research
19.
Davies, B. ( 2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 26(1), 1-14.
20.
Delanty, G. ( 1998). The idea of the university in the global era: From knowledge as an end to the end of knowledge? Social Epistemology , 12(1), 3-26.
21.
Denzin, N. ( 2004a). The war on culture; The war on truth. Cultural Studies _ Critical Methodologies, 4(2), 137-142.
22.
Denzin, N. ( 2004b). Crossroads in cultural studies, 2004 Mandate . Retrieved July 26, 2004, from http://cultstud.org/previous/Crossroads2004/CrossroadsProgram.pdf
23.
Denzin, N., & Giardina, M. (Eds). (2006). Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
24.
Denzin, N.K. ( 2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 897-922). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Denzin, N.K. ( 2002a). Cultural studies in America after September 11th, 2001 . Cultural Studies _ Critical Methodologies, 2, 5-8.
26.
Denzin, N.K. ( 2002b). Confronting ethography_s crisis of representation . Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31, 482-490.
27.
Denzin, N.K. ( 2003). Performative ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
Denzin, N.K. ( 2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 933-958). Thousand Oaks, CA.
29.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2003). 9/11 in American culture. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
31.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA.
32.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., & Giardina, M.D. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 769-782.
33.
Descartes, R. ( 1637). Discourse on method. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
34.
Dimitriadis, G. ( 2006). On the production of expert knowledge: Revisiting Edward Said_s work on the intellectual. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27, 369-382.
35.
Edensor, T., & Richards, S. ( 2006). Snowboarders vs. skiers: Contested choreographies of the slopes. Leisure Studies, 25(1), 97-113.
36.
Evans, M. ( 2004). Killing thinking: The death of the universities . London: Continuum.
37.
Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. ( 2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
Freire, P. ( 1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York : Continuum.
39.
Freshwater, D., & Rolfe, G. ( 2004). Deconstructing evidence based practice. New York: Routledge.
40.
Frith, S. ( 2001). Checking the books: what are universities for ? Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 88-93.
41.
Frow, J., & Morris, M. ( 2000). Cultural studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 315-346). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
Fukuyama, F. ( 2006). America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43.
Giroux, H. ( 2001a). "Something_s missing": Cultural studies, neoliberalism and the politics of hope. Strategies, 14, 227-252.
44.
Giroux, H. ( 2001b). Cultural Studies as performative politics. Cultural Studies _ Critical Methodologies, 1, 5-23.
45.
Giroux, H. ( 2004). War talk, the death of the social, and the disappearing children: Remembering the Other War. Cultural Studies _ Critical Methodologies, 4, 206-211.
46.
Giroux, H. ( 2005). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
47.
Giroux, H.A. ( 1999). Corporate culture and the attack on higher education and public schooling. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Goldenberg, M.J. ( 2006). On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science. Social Science and Medicine , 62, 2621-2632.
50.
Grossberg, L. ( 2005). Caught in the crossfire: Kids, politics and America_s future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
51.
Grossberg, L. ( 2006). Does cultural studies have futures? Should it? (Or what_s the matter with New York? Cultural studies, contexts and conjunctures. Cultural Studies, 20, 1, 1-32.
52.
Hall S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. ( 1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order . London: Macmillan.
53.
Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., Brown, P., & Wells, A. S. (Eds.). (1997). Education, culture, economy, society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
Hammersley, M. ( 2000). Taking sides in social research: Essays on partisanship and bias. London: Routledge.
55.
Harvey, D. ( 2003). The new imperialism. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
56.
Hogan, J. ( 2003). Staging the nation: Gendered and ethnicized discourses of national identity in Olympic opening ceremonies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 27(2), 100-123.
57.
hooks, b. ( 1990).Yearning: Race, gender and cultural politics. Boston: South End.
58.
House, E.R. ( 2003) Bush_s neo-fundamentalism and the new politics of evaluation. Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, 2. http://www.upi.artisan.se/docs/doc187.pdf (accessed 14 December 2009)
59.
House, E.R. ( 2005). Qualitative evaluation and changing social policy . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1069-1082). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
House, E.R. ( 2006). Methodological fundamentalism and the quest for control(s) . In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds), Qualitative research and the conservative challenge (pp. 93-108). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
61.
Kincheloe, J. ( 2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 679-692.
62.
Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. ( 2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research . In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303-342). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
63.
King, S.J. ( 2006). Pink ribbons, Inc.: Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
Kuhn, T. ( 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
Lakoff, G. ( 2006). Whose freedom? The battle over America_s most important idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
66.
Lather, P. ( 2006). This is your father_s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. In N. Denzin. & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative research and the conservative challenge . Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press .
67.
Lincoln, Y. ( 2001). An emerging new bricoleur: Promises and possiblities-A reaction to Joe Kincheloe_s "describing the bricoleur." Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 693-705.
68.
Lincoln, Y., & Canella, G. ( 2004). Dangerous discourses, methodological fundamentalism, and governmental regimes of truth. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 5-14.
69.
Lincoln, Y., & Denzin, N. ( 2005). Epilogue: The eighth and ninth moments: Qualitative research in/ and the fractured future. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1115-1126). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
70.
Lipsett, A. ( 2009). Cash for university arts under threat. Retrieved, December 16, 2009, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/jan/28/universityfunding-arts
71.
Markula, P. ( 2003). The technologies of the self: Sport, feminism, and Foucault . Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 87-107.
72.
Merton, R.K. ( 1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1942 )
73.
Miller, T. ( 2001). What it is and what it isn_t: Introducing . . . cultural studies. In T. Miller (Ed.), A companion to cultural studies (pp. 1-20). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
74.
Morse, J. ( 2006). The politics of evidence. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative research and the conservative challenge . Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press .
75.
Murray, S.J., Holmes, D., Perron, A., & Rail, G. ( 2007). No exit? Intellectual integrity under the regime of "evidence" and "best-practices."Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice , 13, 512-516.
76.
Murray, S.J., Holmes, D., & Rail, G. ( 2008). On the constitution and status of "evidence" in the health sciences. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 272-280.
77.
Obama, B., & Biden, J. ( 2008). Investing in America_s future. Retrieved February 18, 2009, from http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/FactSheetScience.pdf
78.
Olssen, M., & Peters, M.A. ( 2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 313-345.
79.
Pringle, R. ( 2001). Competing discourses: Narratives of a fragmented self, manliness and Rugby Union. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 36, 425-440.
80.
Readings, B. ( 1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
Richardson, L. ( 2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
82.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. ( 2006). Edward Said and the cultural politics of education . Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 27, 293-308.
83.
Rose, N. ( 2000). Community, citizenship and the third way. American Behavioural Scientist, 43, 1395-1411.
84.
Said, E. ( 1994). Representations of the intellectual. New York: Pantheon.
85.
Said, E.W. ( 1983). The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
Saltman, K.J. ( 2003). The strong arm of the law. Body and Society , 9(4), 49-67.
87.
Sassen, S. ( 2000). The global city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
88.
Silk, M., & Andrews, D. ( 2006) The fittest city in America. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30(3), 1-13.
89.
Silk, M. & Andrews, D. (in press). Introduction: Physical Cultural Studies (Special Issue of the Sociology of Sport Journal).
90.
Silk, M., & Falcous, M. ( 2005). One day in September/A week in February: Mobilizing American (sporting) nationalisms. Sociology of Sport Journal , 22, 447-471.
91.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. ( 2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. London: John Hopkins University Press.
92.
Smith, J.K., & Hodkinson, P. ( 2005). Relativism, criteria, and politics. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 915-932). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
93.
Tisdall, S. ( 2009, January 4). Obama is losing a battle he doesn_t know he_s in. Guardian Unlimited, Retrieved February 18, 2009, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/04/obama-gaza-israel
94.
Truman, C., Mertons, D., & Humphries, B. (Eds.). (2000 ). Research and Inequality. London: Routledge.
