Affholter, D. and M. Nauta ( 1980) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program: The Infant-Toddler Component and Child Impact. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
2.
Affholter, D., D. Connell, K. Hewett, and S. Weiss (1979) Report of the Baseline Data—Evaluation of the Child and Family ResourceProgram, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
3.
Anderberg, M.R. (1973) Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York: Academic.
4.
Anderson, S., A. Auquier, W.W. Hauck, D. Oakes, W. Vandaele, H.I. Weisberg, with contributions from A.S. Bryk and J. Kleinman (1980) Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction . New York: John Wiley.
5.
Barnow, B.S., G.C. Cain, and A.S. Goldberger ( 1980) "Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias," pp. 43-59 in E. W. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas (eds.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 5. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Blu Mstein, A. and J. Coh En (1979) "Control of selection effects in the evaluation of social programs." Evaluation Q.3, 4: 583-608.
7.
Bryk, A.S. and H.I. Weisberg (1976) "Value-added analysis: a dynamic approach to the estimation of treatment effects." J. of Educ. StatisticsI: 127-155.
8.
Campbell, D.T. and J.C. Stanley (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally .
9.
Carew, J.V. (1980) Experience and the Development of intelligence in Young Children at Home and in Day Care. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 183Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
10.
——— J. Rosenberger, B. Allen, P. Spriggs, and G. Massey (1978) Toddler and Infant Experiences System. Oakland, CA: TIES Project.
11.
Cronbach, L.J., D. Rogosa, R.E. Floden, and G. Price ( 1976) Analysis of Covariance—Angel of Salvation or Temptress and Deluder? Occasional Paper, Stanford Evaluation Consortium . Stanford, CA: Stanford University .
12.
Director, S.M. ( 1979) "Underadjustment bias in the evaluation of manpower training." Evaluation Q.3, 2: 190-218.
13.
Dunham, R.G. and A.L. Mauss (1979) "Evaluation of treatment programs: a statistical resolution of selection biases using the case of problem drinkers." Evaluation Q.3, 3: 411-426.
14.
Elashof, J.D. ( 1969) "Analysis of covariance: a delicate instrument ." Amer. Educ. Research J.6: 383-401.
15.
Gnanadesikan, R. ( 1977) Methods for Statistical Analysis of Multivariate Observations. New York: John Wiley .
16.
Hausman, J.A. and D.A. Wise (1980) "Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: the Gary income maintenance experiment," pp. 77-94 in E. W. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas (eds.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 5. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Heckman, J.T. (1980) "Sample selection bias as a specification error ," pp. 61-74 in E. W. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas (eds.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 5. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Hewett, K., D. Connell, D. Affholter, and S. Weiss ( 1979) Design Report Draft-Evaluation of the Child and Family ResourceProgram, vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
19.
Hubert, L.J., R.G. Golledge.T. Kenney, and C.M. Costanzo (1982) "Evaluating classification schemes used in reporting criminal justice data." Evaluation Rev.6, 4: 505-520.
20.
Johnson, L. ( 1980) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program: Phase I Program Study Report, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
21.
——— and M. NAUTA (1981) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program: Phase III Research Report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
22.
——— (1980) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program: Phase III Program Study Report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
23.
Kempthorne, O. (1975) The Design and Analysis of Experiments. Huntington, NY: Robert K. Krieger.
24.
Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936) "On the generalized distance in statistics. "Proceedings of the National Institute for Science in India2: 49-55.
25.
Mosteller, F. and J.W. Tukey (1977) Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
26.
Nauta, M. and J. Travers (1981) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program: Phase IV Analysis Issues and Measure Selection. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
27.
Nauta, M., L. Brush, L. Johnson, D. Affholter, and K. Hewett (1980) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program: Phase II Research Report, vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
28.
O'Keefe, A. (1978) "What Head Start means to families." Administration for Children, Youth and Families. (mimeo)
29.
Rubin, D.B. (1979) "Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies." J. of the Amer. Stat. Assn.74: 318-328.
30.
——— (1977) "Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate." J. of Educ. Statistics2: 1-26.
31.
——— (1976a) "Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing, I: some examples." Biometrics32, 1: 109-120; 955.
32.
——— (1976b) "Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing, II: maximums on bias reduction for fixed sample sizes ." Biometrics32, 1: 121-132; 955. ——— ( 1974) "Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and nonrandomized studies." J. of Educ. Psychology66: 688-701.
33.
——— (1973a) "Matching to remove bias in observational studies ." Biometrics29, 1: 159-183.
34.
——— (1973b) "The use of matched sampling and regression adjustments to remove bias in observational studies." Biometrics29, 1: 185-203.
35.
Travers, J., M. Nauta, and N. Irwin (1981) Evaluation of the Child and Family Resource Program-The Culture of a Social Program: An Ethnographic Study of CFRP, summary volume . Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates .