The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between marital status, marital concern, perceived impairment, health-promoting behaviors, and acceptance of disability using cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a sample of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We hypothesized that the quality and stability of the marital relationship would influence people’s ability to accept their disability and protect from accumulation of impairment over time. Furthermore, men and women would receive dissimilar benefits from marriage. These hypotheses were considered with repeated measures analysis, Pearson correlations, and independent sample t tests of data obtained from a longitudinal study of persons with MS. The findings indicate that acceptance of disability and perceived impairment increase significantly over time for men and women. For men, being married was associated with a greater acceptance of disability and less perceived impairment. Men were more concerned than the women about how MS affected their sexual relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. (2001). Divorce in women with serious illness . Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 33(5), 286 .
2.
Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1995). Psychosocial adaptation to disability and its investigation among persons with multiple sclerosis . Social Science and Medicine, 40(8), 1099-1108 .
3.
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296-298 .
4.
Britell, C., Burks, J., & Schapiro, R. (2000). Introduction to symptoms and rehabilitative management: Disease management model. In J. Burks & K. Johnson (Eds.), Multiple sclerosis: Diagnosis, medical management, and rehabilitation (pp. 215-220). New York: Demos Medical Publishing .
5.
Brown, J., & Giesy, B. (1986). Marital status of persons with spinal cord injury . Social Science and Medicine, 23(3), 313-322 .
6.
Bull, M. (2001). Interventions for women as family caregivers. In D. Taylor & N. F. Woods, (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research: Women’s health research (pp. 125-142). New York: Springer .
7.
Burton, G. (1995). Psychosocial aspects of adaptation and adjustment during various phases of neurological disability. In D. A. Umphred (Ed.), Neurological rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 179-199). New York: Mosby .
8.
Campbell, M. L., Sheets, D., & Strong, P. (1999). Secondary health conditions among middleaged individuals with chronic physical disabilities: Implications for unmet needs for services . Assistive Technology Journal, 11, 205-213 .
9.
Charmaz, K. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
10.
Chipperfield, J. G., & Havens, B. (2001). Gender differences in the relationship between marital status transitions and life satisfaction in later life . Journal of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56, 176-186 .
11.
Coyle, P. K. (2000). Women’s issues. In J. S. Burks & K. P. Johnson (Eds.), Multiple sclerosis: Diagnosis, medical management and rehabilitation (pp. 505-514). New York: Demos Medical Publishing .
12.
Crewe, N., Athelstan, G. T., & Krumberger, J. (1979). Spinal cord injury: A comparison of preinjury and post-injury marriages . Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 252-256 .
13.
Crewe, N. M., & Krause, J. S. (1988). Marital relationships and spinal cord injury . Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 435-438 .
14.
Duquette, P., Pleines, J., Girard, M., Charest, L., Senecal-Quevillon, M., & Masse, C. (1992). The increased susceptibility of women to multiple sclerosis . Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 19, 466-471 .
15.
Haberman, M. R., Woods, N. F., & Packard, N. (1990). Demands of chronic illness: Reliability and validity assessment of a demands of illness inventory . Holistic Nursing Practice, 5, 25-35 .
16.
Hampton, N. Z., & Crystal, R. (1999). Gender differences in acceptance of disabilities among vocational rehabilitation consumers . Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 30, 16-21 .
17.
Helgeson, V. S. (1995). Masculinity, men’s roles, and coronary heart disease. In D. Sabo & D. Gordon (Eds.), Men’s health and illness (pp. 68-104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
18.
Holicky, R., & Charlifue, S. (1999). Aging with spinal cord injury: The impact of spousal support . Disability Rehabilitation, 21, 250-257 .
19.
Kaiser, H. (1970). A second generation little jiffy . Psychometrika, 35, 401-415 .
20.
Kaplan, H. S. (1990). Sex, intimacy and the aging process . Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 18, 185-205 .
21.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers . Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472-503 .
22.
Kurtzke, J. F. (1981). A proposal for a uniform minimal record of disability in multiple sclerosis . Acta Nerologica Scandinavica, 64(87), 110-129 .
23.
Li, L., & Moore, D. (1998). Acceptance of disability and its correlates . Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 13-25 .
24.
Li, L., & Moore, D. (2001). Disability and illicit drug use: An application of labeling theory . Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 1-21 .
25.
Linkowski, D., & Dunn, M. (1974). Self concept and acceptance of disability . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 17, 28-32 .
26.
Litwiller, S., Frohman, E., & Zimmerman, P. (1999). Multiple sclerosis and the urologist . Journal of Urology, 161, 743-757 .
27.
Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
28.
Morris, R. G., Woods, R. T., Davies, K. S., & Morris, L. W. (1991, May, 10). Gender differences in carers of dementia suffers . British Journal of Psychiatry, 158(Suppl.), 69-74 .
29.
Murray, J. E. (2000). Marital protection and marital selection: Evidence from a historical-prospective sample of American men . Demography, 37, 511-521 .
30.
Nosek, M. A., Howland, C., Rintala, D., Young, M., & Chanpong, M. (2001). National Study of Women with Physical Disabilities: Final report . Sexuality & Disability, 19, 5-45 .
31.
Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford .
32.
Parker, G. (1992). With this body. Philadelphia: Open University Press .
33.
Parker, G. (1993). Disability, caring and marriage: The experience of younger couples when a partner is disabled after marriage . British Journal of Social Work, 23, 565-580 .
34.
Phelps, J., Albo, M., Dunn, K., & Joseph, A. (2001). Spinal cord injury and sexuality in married or partneredmen: Activities, function, needs and predictors of sexual adjustment . Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 591-602 .
35.
Richardson, A., Adner, N., & Nordstrom, G. (2001). Persons with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Acceptance and coping ability . Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 758-763 .
36.
Rodgers, J., & Clader, P. (1990). Marital adjustment: A valuable resource for the emotional health of individuals with multi plesclerosis . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 25-32 .
37.
Rolland, J. (1994). Families, illness and disability. New York: Basic Books .
38.
Stevens, J. (1996). Intermediate statistics (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
39.
Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
40.
Stuifbergen, A. (1995). Health-promoting behaviors and quality of life among individuals with multiple sclerosis . Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 9, 31-50 .
41.
Stuifbergen, A., & Roberts, G. (1997). Health promotion practices of women with multiple sclerosis . Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, S3-S9 .
42.
Stuifbergen, A., Seraphine, A., & Roberts, G. (2000). An explanatorymodel of health promotion and quality of life in chronic disabling conditions . Nursing Research, 49, 122-129 .
43.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon .
44.
Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M. (2002). Body image and physical disability-personal perspectives . Social Science and Medicine, 54, 971-980 .
45.
Turner, H., & Turner, R. (1999). Gender, social status, and emotional reliance . Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 360-373 .
46.
Umberson, D. (1992). Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior . Social Science and Medicine, 34, 907-917 .
47.
Umberson, D., & Williams, K. (1999). Family status and mental health. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 225-253). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
48.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Social security: Disability programs lag in promoting return to work. Report to Congressional Committees. Available from www.gao.gov
49.
Walker, S., Sechrist, K., & Pender, N. (1995). Health Promoting Life style Profile II. Omaha: University of Nebraska .
50.
Ward, M., & Leigh, J. (1993). Marital status and the progression of functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis . Arthritis and Rheumatology, 36, 581-588 .
51.
Weitzenkamp, D., Gerhart, K., Charlifue, S., Whiteneck, G., & Gordana, S. (1997). Spouses of spinal cord injury survivors: The added impact of care giving . Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 822-827 .
