Challenges and Strategies of Instrument Translation

Abstract

The often-cited back translation procedure used for the translation of research instruments has not been consistently described in cross-cultural literature. Translation errors resulting in conceptually dissimilar instruments can compromise comparisons of cross-cultural health initiatives. This report describes a five-step translation procedure and equivalence and reliability testing process used to develop the High School Questionnaire: Profile of Experiences (HSQ) in Mandarin. Each step of the translation process provided additional information and detected discrepancies between the English and Mandarin versions of the HSQ. Issues related to grammatical translation, cultural usage and experience, syntax, and concept interpretation were exposed by the translation process. The procedures used in this 18-month study were rigorous enough to create an instrument that was both linguistically appropriate and culturally relevant.

Keywords

instrument translation translation equivalence back translation adolescent health Chinese

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.

Eggert, L. L. , Herting, J. R. ,& Thompson, E. A. (1994). The High School Questionnaire: Profile of life experiences. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Eggert, L. L. , Herting, J. R. ,& Thompson, E. A. (1996). The Drug Involvement Scale for Adolescents (DISA). Journal of Drug Education, 26(2), 101-130.

Goulet, C. , Polomeno, V. , Laizner, A. M. , Marcil, I. , & Lang, A. (2003). Translation and validation of a French version of Brown's support behaviors inventory in perinatal health. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 561-580.

Jones, P. S. , Lee, J. W. , Phillips, L. R. , Zhang, X. E. , & Jaceldo, K. B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 50, 300-304.

Kim, M. T. ,& Han, H. R. (2004). Cultural considerations in research instrument development. In M. Frank-Stromborg & S. J. Olsen (Eds.), Instruments for clinical health care research(3rd ed., pp. 73-81). Boston: Jones & Bartlett.

Maneesriwongul, W. , & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: A methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 175-186.

Marin, G. , & Marin, B. V. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Munet-Vilaro, F. , & Egan, M. (1990). Reliability issues of the family environment scale for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 39, 244-247.

10.

Philips, L. R. , de Hernandez, L. L. ,& de Ardon, E. T. (1994). Focus on psychometrics: Steps for achieving cultural equivalence. Research in Nursing and Health, 17, 149-154.

11.

Sperber, A. D. , Devellis, R. F. ,& Boehlecke, B. (1994). Cross-cultural translation: Methodology and validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 501-524.

12.

Streiner, D. L. , & Norman, G. R. (1995). With measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

13.

Thompson, E. A. , Moody, K. , & Eggert, L. L. (1994). Discriminating suicide ideation among high-risk youth. Journal of School Health, 64, 361-367.

14.

Varricchio, C. G. (2004). Measuring issues concerning linguistic translation. In M. Frank-Stromborg & S. J. Olsen (Eds.), Instruments for clinical health care research(3rd ed., pp. 56-64). Boston: Jones & Bartlett.

15.

Wang, W. L. (2000). Family and personal factors influencing adolescent suicide risk behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

16.

Yu, D. F. , Lee, D. T. , & Woo, J. (2004). Issues and challenges of instrument translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26, 307-320.