Structural Equation Modeling of Disability in Women with Fibromyalgia or Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Structural equation modeling (SEM), a popular statistical technique for analysis of multivariate data in the social sciences, is increasingly being used in the behavioral and clinical sciences. SEM is appropriate for posing complex models that evaluate the direct and indirect influence of several variables on one or more outcome variables. A biosocial model of disability, the Disablement Process Model, lends itself to evaluation by SEM. Using SEM, this study examined predictors of disability (Age, Education, Duration of Illness, and Economic Adequacy Functional Limitations, Depressive Symptoms, and Social Support) separately in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) and women with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and compared the respective models across groups. Data were analyzed with Analysis of Moment Structures (Amos) 7.0. Problems identified in initial confirmatory model testing included collateral correlated errors, a negative error variance, and poor performance of the disability indicators. After specifying well-fitting confirmatory models for each group, a structural model for the larger FMS group was estimated. Model refinement resulted in the reversal of the path between Depressive Symptoms and Social Support. Further model revisions were based on comparative fit statistics and theoretical logic. The structural model developed from the FMS sample required minimal changes to fit the MS sample. The multisample model explained greater variance in disability in women with FMS than in women with MS. Social support and depressive symptoms mediated the effect of functional limitations on disability. Interventions that target modifiable characteristics, such as depression and social support, may improve outcomes such as disability.

Keywords

structural equation modeling disability fibromyalgia multiple sclerosis depression social support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J.C. , & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin , 103, 411-423.

Andresen, E.M. , Malmgren, J.A. , Carter, W.B. , & Patrick, D.L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10, 77-84.

Arbuckle, J. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation .

Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461-483.

Burckhardt, C. , Clark, S. , & Bennett, R. (1991). The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: Development and validation. Journal of Rheumatology, 18, 728-733.

Femia, E.E. , Zarit, S.H. , & Johansson, B. (2001). The disablement process in very late life: A study of the oldest-old in Sweden. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B, P12-P23.

Harrison, A.L. (2002). The influence of pathology, pain, and coping on function among older women with knee osteoarthritis. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(08), 9A.

Isaksson, A.K. , Ahlström, G. , & Gunnarsson, L.G. (2005). Quality of life and impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 76, 64-69.

Jette, A.M. , Manago, D. , Medved, E. , Nickerson, A. , Warzycha, T. , & Bourgeois, M.C. (1997). The disablement process in patients with pulmonary disease. Physical Therapy, 77, 385-394.

10.

Keith, T.Z. (2005). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson Education.

11.

Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York : Guilford.

12.

Kurtzke, J.F. (1981). A proposal for a uniform minimal record of disability in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 64(Suppl. 87), 110-129.

13.

Lawrence, R.H. , & Jette, A.M. (1996). Disentangling the disablement process. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 51B, S173-S182.

14.

Mannerkorpi, K. , Svantesson, U. , & Broberg, C. (2006). Relationships between performance-based tests and patients' ratings of activity limitations, self-efficacy, and pain in fibromyalgia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 87, 259-264.

15.

McDonald, R.P. , & Ho, M.R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.

16.

McNeil, J.M. , & Binette, J. (2001). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50, 120-125.

17.

Mease, P. (2005). Fibromyalgia syndrome: Review of clinical presentation, pathogenesis, outcome measures, and treatment. Journal of Rheumatology, 32(Suppl. 75), 6-21.

18.

Musil, C.M. , Jones, S.L. , & Warner, C.D. (1998). Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 21, 271-281.

19.

Nagi, S.Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309-327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

20.

Peek, K.M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and rehabilitation research. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 79, 301-309.

21.

Pérès, K. , Verret, C. , Alioum, A. , & Barberger-Gateau, P. (2005). The disablement process: Factors associated with progression of disability and recovery in French elderly people. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 263-276.

22.

Porell, F.W. , & Miltiades, H.B. (2001). Access to care and functional status among Medicare beneficiaries. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological and Social Sciences, 56, S69-S83.

23.

Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.

24.

SPSS for Windows, Rel. 15.0. 2006. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

25.

Stuifbergen, A.K. , Becker, H. , Blozis, S. , Timmerman, G. , & Kullberg, V. (2003). A randomized clinical trial of a wellness intervention for women with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 467-476.

26.

Stuifbergen, A.K. , Harrison, T.C. , Becker, H. , & Carter, P. (2004). Adaptation of a wellness intervention for women with chronic disabling conditions. Journal of Holistic Nursing , 22, 12-31.

27.

van Genderen, F.R. , van Meeteren, N.L. , Heijnen, L. , van den Berg, H.M. , & Helders, P.J. (2005). The use of a disability model in haemophilia research . Haemophilia: The Official Journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 11, 472-480.

28.

van Gool, C.H. , Kempen, G.I.J.M. , Penninx, B.W.J.H. , Deeg, D.J.H. , Beekman, A.T.F. , & van Eijk, J. Th. M. (2005). Impact of depression on disablement in late middle aged and older persons: Results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 25-36.

29.

Verbrugge, L.M. , & Jette, A.M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1-14.

30.

Ware, J. , & Sherbourne, C. (1992). The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF36). Medical Care, 30, 473-483.

31.

Weinert, C. (1987). A social support measure: PRQ85. Nursing Research, 36, 273-277.

32.

Weinert, C. (2003). Measuring social support: PRQ2000. In O. Strickland & C. DiIorio (Eds.), Measurement of nursing outcomes: Vol. 3. Self care and coping (pp. 161-172). New York: Springer.

33.

Weinert, C. , & Brandt, P.A. (1987). Measuring social support with the personal resource questionnaire. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 9, 589-602.

34.

Wingerchuk, D.M. , Noseworthy, J.H. , & Weishenker, B.G. (1997). Clinical outcome measures and rating scales in multiple sclerosis trials. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 72, 1070-1079.