Research with the largest impact on practice and science is often conducted by teams with diverse substantive, clinical, and methodological expertise. Team and interdisciplinary research has created authorship groups with varied expertise and expectations. Co-authorship among team members presents many opportunities and challenges. Intentional planning, clear expectations, sensitivity to differing disciplinary perspectives, attention to power differentials, effective communication, timelines, attention to published guidelines, and documentation of progress will contribute to successful co-authorship. Both novice and seasoned authors will find the strategies identified by the Western Journal of Nursing Research Editorial Board useful for building positive co-authorship experiences.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE— Raising the quality of academic journals. Available from http://publicationethics.org/
4.
Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy of Sciences. (1995). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5.
FrostR. (2008). Early selected poems. Claremont, CA: Coyote Canyon Press.
6.
GibaldiJ. (1998). MLA style manual and guide to scholarly publishing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
The GUSTO Investigators. (1993). An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 673-682. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309023291001
9.
HoldenC. (2006). Schatten: Pitt panel finds “misbehavior” but not misconduct. Science, 311, 928. doi:10.1126/science.311.5763.928
10.
IlakovacV.FisterK.MarusicM.MarusicA. (2007). Reliability of disclosure forms of authors’ contributions. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176, 41-46. doi:10.1503/cmaj.060687
11.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2008). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/archives/2008_urm.pdf
NylennaM.AndersenD.DahlquistG.SarvasM.AakvaagA. (1999). Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. The Lancet, 354, 57-61. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07133-5
15.
RennieD.YankV.EmanuelL. (1997). When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 579-585. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041
16.
RossJ. S.HillK. P.EgilmanD. S.KrumholzH. M. (2008). Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 1800-1812. doi:10.1001/jama.299.15.1800
