The aim of this study was to explore the effect of work engagement, as an intermediary variable, on the relationship between self-efficacy, and job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment as individual indicators of quality of working life (QWL). A cross-sectional correlational design was utilized assessing a convenience sample of 321 nursing staff. All participants were employed in public hospitals and had more than five months of professional experience in the same hospital. Mediation analysis was performed using path analysis and bootstrapping confidence intervals (percentile-corrected). Work engagement partially mediated the relation between self-efficacy and job satisfaction, and fully mediated the relation between self-efficacy and affective organizational commitment. Self-efficacy seems to be an important predictor of QWL in nursing staff, although its effect is partially mediated (e.g., job satisfaction) or fully mediated (e.g., affective commitment) by work engagement.
AikenL. H.SermeusW.Van den HeedeK.SloaneD. M.BusseR.McKeeM.. . . Kutney-LeeA. (2012). Patients safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: Cross sectional survey of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. British Medical Journal, 344, e1717.
2.
AikenL. H.SloaneD. M.BruyneelL.Van den HeedeK.SermeusW. (2013). Nurses’ reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009
3.
BaikD.ZierlerB. (2019). RN job satisfaction and retention after an interprofessional team intervention. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945918770815
4.
BakkerA. B.LeiterM. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
BrunettoY.XerriM.ShribergA.Farr-WhartonR.ShacklockK.NewmanS.DiengerJ. (2013). The impact of workplace relationships on engagement, well-being, commitment and turnover for nurses in Australia and the USA. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(12), 2786–2799. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12165
7.
CicoliniG.ComparciniD.SimonettiV. (2014). Workplace empowerment and nurses’ job satisfaction: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(7), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12028
8.
CummingsG.WorleyC. G. (1997). Organization development and change. Nashville, TN: South-Western College Publishing.
9.
de FrutosB.RuizM. A.San MartínR. (1998). Análisis factorial confirmatorio de las dimensiones del compromiso con la organización [Confimatory Factor Analysis on the Dimensions of Organizational Commitment]. Psicológica, 19, 345–366.
10.
De SimoneS.PlantaA.CicottoG. (2018). The role of job satisfaction, work engagement, self-efficacy and agentic capacities on nurses’ turnover intention and patient satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.004
11.
García-IzquierdoM.SáezM. C.LlorB. (2000). Burnout, job satisfaction ad well-being in a sample of Spanish mental health care workers. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 215–228.
12.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). New York: Psychology Press.
13.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
14.
KaramiA.FarokhzadianJ.ForoughameriG. (2017). Nurses’ professional competency and organizational commitment: Is it important for human resource management?PLOS One, 12(11), e0187863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187863
15.
MacheS.VitzthumK.KlappB. F.DanzerG. (2014). Surgeons’ work engagement: Influencing factors and relations to job and life satisfaction. The Surgeon, 12(4), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.015
16.
MeliáJ. L.PeiróJ. M. (1989). El cuestionario de satisfacción S10/12: Estructura factorial, fiabilidad y validez [The S10/12 Job Satisfaction Questionnaire: Factorial structure, reliability, and validity]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 4(11), 179–187.
17.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithJ. C. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.
18.
MoodieS.DolanS. L.BurkeR. (2014). Exploring the causes, symptoms and health consequences of joint and inverse states of work engagement and burnout. Management Research, 12(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-05-2013-0506
19.
NowrouziB.GiddensE.GoharB.SchoenenbergerS.ChristineM.CasoleJ. (2016). The quality of work life of registered nurses in Canada and the United States: a comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 22(4), 341–356.
20.
PengJ.JiangX.ZhangJ.XiaoR.SongY.FengX.. . . MiaoD. (2013). The impact of psychological capital in job burnout of Chinese nurses: The mediator role of organizational commitment. PLoS One, 8(12), e84193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084193
21.
RuillerC.Van Der HeijdenB. (2016). Socio-emotional support in French hospitals: Effects on French nurses’ and nurse aides’ affective commitment. Applied Nursing Research, 29, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2015.06.006
22.
SantosA.ChambelM. J.CastanheiraF. (2016). Relational job characteristics and nurses’ affective organizational commitment: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72, 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12834
23.
SchaufeliW. B. (2017). Applying the Job Demands-Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics, 46, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
24.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
25.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
26.
ScholzU.GutiérrezB.SudS.SchwarzerR. (2002). Is general self-efficacy an universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
27.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
28.
ShahpouriS.NamdariK.AhmadA. (2016). Mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between job resources and personal resources with turnover intention among female nurses. Applied Nursing Research, 30, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2015.10.008
29.
Van BogaertP.WoutersK.WillemsR.MondelaersM.ClarkeS. (2013). Work engagement supports nurse workplace stablity and quality of care: Nursing team-level analysis in psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20, 679–686.
30.
VenturaM.SalanovaM.LlorensS. (2015). Professional self-efficacy as a predictor of burnout and engagement: The role of challenge and hindrance demands. The Journal of Psychology, 149(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.876380
31.
ZigarmiD.NimonK.HousonD.WittD.DiehlJ. (2011). A preliminary field test of an employee work passion model. Human Resource Development Quaterly, 22(2), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20076
