Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation Suppresses Apoptotic Signaling in Rat Spiral Ganglion Neurons after Deafening in Vivo

Abstract

Objective

To establish the intracellular consequences of electrical stimulation to spiral ganglion neurons after deafferentation. Here we use a rat model to determine the effect of both low and high pulse rate acute electrical stimulation on activation of the proapoptotic transcription factor Jun in deafferented spiral ganglion neurons in vivo.

Study Design

Experimental animal study.

Setting

Hearing research laboratories of the University of Iowa Departments of Biology and Otolaryngology.

Methods

A single electrode was implanted through the round window of kanamycin-deafened rats at either postnatal day 32 (P32, n = 24) or P60 (n = 22) for 4 hours of stimulation (monopolar, biphasic pulses, amplitude twice electrically evoked auditory brainstem response [eABR] threshold) at either 100 or 5000 Hz. Jun phosphorylation was assayed by immunofluorescence to quantitatively assess the effect of electrical stimulation on proapoptotic signaling.

Results

Jun phosphorylation was reliably suppressed by 100 Hz stimuli in deafened cochleae of P32 but not P60 rats. This effect was not significant in the basal cochlear turns. Stimulation frequency may be consequential: 100 Hz was significantly more effective than was 5 kHz stimulation in suppressing phospho-Jun.

Conclusions

Suppression of Jun phosphorylation occurs in deafferented spiral ganglion neurons after only 4 hours of electrical stimulation. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that electrical stimulation can decrease spiral ganglion neuron death after deafferentation.

Keywords

spiral ganglion neuron c-Jun phosphorylation deafness cochlear implants apoptosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bichler

Spoendlin

Rauchegger

. Degeneration of cochlear neurons after amikacin intoxication in the rat. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1983;237:201-208.

Lenoir

Daudet

Humbert

. Morphological and molecular changes in the inner hair cell region of the rat cochlea after amikacin treatment. J Neurocytol. 1999;28:925-937.

Webster

. Spiral ganglion neuron loss following organ of Corti loss: a quantitative study. Brain Res. 1981;212:17-30.

Leake

Hradek

. Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear Res. 1988;33:11-33.

Nadol

Jr Young

Glynn

. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989;98:411-416.

Nadol

Jr . Degeneration of cochlear neurons as seen in the spiral ganglion of man. Hear Res. 1990;49:141-154.

Fayad

Linthicum

Jr . Multichannel cochlear implants; relation of histopathology to performance. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1310-1320.

Pfingst

Bowling

Colesa

. Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing. Hear Res. 2011;281:65-73.

Kawano

Seldon

Clark

. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol. 1998;118:313-326.

10.

Khan

Whiten

Nadol

Jr . Histopathology of human cochlear implants: correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures. Hear Res. 2005;205:83-92.

11.

Goldwyn

Bierer

. Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration. Hear Res. 2010;268:93-104.

12.

Hegarty

Kay

Green

. Trophic support of cultured spiral ganglion neurons by depolarization exceeds and is additive with that by neurotrophins or cAMP and requires elevation of [Ca2+]i within a set range. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1959-1970.

13.

Chen

Limb

Ryugo

. The effect of cochlear-implant-mediated electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cells in congenitally deaf white cats. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010;11:587-603.

14.

Leake

Hradek

Snyder

. Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness. J Comp Neurol. 1999;412:543-562.

15.

Leake

Stakhovskaya

Hradek

. Factors influencing neurotrophic effects of electrical stimulation in the deafened developing auditory system. Hear Res. 2008;242:86-99.

16.

Araki

Kawano

Seldon

. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion neuron survival and size in deafened kittens. Laryngoscope. 1998:108:687-695.

17.

Mitchell

Miller

Finger

. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig. Hear Res. 1997;105:30-43.

18.

Shepherd

Coco

Epp

. Chronic depolarization enhances the trophic effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rescuing auditory neurons following a sensorineural hearing loss. J Comp Neurol. 2005;486:145-158.

19.

Ham

Eilers

Whitfield

. c-Jun and the transcriptional control of neuronal apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;60:1015-1021.

20.

Eilers

Whitfield

Babij

. Role of the Jun kinase pathway in the regulation of c-Jun expression and apoptosis in sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. 1998;18:1713-1724.

21.

Alam

Robinson

Huang

. Prosurvival and proapoptotic intracellular signaling in rat spiral ganglion neurons in vivo after the loss of hair cells. J Comp Neurol. 2007;503:832-852.

22.

Onejeme

Khan

. Morphologic study of effects of kanamycin on the developing cochlea of the rat. Teratology. 1984;29:57-71.

23.

Judkins

. Surgical anatomy of the rat middle ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117:438-447.

24.

Zha

Bishop

Hansen

. BDNF synthesis in spiral ganglion neurons is constitutive and CREB-dependent. Hear Res. 2001;156:53-68.

25.

Abbas

Miller

. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment. Hear Res. 2003;185:77-89.

26.

Whitlon

Szakaly

Greiner

. Cryoembedding and sectioning of cochleas for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Brain Res Protocols. 2001;6:159-166.

27.

Choung

Taura

Pak

. Generation of highly-reactive oxygen species is closely related to hair cell damage in rat organ of Corti treated with gentamicin. Neuroscience. 2009;161:214-226.

28.

Davis

. Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell. 2000;103:239-252.

29.

Ham

Babij

Whitfield

. A c-Jun dominant negative mutant protects sympathetic neurons against programmed cell death. Neuron. 1995;14:927-939.

30.

Bogoyevitch

Boehm

Oakley

. Targeting the JNK MAPK cascade for inhibition: basic science and therapeutic potential. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1697:89-101.

31.

Bruckner

Tammariello

Kuan

. JNK3 contributes to c-Jun activation and apoptosis but not oxidative stress in nerve growth factor-deprived sympathetic neurons. J Neurochem. 2001;78:298-303.

32.

Jeong

Kim

Hur

. Gentamicin-induced spiral ganglion cell death: apoptosis mediated by ROS and the JNK signaling pathway. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:670-678.

33.

Leake

PA.

Rebscher

. Anatomical considerations and long-term effects of electrical stimulation. In: Zeng

F-G

Popper

Fay

eds. Auditory Prostheses, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. New York: Springer Verlag; 2004.

34.

Miller

. Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals. Hear Res. 2001;151:1-14.

35.

Sly

Heffer

White

. Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26:510-522.

36.

Wise

Atkinson

. The effect of deafness duration on neurotrophin gene therapy for spiral ganglion neuron protection. Hear Res. 2011;278:69-76.

37.

Fallon

Shepherd

Brown

. Effects of neonatal partial deafness and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on auditory and electrical response characteristics in primary auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2009;257:93-105.

38.

Green

Julyan

Hastings

. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness. Hear Res. 2005;205:184-192.

39.

Blamey

Arndt

Bergeron

. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 1996;1:293-306.

40.

Parkins

Webster

. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration? Hear Res. 1999;133:27-39.

41.

Rubinstein

. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12:444-448.

42.

Middlebrooks

Bierer

Snyder

. Cochlear implants: the view from the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:488-493.

43.

Rubinstein

Hong

. Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2003;191:14-19.

44.

Heffer

Sly

Fallon

. Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104:3124-3135.

45.

Miller

Altschuler

. Effectiveness of different electrical stimulation conditions in preservation of spiral ganglion neurons following deafness. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:57-60.

46.

Huang

Shepherd

. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area. Hear Res. 2000;146:57-71.

47.

Leake

Stakhovskaya

Hradek

. Factors influencing neurotrophic effects of electrical stimulation in the deafened developing auditory system. Hear Res. 2008;242:86-99.

48.

Shepherd

Coco

Epp

. Chronic depolarization enhances the trophic effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rescuing auditory neurons following a sensorineural hearing loss. J Comp Neurol. 2005;486:145-158.