Abstract
Objective
To implement a quality improvement project addressing the knowledge gap in the otolaryngology resident and fellow scientific peer review process.
Methods
The creation of the Resident Reviewer Development Program, cohort 1 outcomes, and subsequent lessons learned from the inaugural class are outlined using the plan-do-study-act model. Interested otolaryngology residents were paired with seasoned reviewers and conducted a minimum of 3 mentored peer reviews followed by an independent review test if competency was determined.
Results
Twenty-five residents (postgraduate years [PGYs] 2-5) were actively enrolled in cohort 1. At 24 months, 18 (72%) graduated, 6 remained actively enrolled, and 1 did not successfully complete the program. The median number of practice reviews prior to testing was 3 (range, 3-6). The median independent review score was 83 (overall journal mean = 78). Cohort 1 graduates continued on to review 130 articles with a mean score of 85. Five (28%) graduates achieved Star Reviewer status.
Discussion
The inaugural cohort demonstrated that the PGY-3 and PGY-4 class is ideal for enrollment given that completion of the program could take up to 24 months. Three mentored reviews were identified as the ideal minimum requirement for education. The accelerated achievement of Star Reviewer status (28%) and mean postgraduation score of 85 demonstrate successful and sustainable outcome measures.
Implications for Practice
With appropriate mentorship and administrative support, scientific peer review can be formally incorporated into an educational program. Lessons learned during the educational program are sustained long term as demonstrated by review scores and Star Reviewer status.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
