To synthesize published literature describing the severity of body image disturbance (BID) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) over time, its psychosocial and functional associations, and treatment strategies as assessed by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Data Source
PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
Review Methods
A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed to identify studies of BID in patients with HNC using psychometrically validated PROMs to assess (1) severity of BID over time, (2) psychosocial and functional associations, and (3) management strategies.
Results
A total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria. BID was assessed via 10 different PROMs, none of which were HNC-specific measures of BID. Two of 2 longitudinal studies (100%) reported that BID improved from pretreatment to posttreatment, and 2 of 3 longitudinal studies (67%) showed that the severity of BID decreased over time as survivors got further out from treatment. Seven of 17 studies (41%) described negative functional and psychosocial associations with BID, although study methodology limited conclusions about cause and effect. None of the studies assessing interventions to manage BID (0/2, 0%) demonstrated an improvement in BID relative to control.
Conclusion
BID in patients with HNC has negative functional and psychosocial associations and lacks evidence-based treatment. Research is limited by the lack of an HNC-specific BID PROM. Further research should address knowledge gaps related to the lack of an HNC-specific BID PROM, longitudinal course of BID in patients with HNC, confusion with regards to risk factors and outcomes, and lack of prevention and treatment strategies.
ParkinDMBrayFFerlayJPisaniP.Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.
2.
JansenFSnyderCFLeemansCRVerdonck–de LeeuwIM.Identifying cutoff scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck cancer–specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 representing unmet supportive care needs in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2016;38(suppl 1):E1493-E1500.
3.
MurphyBARidnerSWellsNDietrichM.Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol. 2007;62:251-267.
4.
De BoerMFMcCormickLKPruynJFRyckmanRMvan den BorneBW.Physical and psychosocial correlates of head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;120:427-436.
5.
FingeretMCYuanYUrbauerDWestonJNipomnickSWeberR.The nature and extent of body image concerns among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology. 2012;21:836-844.
6.
FingeretMCTeoIGoettschK.Body image: a critical psychosocial issue for patients with head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2015;17:422.
7.
Verdonck-de LeeuwIMvan BleekWLeemansCRde BreeR.Employment and return to work in head and neck cancer survivors. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:56-60.
8.
RhotenBAMurphyBRidnerSH.Body image in patients with head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:753-760.
9.
KatzMRIrishJCDevinsGMRodinGMGullanePJ.Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck. 2003;25:103-112.
10.
MillsoppLBrandomLHumphrisGLoweDStatCRogersS.Facial appearance after operations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of casenotes and patient-completed questionnaire. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44:358-363.
11.
HuTCookeMMcCarthyA.A qualitative study of the experience of oral cancer among Taiwanese men. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15:326-333.
12.
CohenEEWLaMonteSJErbNLet al. American Cancer Society head and neck cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:203-239.
13.
KatzMRIrishJCDevinsGMRodinGMGullanePJ.Reliability and validity of an observer-rated disfigurement scale for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2000;22:132-141.
14.
DropkinMJMalgadyRGScottDWOberstMTStrongEW.Scaling of disfigurement and dysfunction in postoperative head and neck patients. Head Neck Surg. 1983;6:559-570.
15.
GotayCCLipscombJSnyderCF.Reflections on findings of the cancer outcomes measurement working group: moving to the next phase. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1568-1574.
16.
HopwoodP.The assessment of body image in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29:276-281.
17.
HopwoodPP.A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:189-197.
18.
BaxterNNGoodwinPJMcLeodRSDionRDevinsGBombardierC.Reliability and validity of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire. Breast J. 2006;12:221-232.
19.
DaltonEJRasmussenVNClassenCCet al. PMC4856437; Sexual Adjustment and Body Image Scale (SABIS): a new measure for breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2009;15:287-290.
20.
TeoIFronczykKMGuindaniMet al. Salient body image concerns of patients with cancer undergoing head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2016;38:1035-1042.
21.
ChenSCYuPJHongMYet al. Communication dysfunction, body image, and symptom severity in postoperative head and neck cancer patients: factors associated with the amount of speaking after treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2375-2382.
22.
ChenSCHuangBSLinCYet al. Psychosocial effects of a skin camouflage program in female survivors with head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2017;26:1376-1383.
23.
ChenSCHuangCYHuangBSet al. Factors associated with healthcare professional’s rating of disfigurement and self-perceived body image in female patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;27:1-7.
24.
HungTLinCChiYet al. Body image in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: the impact of surgical procedures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:165.
25.
BealBTWhiteEKBeheraAKet al. Patients’ body image improves after Mohs micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma head and neck skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44:1380-1388.
26.
BranchLFeuzCMcQuestionM.An investigation into body image concerns in the head and neck cancer population receiving radiation or chemoradiation using the body image scale: a pilot study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017;48:159-165.
27.
DjanRPeningtonA.A systematic review of questionnaires to measure the impact of appearance on quality of life for head and neck cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:647-659.
28.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:9, w64.
29.
ShermanKAPrzezdzieckiAAlcorsoJet al. Reducing body image–related distress in women with breast cancer using a structured online writing exercise: results from the My Changed Body randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1930-1940.
CashTF.Measuring ‘negative body image’: validation of the body image disturbance questionnaire in a nonclinical population. Body Image. 2004;1:363-372.
34.
CashTFT. The impact of body image experiences: development of the body image quality of life inventory. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;31:455-460.
35.
BealBTWhiteEKBeheraAKet al. A novel, disease-specific self-report instrument to measure body image concerns in patients with head and neck skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44:17-24.
36.
SladePD.Development and preliminary validation of the Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS). Psychol Health. 1990;4:213-220.
37.
LundgrenJDJ. Fear of negative appearance evaluation: development and evaluation of a new construct for risk factor work in the field of eating disorders. Eating Behav. 2004;5:75-84.
38.
HeinbergLJL. Assessing body image in patients with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): validation of the adapted satisfaction with appearance scale. Body Image. 2007;4:79-86.
39.
ChenSHuangBLinCet al. Psychosocial effects of a skin camouflage program in female survivors with head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2017;26:1376-1383.
40.
ClarkeSANewellRThompsonAHarcourtDLindenmeyerA.Appearance concerns and psychosocial adjustment following head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study and nine-month follow-up. Psychol Health Med. 2014;19:505-518.
41.
RhotenBADengJDietrichMSMurphyBRidnerSH.Body image and depressive symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer: an important relationship. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:3053-3060.
42.
HuangSLiuHE.Effectiveness of cosmetic rehabilitation on the body image of oral cancer patients in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:981-986.
43.
FingeretMCHutchesonKAJensenKYuanYUrbauerDLewinJS.Associations among speech, eating, and body image concerns for surgical patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2013;35:354-360.
44.
FingeretMCVidrineDJReeceGPGillenwaterAMGritzER.Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer. Head Neck. 2010;32:301-309.
45.
LiuHE.Changes of satisfaction with appearance and working status for head and neck tumour patients. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:1930-1938.
46.
Osazuwa-PetersNSimpsonMCZhaoLet al. Suicide risk among cancer survivors: head and neck versus other cancers. Cancer. 2018;124:4072-4079.
47.
LydiattWMBessetteDSchmidKKSaylesHBurkeWJ.Prevention of depression with escitalopram in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:678-686.
48.
FingeretMCTeoIEpnerDE.Managing body image difficulties of adult cancer patients: lessons from available research. Cancer. 2014;120:633-641.
49.
JarryJLBerardiK.Characteristics and effectiveness of stand-alone body image treatments: a review of the empirical literature. Body Image. 2004;1:319-333.
50.
FadaeiSJanighorbanMMehrabiTAhmadiSAMokaryanFGukizadeA.Effects of cognitive behavioral counseling on body image following mastectomy. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16:1047-1054.
51.
LeeKBacchettiPSimI.Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e191.
52.
CarrTMossTHarrisD.The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:285-298.
53.
DengJMurphyBADietrichMSet al. Impact of secondary lymphedema after head and neck cancer treatment on symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Head Neck. 2013;35:1026-1035.
54.
KatreCJohnsonIAHumphrisGMLoweDRogersSN.Assessment of problems with appearance, following surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer using the University of Washington appearance domain and the Derriford appearance scale. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:927-934.
55.
MoschopoulouEHutchisonIBhuiKKorszunA.Post-traumatic stress in head and neck cancer survivors and their partners. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26:3003-3011.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
