Cochlear implant depth of insertion affects audiologic outcomes and can be measured in adults using plain films obtained in the “cochlear view.” The objective of this study was to assess interrater and intrarater reliability of measuring depth of insertion using cochlear view radiography.
Study Design
Prospective, observational.
Setting
Tertiary referral pediatric hospital.
Subjects and Methods
Patients aged 11 months to 20 years (median, 4 years; interquartile range [IQR], 1-8 years) undergoing cochlear implantation at our institution were studied over 1 year. Children underwent cochlear view imaging on postoperative day 1. Films were deidentified and 1 image per ear was selected. Two cochlear implant surgeons and 2 radiologists evaluated each image and determined angular depth of insertion. Images were re-reviewed 6 weeks later by all raters. Inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results
Fifty-seven ears were imaged from 42 children. Forty-nine ears (86%) had successful cochlear view x-rays. Median angular depth of insertion was 381° (minimum, 272°; maximum, 450°; IQR, 360°-395°) during the first round of measurement. Measurements of the same images reviewed 6 weeks later showed median depth of insertion of 382° (minimum, 272°; maximum, 449°; IQR, 360°-397°). Interrater and intrarater reliability ICCs ranged between 0.81 and 0.96, indicating excellent reliability.
Conclusions
Postoperative cochlear view radiography is a reliable tool for measurement of cochlear implant depth of insertion in infants and children. Further studies are needed to determine reliability of intraoperatively obtained cochlear view radiographs in this population.
PetersonNRPisoniDBMiyamotoRT.Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: review and assessment of the literature. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(2):237-250.
2.
NiparkoJKTobeyEAThalDJ, et al. Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA. 2010;303(15):1498-1506.
3.
O’DonoghueGMNikolopoulosTPArchboldSM.Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet. 2000;356(9228):466-468.
4.
WuDWoodsonEWMasurJ, et al. Pediatric cochlear implantation: role of language, income, and ethnicity. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(5):721-724.
5.
HoltRFSvirskyMA.An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?Ear Hear. 2008;29(4):492-511.
6.
HornDLPisoniDBSandersM, et al. Behavioral assessment of prelingually deaf children before cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1603-1611.
7.
SvrakicMFriedmannDRBermanPM, et al. Measurement of cochlear implant electrode position from intraoperative post-insertion skull radiographs: a validation study. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(9):1486-1491.
8.
WannaGBNobleJHCarlsonML, et al. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(suppl 6):S1-S7.
9.
AschendorffAKromeierJKlenznerT, et al. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2)(suppl):75s-79s.
10.
FirsztJBHoldenLKSkinnerMW, et al. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear. 2004;25(4):375-387.
11.
GantzBJDunnCOlesonJ, et al. Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: final outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(4):962-973.
12.
LandsbergerDMSvrakicMRolandJTJr, et al. The relationship between insertion angles, default frequency allocations, and spiral ganglion place pitch in cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2015;36(5):e207-e213.
13.
BuchmanCADillonMTKingER, et al. Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: a prospective randomized trial. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(10):1773-1779.
14.
BaşkentDShannonRV.Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117(3):1405-1416.
15.
SkinnerMWKettenDRHoldenLK, et al. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002;3(3):332-350.
DormanMFSpahrTGiffordR, et al. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;8(2):234-240.
18.
ZawawiFCushingSLJamesAL, et al. Extrusion of straight cochlear implant electrodes may be diminished by proximal fixation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;116:164-167.
19.
MittmannPRademacherGMutzeS, et al. Electrode migration in patients with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(6):349-353.
20.
XuJXuSACohenLT, et al. Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol. 2000;21(1):49-56.
21.
VerbistBMSkinnerMWCohenLT, et al. Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(5):722-730.
22.
MarshMAXuJBlameyPJ, et al. Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. Am J Otol. 1993;14(4):386-391.
23.
CohenLTXuJXuSA, et al. Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am J Otol. 1996;17(6):859-865.
24.
LeeJNadolJBJr.EddingtonDK.Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study. Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(5):323-331.
25.
De SetaDManciniPRussoFY, et al. 3D curved multiplanar cone beam CT reconstruction for intracochlear position assessment of straight electrodes array: a temporal bone and clinical study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016;36(6):499-505.
26.
GallantSFriedmannDRHagiwaraM, et al. Comparison of skull radiograph and computed tomography measurements of cochlear implant insertion angles. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(3):e298-e303.
27.
FernandesVWangYYeungR, et al. Effectiveness of skull x-ray to determine cochlear implant insertion depth. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;47(1):50.
28.
ToddNWBallTI.Interobserver agreement of coiling of Med-El cochlear implant: plain x-ray studies. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(3):271-274.
29.
HarrisPATaylorRMinorBL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
30.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeR, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381.
31.
LandisJRKochGG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.
32.
GoupellMJStoelbCKanA, et al. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133(4):2272-2287.
33.
KanAStoelbCLitovskyRY, et al. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134(4):2923-2936.
34.
SvirskyMAFitzgeraldMBSagiE, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135(4):354-363.
35.
StaisloffHELeeDHAronoffJM.Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation. Hear Res. 2016;337:59-64.
36.
AronoffJMPadillaMStelmachJ, et al. Clinically paired electrodes are often not perceived as pitch matched. Trends Hear. 2016;20. pii: 2331216516668302
37.
MachereyOCarlyonRP.Place-pitch manipulations with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;131(3):2225-2236.
38.
DirrFHempelJMKrauseE, et al. Value of routine plain x-ray position checks after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(9):1666-1669.
39.
CelikMOrhanKSOzturkE, et al. Impact of routine plain x-ray on postoperative management in cochlear implantation. J Int Adv Otol. 2018;14(3):365-369.
40.
KiljunenTTietäväinenAParviainenT, et al. Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland. Acta Radiologica. 2009;50(1):114-124.
41.
MazonakisMDamilakisJRaissakiM, et al. Radiation dose and cancer risk to children undergoing skull radiography. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(8):624-629.
42.
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332.
43.
McRackanTRRedaFARivasA, et al. Comparison of cochlear implant relevant anatomy in children versus adults. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(3):328-334.
