Abstract
Objective
To compare endoscopic myringoplasty using the cartilage-perichondrium complex as a graft (test group) with temporalis fascia microscopic myringoplasty (control group).
Study Design
A retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary Chinese hospital.
Methods
Data were collected on patients between 2017 and 2019. To balance the baseline characteristics between groups, we performed a propensity score–matched analysis, and 44 patients were included in each group. Hearing improvement and eardrum closure rates were compared, and risk factors affecting them were analyzed.
Results
In the control and test groups, 90.90% and 86.36% of patients had a mean air-bone gap ≤20 dB after the surgery, respectively (P = .843). The air conduction (AC) threshold gain at each frequency was similar in the 2 groups (P > .05). The closure rates were 95.45% and 93.18%, respectively (P = .645). The air-bone gap improved significantly after surgery, F(1, 61) = 6.729, P = .012. Age, group, middle ear mucosal status, and location of the perforation did not affect the change in air-bone gap or the drum closure rate (P > .05). However, there was an interaction between the change in air-bone gap and the size of the perforation, F(1, 61) = 11.067, P = 0001.
Conclusion
Endoscopic myringoplasty using a cartilage-perichondrium complex graft is comparable with traditional surgery. Age, location of the perforation, and middle ear mucosal status did not significantly affect the change in air-bone gap or the drum closure rate. A perforation size ≥50% was always associated with a better air-bone gap improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
