To use an automated speech-processing technology to identify patterns in sound environments and language output for deaf or hard-of-hearing infants and toddlers.
Study Design
Observational study based on a convenience sample.
Setting
Home observation conducted by tertiary children’s hospital.
Methods
The system analyzed 115 naturalistic recordings of 28 children <3.5 years old. Hearing ability was stratified into groups by access to sound. Outcomes were compared across hearing groups, and multivariable linear regression was used to test associations.
Results
There was a significant difference in age-adjusted child vocalizations (P = .042), conversational turns (P = .022), and language development scores (P = .05) between hearing groups but no significant difference in adult words (P = .11). Conversational turns were positively associated with each language development measure, while adult words were not. For each hour of electronic media, there were significant reductions in child vocalizations (β = −0.47; 95% CI, −0.71 to −0.19), conversational turns (β = −0.45; 95% CI, −0.65 to −0.22), and language development (β = −0.37; 95% CI, −0.61 to −0.15).
Conclusions
Conversational turn scores differ among hearing groups and are positively associated with language development outcomes. Electronic media is associated with reduced discernible adult speech, child vocalizations, conversational turns, and language development scores. This effect was larger in children who are deaf or hard of hearing as compared with other reports in typically hearing populations. These findings underscore the need to optimize early language environments and limit electronic noise exposure in children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
HartBRisleyTR. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. PaulH. Brookes Publishing Co; 1995.
2.
HoffE.The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Dev. 2003;74:1368-1378.
3.
HuttenlocherJHaightWBrykASeltzerMLyonsT.Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender. Dev Psychol. 1991;27:236-248.
4.
RoweML.Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. J Child Lang. 2008;35:185-205.
5.
LandrySHSmithKESwankPR.Responsive parenting: establishing early foundations for social, communication, and independent problem-solving skills. Dev Psychol. 2006;42:627-642.
6.
Yoshinaga-ItanoC.From screening to early identification and intervention: discovering predictors to successful outcomes for children with significant hearing loss. J Deaf Studies Deaf Ed. 2003;8:11-30.
7.
WatkinPMcCannDLawC, et al. Language ability in children with permanent hearing impairment: the influence of early management and family participation. Pediatrics. 2007;120:694-701.
8.
VohrBJodoin-KrauzykJTuckerRJohnsonMJTopolDAhlgrenM.Early language outcomes of early-identified infants with permanent hearing loss at 12 to 16 months of age. Pediatrics. 2008;122:535-544.
9.
ChingTYDillonHButtonL, et al. Age at intervention for permanent hearing loss and 5-year language outcomes. Pediatrics. 2017;140:4274.
10.
McDanielRPurdySC.Using the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system to investigate the language environment and outcomes of deaf children: a pilot study. NZ J Speech Lang Path. 2011;1:1-27.
11.
VanDamMAmbroseSEMoellerMP.Quantity of parental language in the home environments of hard-of-hearing 2-year-olds. J Deaf Studies Deaf Ed. 2012;17:402-420.
12.
AmbroseSEUnflat BerryLMWalkerEAHarrisonMOlesonJMoellerMP.Speech sound production in 2-year-olds who are hard of hearing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23:91-104.
13.
VanDamMOllerDKMoellerMP, et al. Automated vocal analysis of children with hearing loss and their typical and atypical peers. Ear Hear. 2015;36:e146.
14.
AmbroseSEVanDamMMoellerMP.Linguistic input, electronic media, and communication outcomes of toddlers with hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2014;35:139.
EilersREOllerDK.Infant vocalizations and the early diagnosis of severe hearing impairment. J Pediatr. 1994;124:199-203.
17.
GilkersonJRichardsJAWarrenSFOllerDKRussoRVohrB.Language experience in the second year of life and language outcomes in late childhood. Pediatrics. 2018;142(4):e20174276.
18.
ZimmermanFJGilkersonJYapanelU, et al. Teaching by listening: the importance of adult-child conversations to language development. Pediatrics. 2009;124:342-349.
19.
SuskindDLeffelKRMeehanP, et al. An exploratory study of “quantitative linguistic feedback” effect of LENA feedback on adult language production. Commun Disord Q. 2013;34:199-209.
20.
AragonMYoshinaga-ItanoC.Using Language ENvironment Analysis to improve outcomes for children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Semin Speech Lang. 2012;33:340-353.
21.
SuskindDLGrafENevinsME, et al. Project ASPIRE: spoken language intervention curriculum for parents of low-socioeconomic status and their deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Otol. 2016;37:e110-e117.
22.
ChristakisDALowrySJGoldbergGVioletteHGarrisonMM.Assessment of a parent-child interaction intervention for language development in children. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e195738.
23.
ChristakisDAGilkersonJYapanelU, et al. Audible television and decreased adult words, infant vocalizations, and conversational turns: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:554-558.
24.
ZimmermanFJChristakisDAMeltzoffA.Associations between media viewing and language development in children under age 2 years. J Pediatr. 2007;151:364-368.
25.
MendelsohnALBerkuleSBTomopoulosS, et al. Infant television and video exposure associated with limited parent-child verbal interactions in low socioeconomic status households. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:411-417.
26.
AmbroseSEVanDamMMoellerMP.Linguistic input, electronic media, and communication outcomes of toddlers with hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2014;35:139.
27.
LapierreMAPiotrowskiJTLinebargerDL.Background television in the homes of US children. Pediatrics. 2012;130:839-846.
GreenwoodCRThiemann-BourqueKWalkerDBuzhardtJGilkersonJ.Assessing children’s home language environments using automatic speech recognition technology. Commun Disord Q. 2011;32:83-92.
Yoshinaga-ItanoCSedeyALWigginMChungW.Early hearing detection and vocabulary of children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 2017;140(2):e20162964.
33.
HartBRisleyTR.American parenting of language-learning children: persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments. Dev Psychol. 1992;28:1096-1105.
34.
BornsteinMHHahnCSHaynesOM.Specific and general language performance across early childhood: stability and gender considerations. First Lang. 2004;24:267-304.
35.
WangYWilliamsRDilleyLHoustonDM.A meta-analysis of the predictability of LENA automated measures for child language development. Dev Rev. 2020;57:100921.
36.
MerzECMaskusEAMelvinSAHeXNobleKG.Socioeconomic disparities in language input are associated with children’s language-related brain structure and reading skills. Child Dev. 2020;91:846-860.
37.
SperryDESperryLLMillerPJ.Reexamining the verbal environments of children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Child Dev. 2019;90:1303-1318.
38.
VandewaterEABickhamDSLeeJHCummingsHMWartellaEARideoutVJ.When the television is always on: heavy television exposure and young children’s development. Am Behav Sci. 2005;48:562-577.
39.
ChonchaiyaWPruksananondaC.Television viewing associates with delayed language development. Acta Paediatrica. 2008;97:977-982.
40.
TanimuraMOkumaKKyoshimaK.Television viewing, reduced parental utterance, and delayed speech development in infants and young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:618-619.
41.
KirkorianHLPempekTAMurphyLASchmidtMEAndersonDR.The impact of background television on parent-child interaction. Child Dev. 2009;80:1350-1359.
