To investigate the incidence, nature, severity, and recovery of early dysphagia in patients following surgical resection of oral and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with a mandibular lingual release approach (MLRA).
Study Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Tertiary head and neck cancer center.
Methods
Inclusion of patients’ after surgical resection of oral cavity and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma via an MLRA between 2012 and 2017. Data collection included acute medical care, enteral feeding, and swallowing outcomes derived from clinical swallow examination and videofluoroscopic swallowing study assessments at baseline, after surgery, and prior to discharge.
Results
Twenty-eight patients were eligible for participation (23 males; mean age, 63 years). Baseline clinical swallow examination findings revealed that 32% (n = 9) were tolerating normal diet and fluids preoperatively (Functional Oral Intake Scale [FOIS] = 7). Following surgery, the majority (n = 21, 75%) experienced severe dysphagia (FOIS ≤4), of which 15 were nil by mouth. Twelve patients received a postoperative videofluoroscopic swallowing study, with silent aspiration observed in 9 cases. At discharge, 12 (43%) patients had persistent severe functional dysphagia (FOIS ≤4) with ongoing enteral feeding requirements, of which 7 were nil by mouth. Eleven (39%) were managing diets of modified fluid/diet consistencies (FOIS = 5), and 5 (18%) had mild dysphagia (FOIS ≥6) at discharge. None were able to manage a normal diet. The average length of hospital stay was 27.9 days.
Conclusions
Early dysphagia post-MLRA is a common and often severe complication of surgery. Patients require extended hospital admission with prolonged enteral feeding, which may persist postdischarge. This cohort requires early intervention by speech-language pathology services to aid swallow rehabilitation.
BulsaraVMWorthingtonHVGlennyA-MClarksonJEConwayDIMacluskeyM.Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12(12):CD006205. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006205.pub4
2.
BaijensLWJWalsheMAaltonenLM, et al. European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(2):577-616. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06507-5
3.
RosellóÀAlbuquerqueRRoselló-LlabrésXMarí-RoigAEstrugo-DevesaALópez-LópezJ. Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020;25(5):e599-e607. doi:10.4317/medoral.23632
4.
KaoSS-TPetersMDJKrishnanSGOoiEH. Swallowing outcomes following primary surgical resection and primary free flap reconstruction for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(7):1572-1580. doi:10.1002/lary.25894
5.
DevineJCRogersSNMcNallyDBrownJSVaughanED. A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(3):199-204. doi:10.1054/ijom.2000.0038
6.
StanleyRB.Mandibular lingual releasing approach to oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 1984;94(5):596-600. doi:10.1288/00005537-198405000-00002
7.
SongMLiQLLiFJ, et al. Mandibular lingual release approach: an appropriate approach for total or subtotal glossectomy. Head Neck Oncol. 2013;5(2):11.
8.
LiHLiJYangBSuMXingRHanZ.Mandibular lingual release versus mandibular lip-split approach for expanded resection of middle–late tongue cancer: a case-control study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(7):1054-1058. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.008
9.
CilentoBWIzzardMWeymullerEAFutranN.Comparison of approaches for oral cavity cancer resection: lip-split versus visor flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(3):428-432. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.05.006
10.
DeanAAlamillosFGarcıä a-LópezASánchezJPeñalbaM.The use of Mitek pins in the mandibular lingual releasing approach to oral and/or oropharyngeal carcinomas: a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000;28(5):308-311. doi:10.1054/jcms.2000.0164
11.
LiWLiRSafdarJ, et al. Modified visor approach applied to total or subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction: avoidance of lip splitting and mandibulotomy and cutting off mental nerve. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(8):7847-7852. doi:10.1007/s13277-014-2036-4
12.
StringerSPJordanJRMendenhallWMParsonsJTCassisiNJMillionRR.Mandibular lingual releasing approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;107(3):395-398. doi:10.1177/019459989210700309
13.
Hardingham NWEClaytonNGallagherR.Does the mandibular lingual release approach impact post-operative swallowing in patients with oral cavity and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas? A scoping review. Speech Lang Hear. Published online April 16, 2022. doi:10.1080/2050571X.2022.2064114
14.
World Health Organisation. International Classification of Diseases. 11th ed.Accessed October 2, 2019. https://icd.who.int/en
CraryMAMannGDCGroherME.Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1516-1520. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.049
17.
ZuydamACRogersSNGraysonKProbertCF.Routine use of swallowing outcome measures following head and neck cancer in a multidisciplinary clinic setting. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;25(2):e185-e192. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1708896
18.
KotzTFedermanADKaoJ, et al. Prophylactic swallowing exercises in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiation: a randomized trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(4):376-382. doi:10.1001/archoto.2012.187
19.
YeeKWongSMTeoI, et al. Validity and reliability of the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory in English and Chinese in head and neck cancer patients. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020;16(6):372-379. doi:10.1111/ajco.13384
TurkingtonLWardECFarrellAPorterLWallLR.Impact of carbonation on neurogenic dysphagia and an exploration of the clinical predictors of a response to carbonation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(3):499-513. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12458
22.
HutchesonKABarrowMPBarringerDA, et al. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST): scale development and validation. Cancer. 2017;123(1):62-70. doi:10.1002/cncr.30283
23.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 7th ed.Springer; 2010.
24.
ManikantanKKhodeSSayedSI, et al. Dysphagia in head and neck cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35(8):724-732. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.008
25.
PauloskiBR.Rehabilitation of dysphagia following head and neck cancer. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19(4):889-928. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2008.05.010
26.
O’ConnellMFreemanLDonnellyRWongT.Indications and complications of prophylactic gastrostomy feeding tubes (PGTS) in the management of patients with advanced head & neck cancer (HNC) undergoing chemoradiation therapy (CRT) or combined modality surgery with post-operative radiotherapy (SRT). Radiother Oncol. 2007;82:1. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(07)80227-1
27.
AndradeMSGonçalvesANGuedesRLV, et al. Correlation between swallowing-related quality of life and videofluoroscopy after head and neck cancer treatment. Codas. 2017;29(1):e20150175. doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20172015175
28.
PandeyDGibbsLSahuKKSiddiquiAD.Use of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (pPEG) tube in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and correlation of weight loss with treatment interruptions. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15, suppl):e17509. doi:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e17509
29.
CaccialanzaRKlersyCCeredaE, et al. Nutritional parameters associated with prolonged hospital stay among ambulatory adult patients. CMAJ. 2010;182(17):1843-1849. doi:10.1503/cmaj.091977
30.
Adjei BoakyeEJohnstonKJMoulinTA, et al. Factors associated with head and neck cancer hospitalization cost and length of stay: a national study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019;42(2):172-178. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000000487
31.
PittsKDArteagaAAStevensBP, et al. Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(4):664-671. doi:10.1177/0194599818825466
32.
JandaliDBVaughanDEggerstedtM, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in head and neck surgery: reduced opioid use and length of stay. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(5):1227-1232. doi:10.1002/lary.28191
33.
StewartSRobertsonCPanJ, et al. Impact of healthcare-associated infection on length of stay. J Hosp Infect. 2021;114:23-31. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2021.02.026
34.
CaburetCFarigonNMulliezA, et al. Impact of nutritional status at the outset of assessment on postoperative complications in head and neck cancer. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020;137(5):393-398. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2019.12.005
35.
KrebbersISimonSRPilzWKremerBWinkensBBaijensLWJ. Patients with head-and-neck cancer: dysphagia and affective symptoms. Folia Phoniatr Logop. Published online July 3, 2020. doi:10.1159/000508367
36.
GeoffrionRGongMKoenigN, et al. Depression and anxiety in surgical patients: an observational study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(5):674-675. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2020.02.042
