Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gault
RH
Progress in experiments on tactual interpretation of oral speech . J Abnorm Social Psychol
1924 ; 14 : 155 –9 .
2.
Kirman
JH
Tactile communication of speech: a review and an analysis . Psychol Bull
1973 ; 80 : 54 –74 .
3.
Keidel
WD
The cochlear model in skin stimulation. In:
Geldard
FA
ed. Cutaneous communication systems and devices . Austin, Texas : Psychonomic Society,
1974 :27 –32 .
4.
Carney
AE
The place of tactile aids in rehabilitative audiology . Proceedings of Scott Reger Memorial Conference. Iowa City, Iowa: April 12–14, 1984 (in press).
5.
Kienle
M
Carney
AE
Miyamoto
RT
Pope
ML
. Cochlear implant and vibrotactile aid: how do they compare? . ASHA
1982 ; 25 : 63 .
6.
Roeser
RJ
Friel-Patti
S
Scott
BL
. Development and evaluation of a tactile aid for the reception of speech . Audiology
1983 ; 8 : 79 –94 .
7.
Pickett
JM
McFarland
W
. Auditory implants and tactile aids for the profoundly deaf . J Speech Hear Res
1985 ; 28 : 134 –50 .
8.
Franklin
D
. Tactile aids: new help for the profoundly deaf . Hear J
1984 ; 37 : 20 –5 .
9.
Cholewiak
RW
Sherrick
CE
. Tracking skill of a deaf person with long-term tactile aid experience: a case study . J Rehabil Res Dev
1986 ; 23 : 20 –6 .
10.
Punch
JL
Miyamoto
RT
. Supplementary use of hearing aids by cochlear implantees . ASHA
1985 ; 27 : 87 .
11.
McConkey
AJ
Osberger
MJ
Miyamoto
RT
Kienle
ML
Myres
WA
. Speech-tracking performance in single-channel cochlear implant subjects . J Speech Hear Res
1986 ; 28 : 565 –78 .
12.
Erber
N
Alencewicz
C
. Audiological evaluation of deaf children . J Speech Hear Dis
1976 ; 41 : 256 –67 .
13.
Owens
E
Kessler
DK
Telleen
C
Schubert
ED
. The minimal auditory capabilities (MAC) battery . Hear Aid J
1981 ; 34 : 9 –34 .
14.
DeFilippo
CL
Scott
BL
. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech . J Acoust Soc Am
1978 ; 63 : 1186 –92 .
