There are a variety of methods for treating unilateral vocal cord paralysis, but to date there are few objective studies that evaluate the functional results of nerve transfer from the ansa cervicalis. Six dogs underwent unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve section with immediate reanastamosis to the sternothyroid branch of the ansa cervicalis. After 5 to 6 months, measurements of vocal efficiency and acoustic parameters, videolaryngoscopy, videostroboscopy, and evoked electromyography were performed. Identical measurements were made in eight control dogs during normal electrically induced phonation and a simulated unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Histologic analysis of both vocalis muscles, recurrent laryngeal nerves, ansa cervicalis, and the ansa-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis site was performed. Evidence of reinnervation was found in all of the animals that underwent nerve transfer. The vocal efficiency and acoustic quality after ansa cervicalis nerve transfer were dependent on the degree of electrical stimulation from the transferred nerve to the reinnervated cord during phonation. In the absence of electrical stimulation to the nerve transfer, physiologic vocal cord motion could not be elicited from the reinnervated cord.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldGE. Vocal rehabilitation of paralytic dysphoria. VIII. Phoniatric methods of vocal compensation. Arch Otolaryngol1962; 76: 76–83.
2.
IsshikiNOkamuraHIshikawaT. Thyroplasty type I (lateral compression) for dysphoria due to vocal cord paralysis or atrophy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1975; 80: 465–73.
HorsleyJ. Suture of the recurrent laryngeal nerve with report of a case. Trans South Surg Gynecol Assoc1909; 22: 161–7.
10.
BlalockACroweSJ. The recurrent laryngeal nerves in dogs: Experimental studies. Arch Surg1926; 12: 95–116.
11.
FrazierCHMosserWB. Treatment of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis by nerve anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet1926; 43: 134–9.
12.
HooverWB. Surgical procedures for the relief of symptoms of paralysis of the recurrent layngeal nerves. Surg Clin North Am1953; 33: 879–85.
13.
SiribodhiCSunderlandWAtkinsJP, Electromyographic studies of laryngeal paralysis and regeneration of laryngeal motor nerves in dogs. Laryngoscope1963; 73: 148–63.
14.
CrumleyRL. Laryngeal synkinesis: Its significance to the laryngologist. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1988; 97: 87–91.
15.
DoylePJBrummettREEvertsEC. Results of surgical section and repair of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope1967; 77: 1245–54.
16.
GordonJHMcCabeBF. The effect of accurate neurorrhaphy on reinnervation and return of laryngeal function. Laryngoscope1968; 78: 236–59.
17.
BolesRFritzellB. Injury and repair of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in dogs. Laryngoscope1969; 79: 1405–18.
18.
TashiroT. Experimental studies on the reinnervation of the larynx after accurate neurorrhaphy. Laryngoscope1972; 82: 225–36.
SatoIHarveyJEOguraJH. Impairment of function of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles after regeneration of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope1974; 84: 53–66.
21.
DedoHH. Electromyographic and visual evaluation of recurrent laryngeal nerve anastamosis in dogs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1971; 80: 664–8.
22.
EllenbogenBGGerberTGCoonRLToohillRJ. Accessory muscle activity and respiration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1981; 89: 360–75.
23.
MarieJPDehesdinDDucastelleTSenantJ. Selective reinnervation of the abductor and adductor muscles of the canine larynx after recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1989; 98: 530–6.
24.
ArmstrongBSmithDJ. Function of certain neck muscles during the respiratory cycle. Am J Physiol1955; 182: 599–600.
25.
WoodsonGE. Respiratory activity of the cricothyroid muscle in conscious humans. Laryngoscope1990; 100: 49–53.
26.
CrumleyRL. Selective reinnervation of vocal cord adductors in unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1984; 93: 351–6.
27.
UedaNOhyamaMHarveyJEMogiGOguraJH. Subglottic pressure and induced live voices of dogs with normal, reinnervated and paralyzed larynges. II. Comparison of voice function of dogs with normal and reinnervated larynges. Laryngoscope1971; 81: 74–86.
28.
IwamuraS. Functioning remobilization of the paralyzed vocal cord in dogs. Arch Otolaryngol1973; 100: 122–9.
29.
GreenDCWardPW. Management of the divided recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope1990; 100: 779–82.
30.
JaneckaIP. Peripheral nerve regeneration: An experimental study. Laryngoscope1987; 97: 942–50.
31.
Van den BergJW. Direct and indirect determination of the mean subglottic pressure. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1956; 8: 1–24.
32.
IwataS. Aerodynamic aspects for phonation in normal and pathologic larynges. In: FujimuraO, ed. Vocal physiology: Voice production. Mechanisms and functions. New York: Raven Press, Ltd, 1988: 423–31.
33.
TanakaSGouldW. Vocal efficiency and aerodynamic aspects in voice disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1985; 94: 29–33.
LudlowCCoulterDGentgesF. The differential sensitivity of frequency perturbation to laryngeal neoplasms and neuropathologies. In: BlessDMAbbsJH, eds. Vocal fold physiology: Contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego, Calif.: College-Hill Press, 1983: 381–92.
36.
MilenkovicP. Least mean squares measures of voice perturbation. J Speech Hearing Res1987; 30: 529–38.
37.
LiebermanP. Some acoustic measurements of the fundamental periodicity of normal and pathologic larynges. J Acoust Soc Am1963; 35: 344–53.
38.
ZyskiBBullGMcDonaldWJohnsM. Perturbation analysis of normal and pathologic larynges. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1984; 36: 190–8.
39.
IwataS. Periodicities of pitch perturbations in normal and pathologic larynges. Laryngoscope1972; 87: 87–95.
40.
McDonaldWZyskiBJohnsMBullG. Adjunctive use of perturbation analysis for objective assessment of laryngeal surgery. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 1981).
41.
BerkeGMooreDGerrattBHansonDBellTNatividadM. The effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model. Laryngoscope1989; 99: 977–82.
42.
KoyamaTHarveyJEOguraJH. Mechanics of voice production. III. Efficiency of voice production. Laryngoscope1971; 81: 210–7.
43.
van HarreveldA. Re-innervation of denervated muscle fibers by adjacent functioning motor units. Am J Physiol1945; 144: 477–93.
44.
PeytzFRasmussenHBuchthalF. Conduction time and velocity in human recurrent laryngeal nerves. Dan Med Bull1965; 12: 125–7.
45.
SteissJEMarshallAE. Electromyographic evaluation of conduction time and velocity of the recurrent laryngeal nerve of clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res1988; 49: 1533–6.
46.
HurshJB. Conduction velocity and diameter of nerve fibers. Am J Physiol1939; 127: 131–9.
47.
BraundKGStreissJEMarshallAEMehtaJRAmlingKA. Morphologic and morphometric studies of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles in clinically normal adult dogs. Am J Vet Res1988; 49: 2105–10.
48.
AtkinsJP. An electromyographic study of recurrent laryngeal nerve conduction and its clinical application. Laryngoscope1973; 83: 796–807.
49.
ShinTRabuzziD. Conduction studies of the canine recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope1971; 81: 586–96.
50.
RiceDHCooperDS. Contractile properties of the canine thyroarytenoid muscle reinnervated from the ansa cervicalis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1989; 98: 153–6.
51.
FataJJMalmgrenLTGacekRRDumRWooP. Histochemical study of posterior cricoarytenoid muscle reinnervation by a nerve-muscle pedicle in the cat. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1987; 96: 469–87.
52.
Grundfest-BroniatowskiSBroniatowskiMDaviesCR, An artificial myotatic reflex: A potential avenue to fine motor control. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989; 101: 621–8.
53.
BroniatowskiMKanekoSJacobsGNoséYTuckerHM. Laryngeal pacemaker. II. Electronic pacing of reinnervated posterior cricoarytenoid muscles in the canine. Laryngoscope1985; 95: 1194–8.
