Assessing the Future of Oil and Gas Production and Local Government Revenue in Five Western US Basins

Abstract

Oil and gas production is a major source of public revenue in many US regions, but uncertainty exists over the future of demand for hydrocarbons. We model how oil and gas production and related government revenue change in five western US basins depending on future oil and natural gas prices under three scenarios of climate policy ambition. We find that the Green River and San Juan basins experience production declines across all scenarios, while production in the Bakken, Permian, and Powder River basins are more dependent on prices. Government revenue generally follows the direction of production, but these relationships are not directly proportional. Under the lower price scenarios, revenue declines more steeply than production because it reflects both production and prices, which both decline. Long-term permanent funds, which are in place across all the states we examine, provide an important fiscal cushion for school districts, their primary beneficiary.

JEL Classification: H71, H72, H73, O13, Q41, Q48

Keywords

oil and gas production energy transition local public finance oil and gas modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agerton

Hartley

Medlock

III Temzelides.

2015. “Employment Impacts of Upstream Oil and Gas Investment in the United States.” IMF Working Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Alexeev

Conrad

2009. “The Elusive Curse of Oil.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91: 586–8. doi:10.1162/rest.91.3.586.

Bartik

A. W.

Currie

Greenstone

Knittel

C. R.

(2019). The Local Economic and Welfare Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4): 105–155. doi: 10.1257/app.20170487

BEA. 2023. “Welcome to the RIMS II Online Order and Delivery System.” https://apps.bea.gov/regional/rims/rimsii/.

Blended Finance Taskforce and Centre for Sustainability Transitions. 2022. Making Climate Capital Work: Unlocking $8.5bn for South Africa’s Just Energy Transition. South Africa: Centre for Sustainability Transitions.

bp. 2021. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. London: bp.

Brown

2014. Production of Natural Gas from Shale in Local Economies: A Resource Blessing or Curse? Kansas, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

Brown

2015. “The Response of Employment to Changes in Oil and Gas Exploration and Drilling.” Economic Review 100: 57–81.

Brown

J. P.

Fitzgerald

Weber

J. G.

2016. “Capturing Rents from Natural Resource Abundance: Private Royalties from US Onshore Oil & Gas Production.” Resource and Energy Economics 46: 23–38. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.07.003.

10.

Brown

J. P.

Fitzgerald

Weber

J. G.

2019. “Does Resource Ownership Matter? Oil and Gas Royalties and the Income Effect of Extraction.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6: 1039–64. doi:10.1086/705505.

11.

Brown

J. P.

Maniloff

Manning

2020. “Spatially Variable Taxation and Resource Extraction: The Impact of State Oil Taxes on Drilling in the US.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 103: 102354. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102354.

12.

Cecire

2019. “The POWER Initiative: Energy Transition as Economic Development.” CRS Report No. R46105. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

13.

Cha

Pastor

Wander

Sadd

Morello-Frosch.

2019. A Roadmap to an Equitable Low-Carbon Future: Four Pillars for a Just Transition. Climate Equity Network.

14.

Considine

Watson

Blumsack

2010. The Economic Impacts of the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Play: An Update. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

15.

Considine

Watson

Blumsack

2011. The Pennsylvania Marcellus Natural Gas Industry: Status, Economic Impacts, and Future Potential. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

16.

Deck

2008. Projecting the Economic Impact of the Fayetteville Shale Play for 2008–2012. Fayetteville: Center for Business and Economic Research, University of Arkansas.

17.

Energy Information Administration. 2012. “Total Energy Table 3.2 Value of Fossil Fuel Production, 1949–2011.” https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/showtext.php?t=ptb0302 (accessed December 6, 2022).

18.

Feyrer

Mansur

E. T.

Sacerdote

.2017. “Geographic Dispersion of Economic Shocks: Evidence from the Fracking Revolution.” American Economic Review 107: 1313–34. doi:10.1257/aer.20151326.

19.

Freeman

D. G.

2009. “The ‘Resource Curse’ and Regional US Development.” Applied Economics Letters 16: 527–30. doi:10.1080/13504850601032107.

20.

Gourley

Madonia

(2018). Resource booms and crime: Evidence from oil and gas production in Colorado. Resource and Energy Economics, 54: 37–52. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.07.001.

21.

Greenspon

Raimi

2022. “Matching Geographies and Job Skills in the Energy Transition.” Working Paper 22-25. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

22.

Gulley

D. A.

1982. “Models and Mitigation in Energy Boom-Towns.” Resources and Energy 4: 87–104. doi:10.1016/0165-0572(82)90021-4.

23.

Gylfason

2001. “Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development.” European Economic Review 45: 847–59. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00127-1.

24.

Hafstead

M. A. C.

Williams

R. C.

Chen

2022. “Environmental Policy, Full-Employment Models, and Employment: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 9: 199–234. doi:10.1086/716598.

25.

Haggerty

Gude

P. H.

Delorey

Rasker.

2014. “Long-Term Effects of Income Specialization in Oil and Gas Extraction: The US West, 1980–2011.” Energy Economics 45: 186–95. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.06.020.

26.

Haggerty

J. H.

Haggerty

M. N.

Roemer

Rose

2018. “Planning for the Local Impacts of Coal Facility Closure: Emerging Strategies in the US West.” Resources Policy 57: 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.010.

27.

Hintz

Uebelhor

Gold

2021. Inventory of State Solar Property Tax Treatments (No. 54). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy.

28.

International Energy Agency. 2022a. World Energy Employment. Paris, France: IEA.

29.

International Energy Agency. 2022b. World Energy Outlook 2022. Paris, France: IEA.

30.

IHS. 2012. America’s New Energy Future: The Unconventional Oil and Gas Revolution and the US Economy. London: IHS Markit.

31.

IHS Markit. 2020. The Future of Work: The Influence of New Technologies on Employment and Demographic Trends in the Oil, Natural Gas, and Petrochemical Industries. London: IHS Markit.

32.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Jacobsen

G. D.

Parker

D. P.

2014. “The Economic Aftermath of Resource Booms: Evidence from Boomtowns in the American West.” The Economic Journal 126: 1092–128. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12173.

34.

James

2015. “US State Fiscal Policy and Natural Resources.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7: 238–57. doi:10.1257/pol.20130211.

35.

James

Aadland

2011. “The Curse of Natural Resources: An Empirical Investigation of US Counties.” Resource and Energy Economics 33: 440–53. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.05.006.

36.

James

(2017). Natural resources and education outcomes in the United States. Resource and Energy Economics, 49: 150–164. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.04.004.

37.

Just Transition Centre. 2017. Just Transition: A Report for the OECD. Paris: Just Transition Centre.

38.

Just Transition Fund. 2020. National Economic Transition Platform. Just Transition Fund.

39.

Klasic

Schomburg

Arnold

York

Baum

Cherin

Cliff

, et al. 2022. “A Review of Community Impacts of Boom-Bust Cycles in Unconventional Oil and Gas Development.” Energy Research & Social Science 93: 102843. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102843.

40.

Krupnick

A. J.

Echarte

2017. Economic Impacts of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

41.

Lashitew

A. A.

Ross

M. L.

Werker

2021. “What Drives Successful Economic Diversification in Resource-Rich Countries?” The World Bank Research Observer 36: 164–96. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkaa001.

42.

Look

Robertson

Higdon

Propp

2021. Labor Policies to Enable Fairness for Workers and Communities in Transition (No. 21– 06). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and Environmental Defense Fund.

43.

Maniloff

Mastromonaco

(2017). The local employment impacts of fracking: A national study. Resource and Energy Economics, 49: 62–85. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.04.005

44.

Marchand

Weber

J. G.

2020. “How Local Economic Conditions Affect School Finances, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement: Evidence from the Texas Shale Boom.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 39: 36–63. doi:10.1002/pam.22171.

45.

Michaels

2011. “The Long Term Consequences of Resource-Based Specialisation.” The Economic Journal 121: 31–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02402.x.

46.

Morris

A. C.

Kaufman

Doshi

2021. “Revenue at Risk in Coal-Reliant Counties.” Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy 2: 83–116. doi:10.1086/711307.

47.

Muehlenbachs

Spiller

Timmins

2015. “The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development.” American Economic Review 105: 3633–59. doi:10.1257/aer.20140079.

48.

Muttitt

Kartha

2020. “Equity, Climate Justice and Fossil Fuel Extraction: Principles for a Managed Phase Out.” Climate Policy 20: 1024–42. doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1763900.

49.

New Mexico State Investment Council. 2023. Land Grant Permanent Fund. Albequerque, NM: New Mexico State Investment Council.

50.

Newell

R. G.

Raimi

2018a. “US State and Local Oil and Gas Revenue Sources and Uses.” Energy Policy 112: 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.002.

51.

Newell

R. G.

Raimi.

2018b. “The Fiscal Impacts of Increased US Oil and Gas Development on Local Governments.” Energy Policy 117: 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.042.

52.

Ouedraogo

2012. “Local Economic Impact of Boom and Bust in Mineral Resource Extraction in the United States: A Spatial Econometrics Analysis.” Resources Policy 50: 292–305. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.09.009.

53.

Papyrakis

Gerlagh

2007. “Resource Abundance and Economic Growth in the United States.” European Economic Review 51: 1011–39. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.04.001.

54.

Plumer

2022. “Wealthy Nations Offer Indonesia $20 Billion to Curb Coal.” The New York Times, November 11, 2022.

55.

Prest

B. C.

2022. “Supply-Side Reforms to Oil and Gas Production on Federal Lands: Modeling the Implications for CO₂ Emissions, Federal Revenues, and Leakage.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 9: 681–720. doi:10.1086/718963.

56.

Raimi

Campbell

Newell

R. G.

Prest

Villanueva

Wingenroth

2022. Global Energy Outlook 2022: Turning Points and Tension in the Energy Transition. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

57.

Raimi

Carley

Konisky

2022. “Mapping County-Level Vulnerability to the Energy Transition in US Fossil Fuel Communities.” Scientific Reports 12: 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19927-6.

58.

Raimi

Grubert

Higdon

Metcalf

Pesek

Singh

2022. “The Fiscal Implications of the US Transition Away from Fossil Fuels.” Working Paper 22-3. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

59.

Ravikumar

Latimer

T. M.

2022. “Notes from the Oil Patch: Planning for a Worker-Focused Transition in the Oil and Gas Industry.” https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/3410/.

60.

Rickman

D. S.

Wang

Winters

J. V.

2017. “Is Shale Development Drilling Holes in the Human Capital Pipeline?” Energy Economics 62: 283–90. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.013.

61.

Sachs

J. D.

Warner

A. M.

1995. “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth (No. w5398).” Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w5398.

62.

Scheer

Schwarz

Hopkins

Caldecott

2022. “Whose Jobs Face Transition Risk in Alberta? Understanding Sectoral Employment Precarity in an Oil-Rich Canadian Province.” Climate Policy 22: 1016–32. doi:10.1080/14693062.2022.2086843.

63.

Segal

2012. “How to Spend It: Resource Wealth and the Distribution of Resource Rents.” Energy Policy, Renewable Energy in China 51: 340–8. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.029.

64.

Uebelhor

Hintz

Gold

2021. Inventory of State Wind Property Tax Treatments (No. 55). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy.

65.

US Census Bureau. 2022. County Business Patterns: 2020. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.

66.

Weber

J. G.

2012. “The Effects of a Natural Gas Boom on Employment and Income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming.” Energy Economics 34: 1580–88. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.013.

67.

Weber

J. G.

(2014). A decade of natural gas development: The makings of a resource curse? Resource and Energy Economics, 37: 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.013.

68.

Weber

J. G.

Burnett

J. W.

Xiarchos

I. M.

2016. “Broadening Benefits from Natural Resource Extraction: Housing Values and Taxation of Natural Gas Wells as Property.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 35: 587–614. doi:10.1002/pam.21911.

69.

Weber

J. G.

Hitaj

2015. “What Can We Learn about Shale Gas Development from Land Values? Opportunities, Challenges, and Evidence from Texas and Pennsylvania.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 44: 40–58. doi:10.1017/S1068280500010212.

70.

Weinstein

A. L.

Partridge

M. D.

Tsvetkova

2018. “Follow the Money: Aggregate, Sectoral and Spatial Effects of an Energy Boom on Local Earnings.” Resources Policy 55: 196–209. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.11.018.

71.

White House. 2022. “Fact Sheet: Biden-Harris Administration Races to Deploy Clean Energy that Creates Jobs and Lowers Costs.” The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/01/12/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-races-to-deploy-clean-energy-that-creates-jobs-and-lowers-costs/ (accessed November 17, 2022).

72.

Zuo

Schieffer

Buck

2018. “The Effect of the Oil and Gas Boom on Schooling Decisions in the US.” Resource and Energy Economics 55: 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.10.002.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.69 MB

0.03 MB