Community Property: Digital Music and the Economic Modalities of Transmission and Ritual Modes of Communication

Abstract

Using the evolution of the peer-to-peer music-sharing phenomenon as a spring-board, this article explores the economic modalities inherent in two different but not mutually exclusive theoretic constructs of communication advanced by James Carey. The transmission mode of communication theorizes that communication is the transmission of information from one point to another. The ritual mode of communication theorizes forms of communication whose primary purpose is to strengthen communal bonds by sharing communication/communal experiences. Religious ceremonies and music are two prime examples of communication experiences whose primary purpose is not to transmit information. This article examines the role digital recording technologies, the Internet, and the World Wide Web play in pointing out the economic conflicts inherent in these two modes of communication. The recent spate of lawsuits initiated by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) against music swapping and file sharing over the Internet is one tangible example of these economic conflicts.

Keywords

James Carey ritual mode transmission mode Harold Innis file sharing MP3s digital music copyright Internet peer-to-peer networking P2P media economics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bugeja, M. J. (2001, March 30). The advent of print on demand:... But make sure you read the fine print. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B9-B10.

Calaba, V. F. (2002). Quibbles ’n bits: Making a digital first sale doctrine feasible. Michigan Telecommunication Technology Law Review, 9. Available at http://www.mttlr.org/volnine/Calaba.pdf

Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

CNN Moneyline . (2004, January 21). More song swappers sued. Retrieved May 11, 2005, from http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/21/technology/riaa_suits

de Sola Pool, I. (1990). Technology and culture. In E. M. Noam (Ed.), Technologies without boundaries: On telecommunications in a global age (pp. 239-262). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

de Sola Pool, I. (1998). From Gutenberg to electronics: Implications for the First Amendment. In L. S. Etheredge (Ed.), Politics in wired nations: Selected writings of Ithiel de Sola Pool (pp. 329-337). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Eisenstein, E. (1983). The printing revolution in early modern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft . (2003). MPEG Audio Layer 3: History. Retrieved from the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Web site February 2004 from http://www.iis.fhg.de/amm/techinf/layer3/index.html

Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Greenfield, K. T. (2000, October 2). Meet the Napster. Time, pp. 59-68.

11.

Hyde, R. (2001). The first sale doctrine and digital phonorecords. Duke Law & Technology Review. Retrieved May 11, 2004, from http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2001dltr0018.html

12.

Innis, H. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

13.

Klinefelter, A. (2001). Will the first sale doctrine disappear? Information Outlook, 5(5), 1-20.

14.

Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 221-239). London: Routledge.

15.

Lee, L. T. (2000). Privacy, security and intellectual property. In A. B. Albarran & D. H. Goff (Eds.), Understanding the Web: Social, political and economic dimensions of the Internet (pp. 135-164). Ames: Iowa State University Press.

16.

Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

Mosco, V. (1989). The pay-per society: Computers and communication in the age of information. Toronto: Garamond.

18.

Oberholzer, F. , & Strumpf, K. (2004). The effects of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis (University of North Carolina Business School study). Retrieved May 12, 2004, from http://www.unc.edu/cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf

19.

Powell, A. (2001). MP3: The transformation of an industry. Wired Digital Inc. 1994-2001. Retrieved May 10, 2004, from http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/templates/print_template.htmlt?meta=/webmonkey/99/06/index2a_meta.html

20.

Rainsford, M. (2003). A musician’s take on file sharing, DRM, and copyleft licensing. Retrieved March 20,2004, from http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2003/06/10/musician_pov.html

21.

Reese, A. R. (2003). The first sale doctrine in the era of digital networks. Boston College Law Review, 44, 577.

22.

Sagan, C. (1977). The dragon of Eden. New York: Random House.

23.

Soules, A. (2002, December 12). The rights and wrongs of the doctrine of first sale. Retrieved May 1, 2004, from http://12.108.175.91/ebookweb/stories/storyReader$1816

24.

Stefic, M. (1999). The Internet edge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

25.

Tallmo, K. (in press). The history of copyright: A critical overview with source texts in five languages. Stockholm, Sweden: Nisu. Retrieved May 12, 2004, from http://www.copyrighthistory.com/anne.html