In an effort to promote localism in U.S. broadcasting, the Federal Communications Commission began licensing Low-Power FM (LPFM) radio in January 2000. FCC rules require that LPFM stations are noncommercial, locally owned and operated, and broadcast at power of 100 watts or less, with signals that travel three to five miles. This article focuses on LPFM programmers’ statements of uncertainty about audience constitution and presence. Given that the establishment of LPFM service rides on the argument that, due to consolidation, there is a need for local stations to produce locally originated programming, serving unique community interests, it is striking to hear programmers reveal they are unsure if any community members are tuning in. In addition to raising questions about prevailing expectations for a form of radio imagined to be the essence of American broadcasting, their comments support claims made by scholars of media policy about the need to reconceptualize localism dur ing a period of media convergence.
Anderson, B. ( 2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.
2.
Benkler, Y. ( 2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Braman, S. ( 2007). The ideal v. the real in media localism: Regulatory implications . Communication Law Policy, 12, 231-278.
4.
Brown, R. ( 1996). The strength of the people. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
5.
Calabrese, A. ( 2001). Why localism? Communication technology and the shifting scales of political community. In G. Shepherd & E. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), Communication and community (pp. 251-270). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Carey, J. ( 1992). Culture as communication. New York : Routledge.
7.
Carey, J. ( 1996). The Chicago School and mass communication research. In E. Dennis & E. Wartella (Eds.), American communication research: The remembered history (pp. 123-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Castells, M. ( 1997). The power of identity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
9.
Collins, T.A. ( 1980). Local service concept. Iowa Law Review , 65, 553-635.
10.
Cowling, P. ( 2005). An earthy enigma: The role of localism in the political, cultural and economic dimensions of media ownership regulation. Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal, 27, 257-358.
11.
DiCola, P. ( 2007). Employment and wage effects of radio consolidation. In P. Napoli (Ed.), Media diversity and localism: Meaning and metrics (pp. 57-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Fofana, F. ( 1999). Creating a diversity of voices: Local expression through a low power service. Communication Law Conspectus, 7, 409-421.
13.
Gibson, G. ( 1977). Public broadcasting: The role of the federal government 1912-76. New York: Praeger.
Hilliard, R., & Keith, M. ( 2005). The quieted voice: The rise and demise of localism in American radio. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
16.
Hilmes, M. ( 1997). Radio voices: American broadcasting, 1922-1952. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Hjort, M., & MacKenzie, S. (Eds.). (2000). Cinema and nation. New York: Routledge.
18.
Horwitz, R.B. ( 1989). The irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Jenkins, H. ( 1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture . New York: Routledge.
20.
Jenkins, H. ( 2003). Quentin Tarantino’s Star Wars? Digital cinema, media convergence and participatory culture. In D. Thorburn & H. Jenkins (Eds.), Rethinking media change: The aesthetics of transition (pp. 281-312). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Kirby, A. ( 1989). A sense of place. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 322-326.
22.
Klinenberg, E. ( 2007). Fighting for air: The battle to control America’s media. New York: Metropolitan Books .
23.
Lipsitz, G. ( 1994). Dangerous crossroads: Popular music, postmodernism, and the poetics of place. New York: Verso.
Meyrowitz, J. ( 1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Meyrowitz, J. ( 1989). The generalized elsewhere. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 326-334.
28.
Morley, D., & Brunsdon, C. ( 1999). The nationwide television studies. London: Routledge.
29.
Morley, D. ( 2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London: Routledge.
30.
Napoli, P. ( 2001). Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
31.
Prindle, G. ( 2003). No competition: How radio consolidation has diminished diversity and sacrificed localism. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 14, 279-325.
32.
Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC, 373 F.3d 372 (3d Cir., 2004).
33.
Rheingold, H. ( 1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
34.
Schudson, M. ( 1998). The good citizen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Smulyan, S. ( 1994). Selling radio: The commercialization of American broadcasting, 1920-1934. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
36.
Stavitsky, A.G. ( 1994). The changing conception of localism in U.S. public radio . Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38(1), 19-33.
37.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission. (1941 , May). Report on chain broadcasting (Order No. 37, Docket No. 5060). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
38.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission. (2000 ). Creation of low power radio service. Retrieved June 18, 2009, from www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-19A1.pdf
39.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission. (2007 ). Low power FM broadcast radio stations. Retrieved September 20, 2007, from http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/lpfm/index.html
U.S. Federal Communications Commission. (2008 b). Broadcast localism. Retrieved June 18, 2009 , from http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-218A1.pdf
42.
U.S. House 70th Congress. (1928). 4489.
43.
Walker, J. ( 2001). Rebels on the air: An alternative history of radio in America. New York: New York University Press.
